This study correlates the histopathological classification of meningiomas with clinicopathological features of biological activity. A retrospective evaluation of 1799 surgical specimens of meningiomas from 1582 patients was made. The classic histopathological type, atypical meningiomas defined by increased cellularity and at least five mitotic figures in 10 high-power fields, anaplastic (malignant) meningiomas, and hemangiopericytic or papillary meningiomas were seen in 87.6%, 7.2%, 2.4%, and 2.8% of operations, respectively. The rates of recurrence in surgically treated patients with classic, atypical, anaplastic, and hemangiopericytic or papillary meningiomas were 6.96%, 34.6%, 72.7%, and 68.2%, respectively. The extent of surgery and the tumor size and site were studied in detail in 252 tumors of all histopathological types. Recurrences were rare in classic meningiomas after complete resection, whereas atypical and anaplastic tumors recurred after complete resection much more frequently. Classic meningiomas, hemangiopericytomas, and papillary meningiomas were smaller at surgery than atypical and malignant meningiomas. Atypical and malignant tumors were operated on more often in falcine and lateral convexity regions than were classic meningiomas. To support the authors' subjective categorization by a quantitative parameter related to proliferation, 112 meningiomas comprising all histopathological subtypes were investigated for staining of argyrophilic nucleolar organizer region proteins (Ag-NOR's). The Ag-NOR counts showed significant differences between classic, atypical, and anaplastic tumors but no significant differences between primary and recurrent tumors. Hemangiopericytomas and papillary meningiomas had lower Ag-NOR values than anaplastic meningiomas. A correlation of Ag-NOR numbers with the authors' histopathological scale of malignancy supports the introduction of atypical meningiomas with intermediate biological behavior on the classification scale between classic and anaplastic meningiomas. Overlapping of Ag-NOR numbers among all groups of malignancy may restrict the prognostic value of Ag-NOR counting in the individual case.
Dermal atrophy of more than 50% of the locoregional dermis may be the predominant histopathological feature in dermatofibroma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. This may cause diagnostic difficulties. In the present study 26 cases of atrophic dermatofibroma were compared with three cases of atrophic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Clinically, both conditions mostly occurred on the (upper) trunk of females. While atrophic dermatofibroma usually presented as a reddish, umbilicated lesion (0.5-1cm), often suspected to be a basal cell carcinoma, atrophic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans showed irregularly arranged tan-brown plaques (3-6 cm). Histologically, atrophic dermatofibroma showed a regular silhouette with a smooth nodular (9/26) or scalloped lower margin with an intervening lace-like pattern of superficial fatty tissue infiltration (17/26) and variable sclerosis: atrophic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans showed a deep, irregular infiltration of fatty tissue in a lacelike/honeycomb and/ or multilayered pattern, but no sclerosis. Immunohistochemically, atrophic dermatofibroma was mostly negative with QBEnd 10 (CD34;24/26), variably positive for factor XIIIa (20/26) and metallothionein (11/26). Labelling for factor XIIIa and metallothionein was usually seen in 'early' (metabolically active) lesions, while 'late' sclerotic ones were negative. In contrast to atrophic dermatofibroma all three atrophic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans showed a consistently uniform profile: CD34 positive, factor XIIIa and metallothionein negative. Our study delineates atrophic dermatofibroma and atrophic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans as distinct entities clearly distinguishable from each other by clinicopathologic criteria.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.