In-situ lunar oxygen production has the potential to reduce the cargo mass launched from Earth necessary to sustain a lunar base. As research and development in lunar oxygen production continue, modeling tools are being used to help characterize the many possible system architectures and guide decisions for future plant designs. Using the previously built NASA In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) System Model, an optimization tool was developed to facilitate exploration of the design space of the different system architectures represented in the model. For each architecture, an optimization of the continuous design space is performed using a gradient-based search. In instances when the gradient-based search cannot converge, the tool changes to simulated annealing, a heuristic method. Nine primary lunar oxygen production system architectures were optimized to minimize system mass for oxygen production levels from 500 kg/yr to 6000 kg/yr. Good designs minimized mass and maximized produced oxygen with system masses in the range of 100 kg to 700 kg. Preliminary results show that two particular architectures populate the Pareto-optimal front of best designs for most production levels, making them attractive for further investigation. An economy of scale of .837 was found using a power law regression, indicating that some economy of scale exists (values less than one have economy of scale) and that launching fewer, higher-capacity plants will be less massive overall than many small-capacity plants to achieve the same total production level. A simplified comparison of lunar-produced oxygen for crew breathing supply and ECLSS (environmental control and life support systems) technologies was performed with a space logistics planning tool, SpaceNet. For all but the most advanced ECLSS technologies, use of in-situ oxygen over a 10-year campaign resulted in more than 12,000 kg of consumables cargo launch mass savings. Nomenclature = economy of scale C = investment cost
In 1978, a ground breaking paper titled, "Feasibility of Rocket Propellant Production on Mars" by Ash, Dowler, and Varsi discussed how ascent propellants could be manufactured on the Mars surface from carbon dioxide collected from the atmosphere to reduce launch mass. Since then, the concept of making mission critical consumables such as propellants, fuel cell reactants, and life support consumables from local resources, commonly known as In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU), for robotic and human missions to Mars has been studied many times. In the late 1990's, NASA initiated a series of Mars Human Design Reference Missions (DRMs), the first of which was released in 1997. These studies primarily focused on evaluating the impact of making propellants on Mars for crew ascent to Mars orbit, but creating large caches of life support consumables (water & oxygen) as a backup for regenerative life support systems for long-duration surface stays (>500 days) was also considered in Mars DRM 3.0. Until science data from the Mars Odyssey orbiter and subsequent robotic missions revealed that water may be widely accessable across the surface of Mars, prior Mars ISRU studies were limited to processing Mars atmospheric resources (carbon dioxide, nitrogen, argon, oxygen, and water vapor). In December 2007, NASA completed the Mars Human Design Reference Architecture (DRA) 5.0 study which considered water on Mars as a potential resource for the first time in a human mission architecture. While knowledge of both water resources on Mars and the hardware required to excavate and extract the water were very preliminary, the study concluded that a significant reduction in mass and significant enhancements to the mission architecture were possible if Mars water resources were utilized. Two subsequent Mars ISRU studies aimed at reexamining ISRU technologies, processing options, and advancements in the state-of-the-art since 2007 and to better understand the volume and packaging associated with Mars ISRU systems further substantiated the preliminary results from the Mars DRA 5.0 study. This paper will provide an overview of Mars ISRU consumable production options, the analyses, results, and conclusions from the Mars DRA 5.0 (2007), Mars Collaborative (2013), and Mars ISRU Payload for the Supersonic Retro Propulsion (2014) mission studies, and the current state-of-the-art of Mars ISRU technologies and systems. The paper will also briefly discuss the mission architectural implications associated with Mars resource and ISRU processing options.
The amount of waste generated on long-duration space missions away from Earth orbit creates the daunting challenge of how to manage the waste through reuse, rejection, or recycle. The option to merely dispose of the solid waste through an airlock to space was studied for both Earth-moon libration point missions and crewed Mars missions. Although the unique dynamic characteristics of an orbit around L2 might allow some discarded waste to intersect the lunar surface before re-impacting the spacecraft, the large amount of waste needed to be managed and potential hazards associated with volatiles recondensing on the spacecraft surfaces make this option problematic. A second option evaluated is to process the waste into useful gases to be either vented to space or used in various propulsion systems. These propellants could then be used to provide the yearly station-keeping needs at an L2 orbit, or if processed into oxygen and methane propellants, could be used to augment science exploration by enabling lunar mini landers to the far side of the moon.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.