We examined age-related changes in endurance performance of marathon and half-marathon finishers. A total of 405 515 running times were separated into groups based on age, sex, and distance. After exclusion of repetitive running times, 300 757 runners were analyzed by ANOVA (factors: age, sex). For each age group (six decades, 20-79 years), mean running times for all finishers, as well as top-ten performers, were assessed. As expected, age and sex had significant influence on running times. Female running times were about 10 % (marathon) and 13 % (half-marathon) above the corresponding times of their age-matched peers. The main finding is that in our sample of trained subjects significant age-related losses in endurance performance did not occur before the age of 50 years. Mean marathon and half-marathon times were virtually identical for the age groups from 20-49 years. Moreover, age-related performance decreases (p < 0.01) of the 50 - 69-year-old subjects were only in the range of 2.6 - 4.4 % per decade. These results suggest that the majority of older athletes are able to maintain a high degree of physical plasticity. The hypothesis that lifestyle factors have considerably stronger influences on functional capacity than the factor age is also supported by these findings from physically active and fit elderly.
Hand-grip strength has been identified as one limiting factor for manual lifting and carrying loads. To obtain epidemiologically relevant hand-grip strength data for pre-employment screening, we determined maximal isometric hand-grip strength in 1,654 healthy men and 533 healthy women aged 20-25 years. Moreover, to assess the potential margins for improvement in hand-grip strength of women by training, we studied 60 highly trained elite female athletes from sports known to require high hand-grip forces (judo, handball). Maximal isometric hand-grip force was recorded over 15 s using a handheld hand-grip ergometer. Biometric parameters included lean body mass (LBM) and hand dimensions. Mean maximal hand-grip strength showed the expected clear difference between men (541 N) and women (329 N). Less expected was the gender related distribution of hand-grip strength: 90% of females produced less force than 95% of males. Though female athletes were significantly stronger (444 N) than their untrained female counterparts, this value corresponded to only the 25th percentile of the male subjects. Hand-grip strength was linearly correlated with LBM. Furthermore, both relative hand-grip strength parameters (F (max)/body weight and F (max)/LBM) did not show any correlation to hand dimensions. The present findings show that the differences in hand-grip strength of men and women are larger than previously reported. An appreciable difference still remains when using lean body mass as reference. The results of female national elite athletes even indicate that the strength level attainable by extremely high training will rarely surpass the 50th percentile of untrained or not specifically trained men.
Successful finishing of marathon requires regular endurance training and appropriate lifestyle. Thus, marathon running times and training data from large samples of physically active and fit elderly are ideal for the assessment of age-related performance. In the present study we analyzed 439 278 running times from result lists of 108 marathon competitions and data from a survey via internet questionnaire about training and behavioural factors of marathon finishers. Marathon times and 6 992 data sets from the internet questionnaire were separated into groups based on age and sex and analyzed by two-way ANOVA. Our main findings are that 1) there are virtually no relevant running time differences (p<0.01) in marathon finishers from 20 to 55 years and 2) the majority of middle-aged and elderly athletes have training histories of less than seven years of running. With the exception of marathon running times we did not encounter any significant gender related differences (p>0.01). The present findings strengthen the concept that considers aging as a biological process that can be considerably speeded up or slowed down by multiple lifestyle related factors.
Owing to changes in cardiac output, blood volume distribution and the efficacy of the muscle pump, oxygen supply may differ during upright and supine cycle exercise. In the present study we measured, in parallel, circulatory (heart rate, stroke volume, blood pressure) and metabolic parameters (oxygen uptake, lactic acid concentration [la]) during incremental-exercise tests and at constant power levels ranging from mild to severe exercise. In supine position, cardiac output exceeded the upright values by 1.0-1.5 l.min-1 during rest, light ([la] < 2 mmol.l-1) and moderate ([la] = 2-4 mmol.l-1) exercise. At higher exercise intensities the cardiac output in an upright subject approached and eventually slightly exceeded the supine values. For both rest-exercise transitions and large-amplitude steps (delta W > or = 140 W) the cardiac output kinetics was significantly faster in upright cycling. The metabolic parameters (VO2 and [la]) showed no simple relationship to the circulatory data. In light to moderate exercise they were unaffected by body position. Only in severe exercise, when cardiac output differences became minimal, could significant influences be observed: with supine body posture, [la] started to rise earlier and maximal power (delta W = 23 W) and exercise duration (64 s) were significantly reduced. However, the maximal [la] value after exercise was identical in both positions. The present findings generally show advantages of upright cycling only for severe exercise. With lower workloads the less effective muscle pump in the supine position appears to be compensated for by the improved central circulatory conditions and local vasodilatation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.