The hAT superfamily comprises a large and diverse array of DNA
transposons found in all supergroups of eukaryotes. Here we characterized the
Drosophila buzzatii BuT2 element and found that it harbors a five-exon
gene encoding a 643-aa putatively functional transposase. A phylogeny built with 85
hAT transposases yielded, in addition to the two major groups already
described, Ac and Buster, a third one comprising 20
sequences that includes BuT2, Tip100, hAT-4_BM, and
RP-hAT1. This third group is here named Tip. In addition, we
studied the phylogenetic distribution and evolution of BuT2 by in silico
searches and molecular approaches. Our data revealed BuT2 was, most
often, vertically transmitted during the evolution of genus Drosophila
being lost independently in several species. Nevertheless, we propose the occurrence of
three horizontal transfer events to explain its distribution and conservation among
species. Another aspect of BuT2 evolution and life cycle is the presence
of short related sequences, which contain similar 5′ and 3′ regions, including
the terminal inverted repeats. These sequences that can be considered as miniature
inverted repeat transposable elements probably originated by internal deletion of complete
copies and show evidences of recent mobilization.
Heliconius are unpalatable butterflies that exhibit remarkable intra‐ and interspecific variation in wing color pattern, specifically warning coloration. Species that have converged on the same pattern are often clustered in Müllerian mimicry rings. Overall, wing color patterns are nearly identical among co‐mimics. However, fine‐scale differences exist, indicating that factors in addition to natural selection may underlie wing phenotype. Here, we investigate differences in shape and size of the forewing and the red band in the Heliconius postman mimicry ring (H. erato phyllis and the co‐mimics H. besckei, H. melpomene burchelli, and H. melpomene nanna) using a landmark‐based approach. If phenotypic evolution is driven entirely by predation pressure, we expect nonsignificant differences among co‐mimics in terms of wing shape. Also, a reinforcement of wing pattern (i.e., greater similarity) could occur when co‐mimics are in sympatry. We also examined variation in the red forewing band because this trait is critical for both mimicry and sexual communication. Morphometric results revealed significant but small differences among species, particularly in the shape of the forewing of co‐mimics. Although we did not observe greater similarity when co‐mimics were in sympatry, nearly identical patterns provided evidence of convergence for mimicry. In contrast, mimetic pairs could be distinguished based on the shape (but not the size) of the red band, suggesting an “advergence” process. In addition, sexual dimorphism in the red band shape (but not size) was found for all lineages. Thus, we infer that natural selection due to predation by birds might not be the only mechanism responsible for variation in color patterns, and sexual selection could be an important driver of wing phenotypic evolution in this mimicry ring.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.