SummaryThe Salmonella enterica virulence-associated protein SpvB was recently shown to contain a carboxyterminal mono (ADP-ribosyl) whereas isolated eukaryotic control proteins or bacterial proteins were not modified. In an in vitro actin polymerization assay, the isolated catalytic SpvB domain prevented the conversion of G actin into F actin. Microscopic examination of MDCK cells infected with SH9325 revealed morphological changes and loss of filamentous actin content, whereas cells infected with the spvB mutant remained virtually unaffected. We conclude that actin is a target for an SpvB-mediated modification, most probably ADP-ribosylation, and that the modification of G actin interferes with actin polymerization.

A number of well‐known bacterial toxins ADP‐ribosylate and thereby inactivate target proteins in their animal hosts. Recently, several vertebrate ecto‐enzymes (ART1–ART7) with activities similar to bacterial toxins have also been cloned. We show here that psiblast, a position‐specific‐iterative database search program, faithfully connects all known vertebrate ecto‐mono(ADP‐ribosyl)transferases (mADPRTs) with most of the known bacterial mADPRTs. Intriguingly, no matches were found in the available public genome sequences of archaeabacteria, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae or the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Significant new matches detected by psiblast from the public sequence data bases included only one open reading frame (ORF) of previously unknown function: the spvB gene contained in the virulence plasmids of Salmonella enterica. Structure predictions of SpvB indicated that it is composed of a C‐terminal ADP‐ribosyltransferase domain fused via a poly proline stretch to a N‐domain resembling the N‐domain of the secretory toxin TcaC from nematode‐infecting enterobacteria. We produced the predicted catalytic domain of SpvB as a recombinant fusion protein and demonstrate that it, indeed, acts as an ADP‐ribosyltransferase. Our findings underscore the power of the psiblast program for the discovery of new family members in genome databases. Moreover, they open a new avenue of investigation regarding salmonella pathogenesis.

The ability of salmonellae to become internalized and to survive and replicate in amoebae was evaluated by using three separate serovars of Salmonella enterica and five different isolates of axenic Acanthamoeba spp. In gentamicin protection assays, Salmonella enterica serovar Dublin was internalized more efficiently than Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis or Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in all of the amoeba isolates tested. The bacteria appeared to be most efficiently internalized by Acanthamoeba rhysodes. Variations in bacterial growth conditions affected internalization efficiency, but this effect was not altered by inactivation of hilA, a key regulator in the expression of the invasion-associated Salmonella pathogenicity island 1. Microscopy of infected A. rhysodes revealed that S. enterica resided within vacuoles. Prolonged incubation resulted in a loss of intracellular bacteria associated with morphological changes and loss of amoebae. In part, these alterations were associated with hilA and the Salmonella virulence plasmid. The data show that Acanthamoeba spp. can differentiate between different serovars of salmonellae and that internalization is associated with cytotoxic effects mediated by defined Salmonella virulence loci.

In order to infect a host, a microbe must be equipped with special properties known as virulence factors. Bacterial virulence factors are required to facilitate colonization, to survive under host defenses, and to permit multiplication inside the host. However, the possession of genes encoding virulence factors does not guarantee effective infection. There is considerable evidence that tight regulation of a given virulence factor is as important as the possession of the virulence factors themselves. Thus, an understanding of the regulation of virulence expression is fundamental to our comprehension of any infection process and can identify potential targets for disease prevention and therapy. We have summarized the lessons learned from experimental salmonellosis in terms of virulence regulation and hope to illustrate the differing requirements for gene and virulence expression.