There are few published examples of experiences involving patients and the public in HTA. These examples show that patients' or the public's perspectives could add important dimensions to the evaluation of health technologies. However, there is a need to develop more systematic approaches to considering patients' and the public's perspectives in HTA.

Background The recent establishment of health technology assessment (HTA) units in University hospitals in the Province of Quebec (Canada) provides a unique opportunity to foster increased participation of patients in decisions regarding health technologies and interventions at the local level. However, little is known about factors that influence whether the patient's perspective is taken into consideration when such decisions are made.

Background: Recognizing the importance of increased patient participation in healthcare decisions leads decision makers to consider effective ways to incorporate patient perspectives in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) processes. The implementation of local health HTA units in university hospitals in Quebec provides a unique opportunity to foster an increased participation of patients in decisions regarding health technologies and clinical interventions. This project explores strategies that could be effective in involving patients in HTA activities at the local level. To do so, three objectives are pursued: 1) To synthesise international knowledge and experiences on patient and public involvement in HTA activities; 2) To explore the perceptions of stakeholders (administrators, clinical managers, healthcare professionals, HTA producers, and patients) regarding strategies for involving patients in various HTA activities; and 3) To produce a consensual strategic framework that could guide interventions for involving patients in HTA activities at the local level.

BackgroundThe literature recognizes a need for greater patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA), but few studies have been reported, especially at the local level. Following the decentralisation of HTA in Quebec, Canada, the last few years have seen the creation of HTA units in many Quebec university hospital centres. These units represent a unique opportunity for increased patient involvement in HTA at the local level. Our project will engage patients in an assessment being carried out by a local HTA team to assess alternatives to isolation and restraint for hospitalized or institutionalized adults. Our objectives are to: 1) validate a reference framework for exploring the relevance and applicability of various models of patient involvement in HTA, 2) implement strategies that involve patients (including close relatives and representatives) at different stages of the HTA process, 3) evaluate intervention processes, and 4) explore the impact of these interventions on a) the applicability and acceptability of recommendations arising from the assessment, b) patient satisfaction, and c) the sustainability of this approach in HTA.MethodsFor Objective 1, we will conduct individual interviews with various stakeholders affected by the use of alternatives to isolation and restraint for hospitalized or institutionalized adults. For Objective 2, we will implement three specific strategies for patient involvement in HTA: a) direct participation in the HTA process, b) consultation of patients or their close relatives through data collection, and c) patient involvement in the dissemination of HTA results. For Objectives 3 and 4, we will evaluate the intervention processes and the impact of patient involvement strategies on the recommendations arising from the HTA and the understanding of the ethical and social implications of the HTA.DiscussionThis project is likely to influence future HTA practices because it directly targets knowledge users' need for strategies that increase patient involvement in HTA. By documenting the processes and outcomes of these involvement strategies, the project will contribute to the knowledge base related to patient involvement in HTA.

In this pilot randomized, double-blind, cross-over study, the effectiveness and safety of hydromorphone administration by continuous subcutaneous (s.c.) infusion (mode A) and by continuous basal rate s.c. infusion + PCA (mode B) were compared in 8 cancer patients. Patients experimented with each infusion mode during 48 h. Statistical analysis was performed on data collected in 7 patients during 36 h from 22:00 h on day 1 to 10:00 h on day 3 and from 22:00 h on day 3 to 10:00 h on day 5. Mean hydromorphone dose +/- S.D. was 56.6 +/- 30.1 and 40.4 +/- 24.5 mg/36 h for modes A and B, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference observed in mean pain intensity, but the absence of significant difference may be related to the small sample size and high individual variability. Both methods provided adequate overall pain control in most patients. However, a large interindividual variation was detected. Indeed, some patients reported in the subjective questionnaire that they felt marked discomfort during hydromorphone administration with mode B. Only 2 patients chose mode B at the end of the study, but it was interesting to note that those 2 patients were the youngest of the group. This study demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of both modes of hydromorphone administration. The data suggest that it may be possible to identify particular cancer patients which can really benefit from an association of a basal rate infusion and PCA for opiate administration.