A multicenter study has been employed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using the new liver-specific contrast agent gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA, Primovist), as opposed to contrast-enhanced biphasic spiral computed tomography (CT), in the diagnosis of focal liver lesions, compared with a standard of reference (SOR). One hundred and sixty-nine patients with hepatic lesions eligible for surgery underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI as well as CT within 6 weeks. Pathologic evaluation of the liver specimen combined with intraoperative ultrasound established the SOR. Data sets were evaluated on-site (14 investigators) and off-site (three independent blinded readers). Gd-EOB-DTPA was well tolerated. Three hundred and two lesions were detected in 131 patients valid for analysis by SOR. The frequency of correctly detected lesions was significantly higher on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI compared with CT in the clinical evaluation [10.44%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.88, 16.0]. In the blinded reading there was a trend towards Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI, not reaching statistical significance (2.14%; 95% CI: -4.32, 8.6). However, the highest rate of correctly detected lesions with a diameter below 1 cm was achieved by Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Differential diagnosis was superior for Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI (82.1%) versus CT (71.0%). A change in surgical therapy was documented in 19 of 131 patients (14.5%) post Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI was superior in the diagnosis and therapeutic management of focal liver lesions compared with CT.
Preoperative distinction between focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) that should be managed conservatively and hepatocellular adenoma (HA) that should be resected remains difficult. The result is controversial management of these patients. The aims of this study were to report the value of modern imaging procedures for noninvasive diagnosis of these lesions, to assess the value of intraoperative frozen section studies, and to propose a management strategy in those patients. Forty-one consecutive women with FNH (35 cases) or HA (6 cases) treated at our institution between 1985 and 1992 were studied. New imaging techniques, including enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and color Doppler ultrasonography (US), were prospectively appraised in addition to usual techniques. Histological examination of surgical specimens was obtained in all cases. A sixfold increase in the number of patients with FNH was observed during this study, whereas the number of patients with HA did not change. FNHs were incidental US findings in 74% of the cases. The best imaging procedure in the diagnosis of FNH was enhanced MRI with a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 98%. Color Doppler US was a useful adjunct. Intraoperative frozen section studies were performed in 16 patients with 19 tumors with a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 100%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
for only 6-13% of all internal hernias that cause small bowel obstruction, of which paraduodenal remains the most common. 2 Anatomically, four potential recesses around the caecum may arise owing to congenital midgut rotation during the second trimester in utero. They are defined in relation to the ileocaecal region, namely superior recess, inferior recess, retrocaecal recess and anteriorly with the paracolic sulci. 3 Its management involves prompt surgery to free up the entrapped small intestine around the paracaecal recess. The case provides interesting images and reiterates the importance of a thorough history, clinical examination and computed tomography imaging of the abdomen in the elderly presenting with right iliac fossa pain, serving as a teaching point with an interesting surgical pathology (Fig. 1).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.