Increased excitability of motor neurons in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) may be a relevant factor leading to motor neuron damage. This randomized, double-blind, three-way crossover, placebo-controlled study evaluated peripheral motor nerve excitability testing as a biomarker of hyperexcitability and assessed the effects of riluzole and retigabine in 18 patients with ALS. We performed excitability testing at baseline, and twice after participants had received a single dose of either 100 mg riluzole, 300 mg retigabine, or placebo. Between- and within-day repeatability was at least acceptable for 14 out of 18 recorded excitability variables. No effects of riluzole on excitability testing were observed, but retigabine significantly decreased strength-duration time-constant (9.2%) and refractoriness at 2 ms (10.2) compared to placebo. Excitability testing was shown to be a reliable biomarker in patients with ALS, and the acute reversal of previously abnormal variables by retigabine justifies long-term studies evaluating the impact on disease progression and survival.
Background: To quantify pharmacological effects on tremor in patients with essential tremor (ET) or Parkinson's Disease (PD), laboratory-grade accelerometers have previously been used. Over the last years, consumer products such as smartphones and smartwatches have been increasingly applied to measure tremor in an easy way. However, it is unknown how the technical performance of these consumer product accelerometers (CPAs) compares to laboratory-grade accelerometers (LGA). This study was performed to compare the technical performance of CPAs with LGA to measure tremor in patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET). Methods: In ten patients with PD and ten with ET, tremor peak frequency and corresponding amplitude were measured with 7 different CPAs (Apple iPhone 7, Apple iPod Touch 5, Apple watch 2, Huawei Nexus 6P, Huawei watch, mbientlabMetaWear (MW) watch, mbientlab MW clip) and compared to a LGA (Biometrics ACL300) in resting and extended arm position. Results: Both in PD and ET patients, the peak frequency of CPAs did not significantly differ from the LGA in terms of limits of agreement. For the amplitude at peak frequency, only the iPhone and MW watch performed comparable to the LGA in ET patients, while in PD patients all methods performed comparable except for the iPod Touch and Huawei Nexus. Amplitude was higher when measured with distally-located CPAs (Clip, iPhone, iPod) compared with proximally-located CPAs (all watches). The variability between subjects was higher than within subjects for frequency (25.1% vs. 13.4%) and amplitude measurement (331% vs. 53.6%). Resting arm position resulted in lower intra-individual variability for frequency and amplitude (13.4 and 53.5%) compared to extended arm position (17.8 and 58.1%).
Rationale:
Assessment of the effects of medicines on the risks of car driving must be derived from laboratory tests, simulated driving or real on-road driving tests. Relevance of tests is determined by their sensitivity and predictive ability for the probability of accidents or damage. This cannot be determined directly, but methods should be able to at least detect the effects of a positive control in dosage known to be clearly associated with increased risk.
Objectives:
A driving simulator was evaluated in comparison with a battery of validated tests of CNS performance, the NeuroCart®. Alcohol in a concentration exactly at the legal limit (0.5 g L−1) and well above (1.0 g L−1) as well as alprazolam (1 mg) was used as positive control.
Methods:
This was a randomised, cross-over study using a double dummy blinded design in 24 healthy study subjects (12 M, 12 F) aged 20–43 years. Alcohol was infused intravenously using a validated clamping protocol to obtain concentrations of 0.5 g L−1 and on another occasion 1.0 g L−1. Alprazolam was given orally. Driving tests and lab tests were done at regular time intervals during a study day.
Results:
Alprazolam and alcohol significantly affected the main parameters of driving in the simulator and affected scores of safe driving and alprazolam increased the odds ratio of a virtual crash. Several laboratory measurements of psychomotor performance were affected by the reference substances as expected and correlated significantly with the driving performance
Conclusions:
The driving simulator can detect effects of reference substances at levels that are known to negatively affect driving.
Keyhole limpet haemocyanin (KLH) immunization is a clinical model for the evaluation of human antibody responses. The current study evaluated the anti-KLH antibody response after KLH immunization and the delayed-type hypersensitivity response following intradermal KLH administration, using objective imaging techniques. Methods: Healthy male subjects aged 24.5 ± 5.4 years were randomized to intramuscular immunization with 100 μg KLH (n = 12) or placebo (n = 3). Anti-KLH antibody (Ig) M and IgG titres were determined before and every 7 days after KLH immunization for a total of 28 days. Twenty-one days after the immunization, all subjects received 1 μg KLH intradermally. Prior to and 2 days after intradermal KLH administration, skin blood perfusion, erythema and oedema were quantified using noninvasive imaging tools. Repeated measures ANCOVAs were used to analyse data. Results: Anti-KLH IgM and IgG titres increased after KLH immunization compared to placebo (estimated difference [ED]: 37%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 19-51% and ED: 68%, 95% CI: 56-76% respectively). Upon intradermal KLH administration an increase in skin blood perfusion (ED: 10.9 arbitrary units (AU), 95% CI: 1.4-20.4 AU) and erythema (ED: 0.3 AU, 95% CI: 0.1-0.5 AU) was observed in KLH-immunized subjects compared to placebo. Conclusion: KLH immunization followed by intradermal KLH administration resulted in increased anti-KLH IgM and IgG titres and a delayed-type hypersensitivity response quantified by an increase in skin blood perfusion and erythema. Using noninvasive imaging tools the KLH model has the potential to serve as an objective tool to study the pharmacodynamics of T-cell-directed immunomodulatory drugs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.