Good quality referral information enables appropriate triage and the best use of scarce secondary care resources. We evaluated the quality of GPs' referral letters to our district general hospital diabetes centre to identify types of information that receive the highest and the least priority with the objective of developing constructive feedback.Eighty-one letters from 51 GPs, excluding requests for reassessment, emergency inpatient care or non-diabetic concerns, were evaluated on 24 parameters of varying clinical importance and categorised as 'low'(0.0-9.9), 'mid'(10.0-19.9) or 'high' (20.0-30.0) scoring (total 30.0 points).Total scores ranged from 4.5 to 30 (mean 13.3). Mean per cent scores (95% confidence intervals), for selected parameters were: home glucose monitoring 29. Overall, letters were lacking in information regarding surveillance, recognition and management of microangiopathy, blood pressure, body weight, home glucose monitoring and biochemistry. High-scoring letters reflected good insight into the care of people with diabetes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.