In this paper, we explore the problem of developing an argumentative dialogue agent that can be able to discuss with human users on controversial topics. We describe two systems that use retrieval-based and generative models to make argumentative responses to the users. The experiments show promising results although they have been trained on a small dataset.
This paper addresses the problem of human action recognition. Typically, visual action recognition systems need visual training examples for all actions that one wants to recognize. However, the total number of possible actions is staggering as not only are there many types of actions but also many possible objects for each action type. Normally, visual training examples are needed for all actions of this combinatorial explosion of possibilities. To address this problem, this paper is a first attempt to propose a general framework for unseen action recognition in still images by exploiting both visual and language models. Based on objects recognized in images by means of visual features, the system suggests the most plausible actions exploiting off-the-shelf language models. All components in the framework are trained on universal datasets, hence the system is general, flexible, and able to recognize actions for which no visual training example has been provided. This paper shows that our model yields good performance on unseen action recognition. It even outperforms a state-of-the-art Bag-of-Words model in a realistic scenario where few visual training examples are available.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.