The principle objective of this study was to characterize the absorption, metabolism, and disposition of orally administered [14C]-triamcinolone acetonide. Six healthy male subjects each received a single 100 microCi (approximately 800 micrograms) oral dose of [14C]-triamcinolone acetonide. Plasma, urine, and fecal samples were collected at selected times and analyzed for triamcinolone acetonide and [14C]-derived radioactivity. Plasma protein binding of triamcinolone acetonide was also determined. Metabolite profiling and identification were carried out in plasma and excreta. Principle metabolites were assessed for activity with in vitro anti-inflammatory models. [14C]-triamcinolone acetonide was found to be systemically absorbed following oral administration. The presystemic metabolism and clearance of triamcinolone acetonide were extensive, with only a small fraction of the total plasma radioactivity being made up of triamcinolone acetonide. Little to no parent compound was detected in the plasma 24 hours after administration. Most of the urinary and fecally [14C]-derived radioactivity was also excreted within 24 and 72 hours postdose, respectively. Mean plasma protein binding of triamcinolone acetonide was constant, predictable, and a relatively low 68% over a 24-fold range of plasma concentrations. Three principle metabolites of triamcinolone acetonide were profiled in plasma, urine, and feces. These metabolites were identified as 6 beta-hydroxy triamcinolone, 21-carboxylic acid triamcinolone acetonide, and 6 beta-hydroxy-21-oic triamcinolone acetonide. All three metabolites failed to show any concentration-dependent effects in anti-inflammatory models evaluating IL-5-sustained eosinophil viability and IgE-induced basophil histamine release.

The potential for enhanced systemic absorption of intranasal triamcinolone acetonide was explored in patients with inflamed nasal mucosa. Twelve allergic rhinitis patients with documented nasal inflammation, and 12 healthy volunteers, each received a single, therapeutic, 400-micrograms dose of triamcinolone acetonide in each nostril. Blood was obtained at fixed time points after the dose, and plasma concentrations of triamcinolone acetonide were determined by radioimmunoassay. There were no statistically significant differences in any of the derived pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum plasma triamcinolone acetonide concentrations [Cmax], time to maximum plasma triamcinolone concentrations [Tmax], elimination half-life [t1/2], and area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC0-12] from 0 to 12 hours) between treatment groups. A once-a-day, chronic regimen (6 weeks) of triamcinolone acetonide was also administered to five patients with allergic rhinitis. Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar to the parameters derived from healthy volunteers after acute administration. There was no evidence of drug accumulation. The results of this study indicate that acute and chronic intranasal administration. The results of this study indicate that acute and chronic intranasal administration of therapeutic doses of triamcinolone acetonide to patients with inflamed nasal mucosa does not result in enhanced systemic drug absorption or accumulation.

Patients with renal impairment are at higher risk of thrombosis and bleeding than those with normal renal function. The optimal rivaroxaban dose for thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients with renal impairment is unknown. MARINER and MAGELLAN were multicenter, randomized clinical trials of rivaroxaban in acutely ill medical patients. Efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with renal impairment in MARINER (7.5 mg once daily) were compared with those in patients with normal renal function in MARINER (10 mg once daily) and in a subpopulation of MAGELLAN that excluded patients at high risk for bleeding at baseline (10 mg once daily). Compared with enoxaparin/placebo in the MAGELLAN subpopulation, the relative risk (RR) of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) and VTE-related death with rivaroxaban 10 mg in patients with renal impairment (RR = 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27–1.44) was similar to that in those with normal renal function (RR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.44–1.40), while in MARINER, the 7.5 mg dose did not reduce the risk in patients with renal impairment (hazard ratio = 1.00; 95% CI 0.52–1.92). Major bleeding with rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily was higher in patients with renal impairment than in those with normal renal function in MAGELLAN (1.54% vs. 0.98%) and in the MAGELLAN subpopulation (0.94% vs. 0.61%). At a dose of 10 mg once daily, rivaroxaban is effective for thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients with impaired or normal renal function. The safety of this regimen is enhanced without loss of efficacy by excluding patients at high risk for bleeding, but not by using a reduced-dose strategy. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00571649 for the MAGELLAN trial, NCT02111564 for the MARINER trial.

