This study was undertaken to assess the prognostic effectiveness of Fuhrman nuclear grading and the individual components of this grading system, in a series of chromophobe renal cell carcinomas. Eighty-seven cases of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma were investigated. There were 47 males and 40 females, 28 to 78 years of age. The carcinomas ranged from 25 to 180 mm in size and on TNM staging there were 38 stage I, 25 stage II, 22 stage III, and 2 stage IV tumors. Whole tumor Fuhrman grading was grade 1, 6 cases; grade 2, 72 cases; grade 3, 8 cases; and grade 4, 1 case, whereas focal (single high power field) grading was grade 1, 1 case; grade 2, 62 cases; grade 3, 21 cases; and grade 4, 3 cases. On assignment of nucleolar grading using Fuhrman criteria there were 37 grade 1, 44 grade 2, and 4 grade 3 tumors on whole tumor assessment and 3 grade 1, 63 grade 2, and 21 grade 3 tumors on assessment of the high power field showing the greatest degree of nuclear pleomorphism. Measurements of nuclear size showed nuclear area to range from 26.14 to 100.74 microm2, nuclear perimeter from 19.73 to 39.28 microm, and nuclear major axis from 6.49 to 13.21 microm, whereas the ranges of measures of nuclear shape were; shape factor 0.798 to 0.890, compactness 14.260 to 15.843, and feret diameter 5.694 to 11.242. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 150 months and 8 patients died of tumor-related causes 5 to 53 months from diagnosis. On log rank testing against survival, only patient age (P=0.016) and tumor maximum diameter (P=0.0055) were significant, whereas patient sex and TNM stage were not significant. Whole tumor and focal Fuhrman grading, as well as all measures of nucleolar prominence, nuclear size, and nuclear shape showed no significant association with outcome. It is concluded that neither Fuhrman grading, nor any of the components of the Fuhrman grading system, is useful as prognostic indicators for this tumor type.

This study was undertaken to determine the validity of Fuhrman grading in a series of papillary renal cell carcinomas (PRCCs), to examine the interrelationship and prognostic significance of the individual components of the grading system, and further to determine whether any observed predictive value was independent of other prognostic indicators. Ninety cases of PRCC were studied. Fifty-nine tumors were of type 1 and 31 were of type 2. There were 33 TNM stage 1, 26 stage 2, 18 stage 3, and 12 stage 4 tumors, whereas division of cases according to pT category showed 14 pT1a, 20 pT1b, 25 pT2, 15 pT3a, 4 pT3b, and 11 pT4 tumors. Ten tumors were grade 1, 58 grade 2, and 22 grade 3 when predominant Fuhrman grade was assigned, whereas grading according to the high-power field containing the highest grade (focal grade) showed 40 grade 2, 49 grade 3, and 1 grade 4 tumors. Measurements of nuclear size (area, major axis, perimeter) and shape (shape factor, compactness) were undertaken using image analysis. Nuclear area ranged from 27.63 to 116.39 microM, major axis length 6.70 to 14.06 microM, and nuclear perimeter 20.05 to 41.77 microM. Shape factor ranged from 0.805 to 0.878 and compactness from 14.33 to 15.66. Predominant nucleolar grade using the criteria of the Fuhrman classification was nucleolar grade 1 for 13 tumors, nucleolar grade 2 for 56 tumors, and nucleolar grade 3 for 21 tumors. Focal nucleolar grade based on the high-power field showing the greatest degree of nuclear pleomorphism, was grade 2 for 38 tumors and grade 3 for 52 tumors. pT category, TNM stage, focal Fuhrman grade, and PRCC type were significantly associated with survival. Of the various measures of the components of the Fuhrman classification, only focal nucleolar grade was associated with survival, on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, focal nucleolar grade and tumor diameter were independently associated with survival, whereas TNM stage retained significance independent of other parameters. It is concluded that assessment of nucleolar prominence rather than Fuhrman grade is applicable for stratification of tumors within TNM stage or pT category for PRCC and that this should be based upon the high-power field showing the greatest degree of nuclear pleomorphism.

Fuhrman grading of renal cell carcinoma focuses on features of nuclear size, nuclear shape, and nucleolar prominence. Despite the reported widespread usage of Fuhrman grading in clinical studies, there is debate as to the prognostic significance and reproducibility of its criteria. It has been noted that many pathologists rely on assessment of nucleolar prominence alone when grading renal cell carcinoma; however, the validity of this remains unconfirmed. This study was undertaken to determine the relationship of the 3 morphologic components of the Fuhrman grading system with one another and to determine which, if any of these, can be correlated with outcome for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. One hundred twenty-one organ-confined clear cell renal cell carcinomas were examined in this study. Parameters of nuclear size (area, major axis, perimeter) and nuclear shape (shape factor, nuclear compactness) were assessed by image analysis, whereas nucleolar prominence was assigned (grades 1 to 3) using the criteria of Fuhrman. On the basis of the predominant grade present, there were 17 nucleolar grade 1, 90 nucleolar grade 2, and 14 nucleolar grade 3 tumors. When the high-power field in each tumor with the worst nucleolar grade was assessed, there was 1 nucleolar grade 1, 68 nucleolar grade 2, and 52 nucleolar grade 3 tumors. Predominant and worst nucleolar grade correlated with all measures of nuclear size, but not nuclear shape. Worst nucleolar grade and all parameters of nuclear size were significantly associated with outcome. On multivariate analysis, worst nucleolar grade retained a significant association with survival when modeled with nuclear area. Neither worst nucleolar grade nor major nuclear axis/nuclear perimeter was significantly associated with survival when modeled together. In this study, we have shown that worst nucleolar grade and nuclear size are of prognostic significance for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. We have further shown the association of worst nucleolar grade with outcome to be independent of nuclear area, whereas it is a dependent variable when tested against other parameters of nuclear size. These findings indicate that worst nucleolar grading alone is a valid grading parameter for clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

These conditions disproportionately affect Māori and Pacific Islanders, particularly those living in high socioeconomic deprivation.

Cancer immunotherapy is well tolerated and specific, but its efficacy remains variable. To enhance anti-tumor CD8 + T-cell responses induced by immunization with antigen-loaded dendritic cells (DCs), we explored the impact of eliciting a potent source of T-cell help from activated invariant natural killer (NK)-like T cells (iNKT cells) using the specific glycolipid ligand a-galactosylceramide (a-GalCer). As cytokines released by iNKT cells may drive proliferation of CD4 + CD25 + regulatory T cells (Tregs), we assessed this immunization strategy in animals treated with anti-CD25 antibody to inactivate Treg function. Combining DC immunization with iNKT cell activation was found to significantly enhance anti-tumor activity, which was improved further by the prior inactivation of Tregs. The improved anti-tumor activity with Treg inactivation was associated with a prolonged proliferative burst of responding CD8 + T cells. We could find no evidence that inclusion of a-GalCer in the vaccine enhanced Treg numbers, or that the 'helper' function of iNKT cells was improved in the absence of Treg activity. Rather, the two activities appeared to act independently to improve the tumor-specific T-cell response. Inactivating regulatory T cells and eliciting iNKT cell activation are therefore two useful strategies that can be used in combination to improve anti-tumor immunization with antigen-loaded DCs.