Large osteoclasts (>or=10 nuclei) predominate at sites of pathological bone resorption. We hypothesized this was related to increased resorptive activity of large osteoclasts and have demonstrated previously that larger osteoclasts are 8-fold more likely to be resorbing than small osteoclasts (2-5 nuclei). Here we ask whether these differences in resorptive activity can be explained by differences in expression of factors involved in osteoclast signaling, fusion, attachment, and matrix degradation. Authentic rabbit osteoclasts and osteoclasts derived from RAW264.7 cells showed similar increases in c-fms expression (1.7- to 1.8-fold) in large osteoclasts suggesting that RAW cells are a viable system for further analysis. We found 2- to 4.5-fold increases in the expression of the integrins alpha(v) and beta(3), the proteases proMMP9, matMMP9 and pro-cathepsinK, and in activating receptors RANK, IL-1R1, and TNFR1 in large osteoclasts. In contrast, small osteoclasts had higher expression of the fusion protein SIRPalpha1 and the decoy receptor IL-1R2. The higher expression of activation receptors and lower expression of IL-1R2 in large osteoclasts suggest they are hyperresponsive to extracellular factors. This is supported by the observation that the resorptive activity in large osteoclasts was more responsive to IL-1beta, and that this increased activity was inhibited by the IL-1 receptor antagonist, IL-1ra. This increased responsiveness of large osteoclasts to IL-1 may, in part, explain the pathological bone loss noted in inflammatory diseases. The heterogeneity in receptor expression and the differential response to cytokines and their antagonists could prove useful for selective inhibition of large osteoclasts actively engaged in pathological bone loss.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.