Background: The vertebrate sodium channel β3 subunit regulates channel behavior.Results: The immunoglobulin domain of the human β3 subunit crystallizes as a trimer, and the full-length protein assembles as a trimer in vivo.Conclusion: Our results reveal an unexpected organization of the β3 subunit.Significance: A new structural insight into the sodium channel is presented.

Transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily V, member 1 (TRPV1) plays a key role in sensing environmental hazards and in enhanced pain sensation following inflammation. A considerable proportion of TRPV1-expressing cells also express transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily A, member 1 (TRPA1). There is evidence for a TRPV1-TRPA1 interaction that is predominantly calcium-dependent, and it has been suggested that the two proteins might form a heteromeric channel. Here, we constructed subunit concatemers to search for direct evidence for such an interaction. We found that a TRPV1::TRPV1 concatemer and TRPV1 formed channels with similar properties. A TRPV1::TRPA1 concatemer was responsive to TRPV1 agonists capsaicin, acidic pH and ethanol, but not to TRPA1 agonists. Isolated TRPV1 and TRPV1::TRPA1 imaged by atomic force microscopy (AFM) both had molecular volumes consistent with the formation of tetrameric channels. Antibodies decorated epitope tags on TRPV1 with a four-fold symmetry, as expected for a homotetramer. In contrast, pairs of antibodies decorated tags on TRPV1::TRPA1 predominantly at 180°, indicating the formation of a channel consisting of two TRPV1::TRPA1 concatemers arranged face to face. TRPV1::TRPA1 was sensitized by PKC activation and could be inhibited by a TRPV1 antagonist. TRPV1::TRPA1 was activated by heat and displayed a threshold and temperature coefficient similar to TRPV1. However, the channel formed by TRPV1::TRPA1 has only two binding sites for capsaicin and shows less total current and a smaller capsaicin-induced shift in voltage-dependent gating than TRPV1::TRPV1 or TRPV1. We conclude that the presence of TRPA1 exerts a functional inhibition on TRPV1.

Background: The sigma-1 receptor modulates the activity of ion channels.Results: Atomic force microscopy imaging of complexes between sigma-1 receptors and Nav1.5 Na+ channels reveals a 4-fold symmetry.Conclusion: Each of the four sets of six transmembrane regions in Nav1.5 constitutes a sigma-1 receptor binding site.Significance: The sigma-1 receptor likely interacts with the transmembrane regions of its protein partners.

Sigma1 receptors (σ1Rs) are expressed widely; they bind diverse ligands, including psychotropic drugs and steroids, regulate many ion channels, and are implicated in cancer and addiction. It is not known how σ1Rs exert such varied effects. We demonstrate that σ1Rs inhibit store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE), a major Ca2+ influx pathway, and reduce the Ca2+ content of the intracellular stores. SOCE was inhibited by expression of σ1R or an agonist of σ1R and enhanced by loss of σ1R or an antagonist. Within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), σ1R associated with STIM1, the ER Ca2+ sensor that regulates SOCE. This interaction was modulated by σ1R ligands. After depletion of Ca2+ stores, σ1R accompanied STIM1 to ER–plasma membrane (PM) junctions where STIM1 stimulated opening of the Ca2+ channel, Orai1. The association of STIM1 with σ1R slowed the recruitment of STIM1 to ER–PM junctions and reduced binding of STIM1 to PM Orai1. We conclude that σ1R attenuates STIM1 coupling to Orai1 and thereby inhibits SOCE.

The -1 receptor (Sig1R) is widely expressed in the CNS, where it has a neuroprotective role in ischemia and stroke and an involvement in schizophrenia. The Sig1R interacts functionally with a variety of ion channels, including the NMDA receptor (NMDAR). Here, we used atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging to investigate the interaction between the Sig1R and the NMDAR. The Sig1R bound directly to GluN1/GluN2A NMDAR heterotetramers. Furthermore, the mean angle between pairs of bound Sig1Rs was 72°. This result suggested that the Sig1R interacts with either GluN1 or GluN2A, but not both, and supports our recent demonstration that the NMDAR subunits adopt an adjacent (i.e., 1/1/2/2) arrangement. The Sig1R could be coisolated with GluN1 but not with GluN2A, indicating that GluN1 is its specific target within the NMDAR. Consistent with this conclusion, AFM imaging of coisolated Sig1R and GluN1 revealed GluN1 dimers decorated with Sig1Rs. In situ proximity ligation assays demonstrated that the Sig1R interacts with GluN1 (but not with GluN2A) within intact cells and also that its C terminus is extracellular. We conclude that the Sig1R binds to the GluN1/GluN2A NMDAR specifically via the GluN1 subunit. This interaction likely accounts for at least some of the modulatory effects of Sig1R ligands on the NMDAR.