Triamcinolone acetonide is a glucocorticoid administered by oral inhalation in the management of asthma. With oral inhalation of glucocorticoids, systemic absorption can come from oropharyngeal, gastrointestinal, or airway deposition of the drug. The objectives of this study were to determine the absolute bioavailability of triamcinolone acetonide following inhalation administration and to delineate the airway contribution of triamcinolone acetonide absorption relative to the absolute bioavailability. All subjects received a 5-minute 400 mcg intravenous infusion of triamcinolone acetonide and a single 800 mcg dose of inhaled triamcinolone acetonide with and without oral charcoal administration in a randomized three-way crossover fashion. The oral charcoal allowed for isolating the pulmonary component of absorption by adsorbing the oropharyngeal and gastrointestinal deposited drug. The mean (+/- SD) absolute bioavailability value for inhaled triamcinolone acetonide was 25% (8.75%). Delineation of the airway contribution of triamcinolone acetonide absorption showed that 10.4% of an inhaled dose is absorbed as triamcinolone acetonide from the lungs. Mean (+/- SD) total body clearance was rapid at 0.57 (0.12) L/hr/kg. The mean (+/- SD) apparent volume of distribution following the intravenous dose was a low 1.96 (0.31) L/kg. No significant differences were noted in the apparent terminal elimination half-life of triamcinolone acetonide (approximately 2.4 hr) between treatments.

The impending phaseout of chlorofluorocarbons as propellants in pressurized metered-dose inhalers used in the treatment of asthma has resulted in the development of alternative devices to deliver drug to the pulmonary airways. These alternative devices include metered-dose inhalers using environmentally friendly hydroflurocarbon propellants and breath-actuated dry-powder inhalers. The purpose of this study was to compare the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of a newly developed hydroflurocarbon formulation of triamcinolone acetonide (Azmacort HFA 225 mcg Inhalation Aerosol) to that of the dry-powder formulation of budesonide (Pulmicort Turbuhaler 200 mcg). This three-way crossover study used 18 normal healthy subjects each receiving a 675 mcg dose of triamcinolone acetonide, 600 mcg dose of budesonide, or placebo twice a day for 5 days. Serial plasma samples were collected after the first and last dose of test medication for pharmacokinetic analysis. Pharmacodynamics were assessed by changes in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function as measured by 8 a.m. serum cortisol, 24-hour overnight serum cortisol AUC(0-24), and 24-hour urinary-free cortisol after the last evening dose of test drug. Tolerability was assessed through physical examinations, vital signs, 12-lead ECG, routine clinical labs, and adverse events recording. Both compounds were systemically absorbed. However, no significant drug accumulation was noted with chronic dosing. Chronic dosing did result in a statistically significant 20% reduction in basal 24-hour serum cortisol AUC(0-24) for both compounds. There were no clinically significant abnormalities in physical examination, vital signs, 12-lead ECG, or routine clinical labs noted during the study. Overall, the study drugs were well tolerated, with adverse events characterized as mild to moderate in severity.

Abstract. This summary workshop report highlights presentations and over-arching themes from an October 2011 workshop. Discussions focused on best practices in the application of biopharmaceutics in oral drug product development and evolving bioequivalence approaches. Best practices leverage biopharmaceutic data and other drug, formulation, and patient/disease data to identify drug development challenges in yielding a successfully performing product. Quality by design and product developability paradigms were discussed. Development tools include early development strategies to identify critical absorption factors and oral absorption modeling. An ongoing theme was the desire to comprehensively and systematically assess risk of product failure via the quality target product profile and root cause and risk analysis. However, a parallel need is reduced timelines and fewer resources. Several presentations discussed applying Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) and in vitro-in vivo correlations in development and in post-development and discussed both resource savings and best scientific practices. The workshop also focused on evolving bioequivalence approaches, with emphasis on highly variable products (HVDP), as well as specialized modified-release products. In USA, two bioequivalence approaches for HVDP are the reference-scaled average bioequivalence approach and the two-stage group-sequential design. An adaptive sequential design approach is also acceptable in Canada. In European Union, two approaches for HVDP are a two-stage design and an approach to widen C max acceptance limits. For some specialized modified-release products, FDA now requests partial area under the curve. Rationale and limitations of such metrics were discussed (e.g., zolpidem and methylphenidate). A common theme was the benefit of the scientific and regulatory community developing, validating, and harmonizing newer bioequivalence methodologies (e.g., BCS-based waivers and HVDP trial designs).

No abstract

No abstract