Intranasal insulin improved story recall performance of apoe4 (-) patients with AD or MCI. Other cognitive functions were not affected, but there were some positive results in functional status and daily activity. Since IN insulin is a safe intervention, future studies should be conducted with larger doses and after proper selection of patients and insulin types.

Cognitive impairment and dementia are established complications of heart failure (HF) in adult patients and impair medication adherence and self-care. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is suggested to play an independent role in the cognitive decline in patients with HF. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effect of AF on cognitive function in these patients. Medline (PubMed), Scopus, and the CENTRAL databases were queried from their inception up to April 30, 2016. The search included primary research articles evaluating the effect of AF on cognition in HF patients. There were five eligible studies, including a total of 1670 patients with HF; of these, 449 (26.9%) had AF. Different AF types were studied, including persistent, paroxysmal, or permanent. Four cognitive tests were used to assess cognitive function (Mini-Mental State Examination, Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire, Modified Mini-Mental Examination, and Montreal cognitive assessment tool). Using the inverse variance method and a random effects model, we observed that presence of AF was significantly associated with increased risk of cognitive impairment in HF patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-2.87), although with significant heterogeneity (I = 39%). This heterogeneity can be attributed to the different populations and types of AF studied as well as to varying cognitive assessment methods. Concomitant AF may exacerbate cognitive dysfunction in HF patients. However, data are sparse and heterogeneous. Well-designed, prospective studies are needed to (a) establish a causative link and (b) identify the underlying mechanism in order to design appropriate interventions to attenuate risk of cognitive impairment in patients with HF.

BACKGROUND Most of the randomized clinical trials that led to the wide use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) originated from western countries. AIM To systematically review and quantitatively synthesize the real-world data regarding the efficacy and safety of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban compared to warfarin for stroke prevention in Asian patients with non-valvular AF. METHODS Medline, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrial.gov databases were reviewed. A random-effect model meta-analysis was used and I-square was utilized to assess the heterogeneity. The primary outcome was ischemic stroke. The secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal bleeding. RESULTS Twelve studies from East Asia or Southeast Asia and 441450 patients were included. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban were associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of ischemic stroke [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65-0.94; HR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.74-0.85, HR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.62-0.78; respectively], all-cause mortality (HR = 0.68, 95%CI: 0.56-0.83; HR = 0.66, 95%CI: 0.52-0.84; HR = 0.66, 95%CI: 0.49-0.90; respectively), and major bleeding (HR = 0.61, 95%CI: 0.54-0.69; HR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.54-0.90; HR = 0.58, 95%CI: 0.43-0.78; respectively) compared to warfarin. CONCLUSION Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban appear to be superior to warfarin in both efficacy and safety in Asians with non-valvular AF.

Observational studies have investigated the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) used in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the risk of ischaemic stroke, thromboembolism (TE) and intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) associated with the use of DOACs and VKAs.Methods: Medline and Embase were systematically searched until April 2021. Observational studies were gathered and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted. Subgroup analyses based on DOAC doses, history of chronic kidney disease, stroke, exposure to VKA, age and sex were performed. A random-effects model was used. Results:We included 92 studies and performed 107 comparisons. Apixaban was associated with lower risk of stroke (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68-0.99) compared to dabigatran. Rivaroxaban was associated with lower risk of stroke (HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83-0.98) compared to VKA. Dabigatran (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.80-0.91), rivaroxaban (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.77-0.89) and apixaban (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.65-0.86) were associated with lower risk for TE/stroke compared to VKA.

No abstract