Introduction The Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) is a widely used validated Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM). For clinical research, it is important to determine the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID). The objective of this study was to determine the MCID of the OMAS at several moments in the follow-up, in a cohort of patients that underwent open reduction and internal fixation of unstable ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury. Materials and methods Data for this descriptive study were extracted from a prospective randomized controlled trial, the RODEO trial. The Dutch version of the OMAS was completed at 3, 6 and 12-month follow-up and estimated at baseline. The used anchor-based methods were: mean change and ROC curve. The distribution-based methods were: 0.5SD and minimal detectable change (MDC). Results This cohort included 148 patients. The mean OMAS score in the group with minimal improvement between 3 and 6 months was 15.0 (SD 17.5, 95%CI 9.4–20.6) and between 6 and 12 months 9.5 (SD 17.1, 95% CI 3.1–15.9). The ROC curve between 3 and 6 months resulted in a MCID of 12.5 (AUC 0.72) and between 6 and 12 months, the MCID was 7.5 (AUC 0.78). Using 0.5 SD, the MCID was 10.52 (SD 21.04) at 3 months, 11.37 (SD 22.73) at 6 months and 10.47 (SD 20.94) at 12 months. The MDC was 4.72 at 3 months, 5.20 at 6 months and 4.71 at 12 months. Conclusions The calculated MCID in patients following surgery for unstable ankle fractures ranges from 10.5 to 15.0 at 3–6-month follow-up and from 7.5 to 11.4 at 6–12-month follow-up, depending on moment and method.

Objectives: To investigate the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) after routine removal of syndesmotic screws (SSs) placed to stabilize syndesmotic injuries. Data sources: A systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases for studies published online before February 2020, using the key words and synonyms of “syndesmotic screw” (“ankle fractures” or “syndesmotic injury”) and “implant removal.” Study Selection: Studies were eligible for inclusion when they described >10 adult patients undergoing elective/scheduled removal of the SS. Data extraction: The 15 included articles were assessed for quality and risk of bias using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Baseline characteristics of the studies, the study population, the intervention, the potential confounders, and the primary outcome (% of SSIs) were extracted using a customized extraction sheet. Data synthesis: The primary outcome was presented as a proportion of included patients and as a weighted mean, using inverse variance, calculated in RStudio. Furthermore, potential confounders were identified. Conclusions: The percentage of SSIs ranged from 0% to 9.2%, with a weighted mean of 4%. The largest proportion of these infections were superficial (3%, 95% confidence interval: 2–5), compared with 2% deep infections (95% confidence interval: 1–4). These rates were comparable to those of other foot/ankle procedures indicating that the individual indication for SS removal (SSR) should be carefully considered. Future studies should focus on valid indications for SSR, the influence of prophylactic antibiotics on an SSI after SSR, and complications of retaining the SS to enable a fair benefits/risks comparison of routine versus on-demand removal of the SS. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.