ResumoA avaliação do consumo alimentar na prática clínica é realizada com a finalidade de fornecer subsídios para o desenvolvimento e a implantação de planos nutricionais. Fatores como condições do estado geral do indivíduo/paciente, evolução da condição clínica e os motivos pelos quais o indivíduo necessita de orientação nutricional direcionam a escolha do método de avaliação do consumo alimentar. O método escolhido deve fornecer informações que permitam ao profissional orientar uma alimentação que vise promover a saúde, prevenir outras intercorrên-cias e adequar o estado nutricional do paciente. Apesar de a literatura nacional disponibilizar informações abrangentes sobre métodos e técnicas para estimativa do consumo alimentar, o ambiente de atuação profissional ainda está permeado de dúvidas a respeito dos métodos mais adequados para essa avaliação na prática diária. O presente artigo se propôs a apresentar uma análise crítica, no contexto da aplicabilidade clínica, dos métodos disponíveis de inquéritos alimentares e suas características. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab. 2009;53(5):617-24. Descritores Consumo de alimentos; nutrientes; dieta AbstRActThe assessment of food consumption in clinical practice is often carried out to develop and implement nutritional advice. Factors as the patient health conditions, the evolution of his/her clinical condition as well as the reasons that motivated the search for advice will guide the selection of the best method of assessment of food consumption or nutrient intake to employ. The chosen method might drive the professional to offer a food plan that aims to promote health, to prevent illness, and to alter the nutritional state of the patient. Despite the easily available national literature on methods and techniques to estimate food consumption, it is not uncommon that professionals still have doubts about what methods are the most appropriated in daily practice. This study aimed to present a critical analysis, taking into account the clinical applicability, of the food assessment methods and its characteristics. IntRoDução A demanda por atendimento nutricional, tanto na rede básica de Saúde quanto em clínicas e consultórios, tem crescido significativamente, em decorrência do aumento da prevalência de doenças crônicas e do reconhecimento de que a adoção de uma dieta saudável representa um dos principais determinantes dessas doenças.A intervenção dietoterápica é comprovadamente reconhecida como tratamento isolado ou coadjuvante de doenças como obesidade, cardiovasculares, hipertensão, diabetes melito, osteoporose e câncer. Porém, para que o tratamento nutricional seja eficaz, deve-se partir de um diagnóstico adequado, o que demanda conhecimentos aprofundados sobre os fatores que fundamentam o consumo alimentar individual.Documento recente elaborado pelo Conselho Federal de Nutricionistas, que estabelece os procedimentos nutricionais para atuação profissional, enfatiza a necessi-
The revised version of the Brazilian Healthy Eating Index is an indicator of dietary quality developed according to current nutritional recommendations. Dietary data were obtained from a population-based survey, the 2003 Inquérito de Saúde e Alimentação (ISA -Health and Diet Survey)-Capital. The Revised Index consists of 12 components: nine food groups included in the 2006 Brazilian Dietary Guidelines, in which daily portions are expressed in terms of energy density; two nutrients (sodium and saturated fats), and SoFAAS (calories from solid fat, alcohol and added sugar). The Revised Brazilian Healthy Eating Index allows for the measurement of dietary risk factors for chronic diseases, evaluating and monitoring the diet at both individual and population levels.
This systematic review collates research on the topic of dietary patterns and breast cancer risks. The literature search targeted epidemiological studies published up to December 2012 and was conducted using the Medline (U.S. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda MD, USA) and Lilacs (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil) databases. The following search terms were used: breast cancer, breast neoplasm, breast carcinoma, diet, food, eating habits, dietary patterns, factor analysis, and principal component analysis. Only studies that used factor analysis techniques and/or principal component analysis were eligible, and a total of 26 studies were included. The findings of these studies suggest the Mediterranean dietary pattern and diets composed largely of vegetables, fruit, fish, and soy are associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer. There was no evidence of an association between traditional dietary patterns and risk of breast cancer, and only one study showed a significant increase in risk associated with the Western dietary pattern. Diets that include alcoholic beverages may be associated with increased risk.
ResumoO Questionário de Freqüência Alimentar (QFA) tornou-se o método dominante nos estudos epidemiológicos para avaliação do consumo dietético, em especial para avaliar a relação da dieta com a ocorrência de doenças crônicas não transmissíveis. O QFA é um instrumento que tem como objetivo a avaliação da dieta habitual de grupos populacionais e apresenta como vantagens a rapidez na aplicação e a eficiência na prá-tica epidemiológica para identificar o consumo habitual de alimentos, além do baixo custo. Comparado a outros instrumentos, substitui a medição da ingestão alimentar de um ou vários dias pela informação global da ingestão de um período amplo de tempo. Constitui ferramenta útil nos estudos sempre que seu desenvolvimento tenha sido precedido por procedimentos metodológicos cuidadosamente planejados que garantirão confiabilidade e precisão dos dados. Para tanto, são necessários estudos de validação que permitam estimar os erros de medição próprios do método. Sem o reconhecimento destes erros, a relação dieta-doença poderá estar prejudicada. Este artigo pretende abordar de forma sistemática considerações metodológicas para a realização de estudos de validação de QFA.Palavras-chave: Palavras-chave: Palavras-chave: Palavras-chave: Palavras-chave: Questionários de freqüên-cia alimentar. Estudo de validação. Dieta habitual.
