No abstract

As health care systems move toward value-based care, training future leaders in quality improvement (QI) is essential. Web-based training allows for broad dissemination of QI knowledge to geographically distributed learners. The authors conducted a longitudinal evaluation of a structured, synchronous web-based, advanced QI curriculum that facilitated engagement and real-time feedback. Learners (n = 54) were satisfied (overall satisfaction; M = 3.31/4.00), and there were improvements in cognitive (immediate QI knowledge tests; P = .02), affective (self-efficacy of QI skills; P < .001), and skill-based learning (Quality Improvement Knowledge Application Tool; P < .001). There was significant improvement in affective transfer (interprofessional attitudes on the job; p < .01) but no significant change on cognitive (distal QI knowledge test; P = .91), or skill-based transfer (self-reported interprofessional collaboration job skills; P = .23). The findings suggest that this model can be effective to train geographically distributed future QI leaders.

Introduction Adverse events leading to patient harm are rarely the result of an individual error but are instead due to a series of errors resulting from system breakdowns. Thus, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires all residents to participate in quality improvement and patient safety programs. However, a major reported obstacle to sustainable quality improvement and patient safety curricula, as well as meaningful practice improvement, is the small number of faculty with expertise or training in these topics. Methods This workshop provides a simple framework for redesigning traditional morbidity and mortality conferences for faculty who have minimal quality improvement training. The materials associated with this publication include a standardized presentation template, sample teaching points, and a faculty facilitator's guide. Results Between August 2014 and February 2015, 135 trainees from one of our tertiary training sites attended seven of these redesigned conferences. The largest gains were made in teaching residents how to use a systems-based approach to analyze medical error and how to identify corresponding error-reduction strategies. Residents also perceived themselves as more likely to put their knowledge into action through filing an incident report after attending the conference. The one item that did not change was the residents' perception of safety culture at their institution, suggesting that attendance at a monthly conference is not sufficient to change culture. Discussion Similarly formatted M&Mconferences may help institutions address several aspectof the ACGME CLER program that provides programswith periodic feedback regarding trainee education onpatient safety and quality improvement as well.

Background: Hospitalized patients with advanced heart failure often experience acute and/or chronic pain. While virtual reality has been extensively studied across a wide range of clinical settings, no studies have yet evaluated potential impact on pain management on this patient population. Aim: To investigate the impact of a virtual reality experience on self-reported pain, quality-of-life, general distress, and satisfaction compared to a two-dimensional guided imagery active control. Design: Single-center prospective randomized controlled study. The primary outcome was the difference in pre- versus post-intervention self-reported pain scores on a numerical rating scale from 0 to 10. Secondary outcomes included changes in quality-of-life scores, general distress, and satisfaction with the intervention. Setting/participants: Between October 2018 and March 2020, 88 participants hospitalized with advanced heart failure were recruited from an urban tertiary academic medical center. Results: Participants experienced significant improvement in pain score after either 10 minutes of virtual reality (change from pre- to post −2.9 ± 2.6, p < 0.0001) or 10 minutes of guided imagery (change from pre- to post −1.3 ± 1.8, p = 0.0001); the virtual reality arm experienced a 1.5 unit comparatively greater reduction in pain score compared to guided imagery ( p = 0.0011). Total quality-of-life and general distress scores did not significantly change for either arm. Seventy-eight participants (89%) responded that they would be willing to use the assigned intervention again. Conclusion: Virtual reality may be an effective nonpharmacologic adjuvant pain management intervention in hospitalized patients with heart failure. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov database (NCT04572425).