Golubev and Zaikin Reply: In their Comment [1], Aleiner, Altshuler, and Gershenson (AAG) stated that we [2] "found that 'zero-point fluctuations of electrons' contribute to the dephasing rate 1͞t w ." We made no such claims. Obviously, the eigenmodes of any quantum system preserve their coherence. On the other hand, single-particle properties of an interacting system-which are not directly expressed in terms of eigenmodes-can display a finite decoherence length L w even in the lowtemperature limit. An example is provided by a particle coupled to a harmonic oscillator bath [4], which we discuss explicitly below. This is also the case for the weak localization correction to the conductivity ds in the presence of interaction, where we found [2] L w to remain finite at T ! 0. AAG furthermore concluded that our procedure is "simply wrong" because "some contributions were lost." This is not the case, as demonstrated by the fact that our approach [2]-if analyzed perturbativelyreproduces the AAG result for ds (Ref.[2] of [1]) before disorder averaging. The main discrepancy between [1] and [2] is due to the golden rule approximation employed by AAG and not due to averaging over disorder.
We investigate the breakdown of BCS superconductivity in {\em ultra}\/small
metallic grains as a function of particle size (characterized by the mean
spacing $d$ between discrete electronic eigenstates), and the parity ($P$ =
even/odd) of the number of electrons on the island. Assuming equally spaced
levels, we solve the parity-dependent BCS gap equation for the order parameter
$\Delta_P (d,T)$. Both the $T=0$ critical level spacing $d_{c,P} $ and the
critical temperature $T_{c,P} (d)$ at which $\Delta_P = 0$ are parity
dependent, and both are so much smaller in the odd than the even case that
these differences should be measurable in current experiments.Comment: 4 pages RevTeX, 1 encapsulated postscript figure, submitted to
Physical Review Letter
We point out that the low temperature saturation of the electron phase
decoherence time in a disordered conductor can be explained within the existing
theory of weak localization provided the effect of quantum (high frequency)
fluctuations is taken into account. Making use of the fluctuation-dissipation
theorem we evaluate the quantum decoherence time, the crossover temperature
below which thermal effects become unimportant, and the weak localization
correction $\delta \sigma$ at T=0. For 1d systems the latter is found to be
$\delta \sigma \propto 1/ \sqrt{N}$, where $N$ is the number of conducting
channels.Comment: RevTeX, 3 page
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.