This project examined the academic audit of postgraduate medical education, and went on to research, design and implement an educational audit system for use in Mersey Region, UK. Issues found to be significant included ownership of both standards and results, norming, and the levels of aggregation of data. The project has demonstrated that designing and implementing a system of feedback which is effective and sustainable is feasible, but requires the agreement and support of tutors as to its objectives and use. The resulting system has now been tested across a range of courses and programmes of meetings in Mersey Region, and has been accepted by the Postgraduate Office as the basis for future development.
Context and setting The University of WisconsinMadison's Internal Medicine Programme structures each resident's semi-annual review as a series of chapters authored jointly by the resident and the programme director. Residents self-assess their growth in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competencies (professionalism, communication, medical knowledge, practice-based learning and improvement, systems-based practice, patient care), evaluate their career development and professional-personal life balance, reflect on their strengths and gaps, and identify goals, objectives, tasks and monitoring strategies for selfimprovement. Then, during a 1-hour conversation with a programme director, residents align their opinions of their performance with multi-source evaluations (patients, peers, faculty) and prioritise specific commitments to change. Why the idea was necessary The commitment to change (CTC) strategy has been linked to improved medical practices in continuing medical education. Doctors who attend training and commit to a behavioural change later demonstrate improvements in practice compared with those who do not commit to change. Adoption of the CTC strategy during graduate medical education might similarly reduce the gap between residents' performance on the competencies and the programme's standards for best practices. What was done We recently formalised our semiannual review process by asking residents to document three self-selected and two externally driven (i.e. patient outcome core measure and patient safety) commitments to change. Residents also categorised progress on each of their prior goals as completed, not completed or not addressed at the end of residency. We analysed the content of residents' commitments, the types of advice summarised in directors' follow-up letters, and progress toward completion of residents' commitments across 3 years of semi-annual reviews for our class of 27 residents who graduated in 2008. Evaluation of results and impact Career issues, followed by a desire to increase medical knowledge, dominated residents' commitments. Residents effectively identified their competency gaps, allowing programme directors to target the low-hanging fruit, the high yield, and important areas with advice on how to identify mentors, prioritise goals and break down objectives into actionable tasks. Conversations necessarily revolved around externally driven, programme-specific competencies, organisational requirements (American Board of Internal Medicine, ACGME, Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations), fellowship and job seeking, which all residents eventually met. However, directors also consistently pushed residents to clarify their commitments within the internally driven areas of personal-professional balance, professionalism, communication and patient care. Outcome analyses indicated that residents were more successful at meeting externally driven patient safety (72%) and core measure (57%) commitments than at meeting internally dri...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.