A comprehensive estimation of polyphenol intake is needed to gain a better understanding of the association between polyphenol-rich food intake and the potential effects of this intake on chronic diseases. The aim of this study was to estimate the intake of polyphenols and the major dietary contributors in the population of Sao Paulo. Data were obtained from the Health Survey-São Paulo (ISA-Capital 2008) and were reported for 1103 adults and elderly adults. Food intake was estimated by one 24-h dietary recall (24HR). Polyphenol intake was calculated by matching food consumption data from the 24HR with the polyphenol content in foods listed in the Phenol-Explorer database. The mean total intake of polyphenols was 377·5 (SE 15·3) mg/d. The main polyphenol classes were phenolic acids (284·8 (SE 15·9) mg/d) and flavonoids (54·6 (SE 3·5) mg/d). Intakes were higher in the elderly adults than in other adults (P < 0·001) and higher in individuals with lower educational level (P = 0·01) and current smokers (P = 0·02). The main dietary contributors for total polyphenols were coffee (70·5 %), citrus fruits (4·6 %) and tropical fruits (3·4 %). Coffee was the major source of polyphenols, providing 266·2 (SE 16·5) mg/d, and contributed 92·3 % of the phenolic acids and 93·1 % of the alkylmethoxyphenols. These findings will be useful for assessing the potential role on health of polyphenols and specific polyphenol-rich foods, such as coffee, and enable a comparison with people from other countries.
Background: Against a backdrop of population aging and improving survival rates for chronic noncommunicable diseases (CNCD), researchers are placing growing emphasis on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of this study was to identify the QoL assessment instruments used in population-based studies with adults conducted around the world. Methods: A systematic review of original research published in all languages between 2008 and 2018 was conducted. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were excluded. Results: Sixty-three articles (38.1% conducted in the Americas) fitted the eligibility criteria. Based on the AHRQ checklist for cross-sectional studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort studies, methodological quality was shown to be fair in the majority of studies (55.6%) and good in 44.4%. The country with the highest number of publications was Brazil (20.6%). Twelve types of generic instruments and 11 specific instruments were identified. The generic instrument SF-36 was the most frequently used measure (33.3% of studies). In-home interviewing was exclusively used by 47.6% of the studies, while 39 studies (61.9%) reported the use of self-administered questionnaires. Over two-thirds of the studies (34.9%) used questionnaires to investigate the association between chronic diseases and/or associated factors. Conclusions: It was concluded that the wide range of instruments and modes of questionnaire administration used by the studies may hinder comparisons between population groups with the same characteristics or needs. There is a lack of research on QoL and the factors affecting productive capacity. Studies of QoL in older persons should focus not only on the effects of disease and treatment, but also on the determinants of active aging and actions designed to promote it. Further research is recommended to determine which QoL instruments are best suited for population-based studies.
The revised version of the Brazilian Healthy Eating Index is an indicator of dietary quality developed according to current nutritional recommendations. Dietary data were obtained from a population-based survey, the 2003 Inquérito de Saúde e Alimentação (ISA -Health and Diet Survey)-Capital. The Revised Index consists of 12 components: nine food groups included in the 2006 Brazilian Dietary Guidelines, in which daily portions are expressed in terms of energy density; two nutrients (sodium and saturated fats), and SoFAAS (calories from solid fat, alcohol and added sugar). The Revised Brazilian Healthy Eating Index allows for the measurement of dietary risk factors for chronic diseases, evaluating and monitoring the diet at both individual and population levels.
Introduction: Statistical methods such as Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Factor Analysis (FA) are increasingly popular in Nutritional Epidemiology studies. However, misunderstandings regarding the choice and application of these methods have been observed. Objectives: This study aims to compare and present the main differences and similarities between FA and PCA, focusing on their applicability to nutritional studies. Methods: PCA and FA were applied on a matrix of 34 variables expressing the mean food intake of 1,102 individuals from a population-based study. Results: Two factors were extracted and, together, they explained 57.66% of the common variance of food group variables, while five components were extracted, explaining 26.25% of the total variance of food group variables. Among the main differences of these two methods are: normality assumption, matrices of variance-covariance/correlation and its explained variance, factorial scores, and associated error. The similarities are: both analyses are used for data reduction, the sample size usually needs to be big, correlated data, and they are based on matrices of variance-covariance. Conclusion: PCA and FA should not be treated as equal statistical methods, given that the theoretical rationale and assumptions for using these methods as well as the interpretation of results are different.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.