Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are cardioprotective in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Besides, we have shown that intramyocardial injection of plasmid-VEGF(165) (pVEGF) in ovine AMI reduces infarct size and improves left ventricular (LV) function. We thus hypothesized that MSCs overexpressing VEGF(165) (MSCs-pVEGF) would afford greater cardioprotection than non-modified MSCs or pVEGF alone. Sheep underwent an anteroapical AMI and, 1 week later, received intramyocardial MSCs-pVEGF in the infarct border. One month post treatment, infarct size (magnetic resonance) decreased by 31% vs pre-treatment. Of note, myocardial salvage occurred predominantly at the subendocardium, the myocardial region displaying the largest contribution to systolic performance. Consistently, LV ejection fraction recovered to almost its baseline value because of marked decrease in end-systolic volume. None of these effects were observed in sheep receiving non-transfected MSCs or pVEGF. Although myocardial retention of MSCs decreased steeply over time, the treatment induced significant capillary and arteriolar proliferation, which reduced subendocardial fibrosis. We conclude that in ovine AMI, allogeneic VEGF-overexpressing MSCs induce subendocardial myocardium salvage through microvascular proliferation, reducing infarct size and improving LV function more than non-transfected MSCs or the naked plasmid. Importantly, the use of a plasmid rather than a virus allows for repeated treatments, likely needed in ischemic heart disease.

No abstract

We conclude that CAL-induced myocardial interstitial fibrosis and associated decline in left ventricular function were diminished with BZ or ETZ treatment. The reductions in cardiac remodeling in HF with both ETZ and BZ CA inhibitors suggest that inhibition of a membrane-bound CA appears to be the critical site for this protection.

No abstract

Tolerance to the pain-relieving effects of cannabinoids limits the therapeutic potential of these drugs in patients with chronic pain. Recent preclinical research with rodents and clinical studies in humans has suggested important differences between males and females in the development of tolerance to cannabinoids. Our previous work found that male mice expressing a desensitization resistant form (S426A/S430A) of the type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1R) show delayed tolerance and increased sensitivity to the antinociceptive effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (∆9-THC). Sex differences in tolerance have been reported in rodent models with females acquiring tolerance to ∆9-THC faster than males. However, it remains unknown whether the S426A/S430A mutation alters analgesic tolerance to ∆9-THC in mice with chemotherapy-evoked chronic neuropathic pain, and also whether this tolerance might be different between males and females. Male and female S426A/S430A mutant and wild-type littermates were made neuropathic using four once-weekly injections of 5 mg/kg cisplatin and subsequently assessed for tolerance to the anti-allodynic effects of 6 and/or 10 mg/kg ∆9-THC. Females acquired tolerance to the anti-allodynic effects of both 6 and 10 mg/kg ∆9-THC faster than males. In contrast, the S426A/S430A mutation did not alter tolerance to ∆9-THC in either male or female mice. The anti-allodynic effects of ∆9-THC were blocked following pretreatment with the CB1R antagonist, rimonabant, and partially blocked following pretreatment with the CB2R inverse agonist, SR144528. Our results show that disruption of the GRK/β-arrestin-2 pathway of desensitization did not affect sensitivity and/or tolerance to ∆9-THC in a chronic pain model of neuropathy.

Background Cannabigerol (CBG) is a non‐psychoactive phytocannabinoid produced by the plant Cannabis sativa with affinity to various receptors involved in nociception. As a result, CBG is marketed as an over‐the‐counter treatment for many forms of pain. However, there is very little research‐based evidence for the efficacy of CBG as an anti‐nociceptive agent. Methods To begin to fill this knowledge gap, we assessed the anti‐nociceptive effects of CBG in C57BL/6 mice using three different models of pain; cisplatin‐induced peripheral neuropathy, the formalin test, and the tail‐flick assay. Results Using the von Frey test, we found that CBG‐attenuated mechanical hypersensitivity evoked by cisplatin‐induced peripheral neuropathy in both male and female mice. Additionally, we observed that this CBG‐induced reduction in mechanical hypersensitivity was attenuated by the α2‐adrenergic receptor antagonist atipamezole (3 mg/kg, i.p.) and the CB1R antagonist, AM4113 (3 mg/kg, i.p.), and blocked by the CB2R antagonist/inverse agonist, SR144528 (10 mg/kg, i.p.). We found that the TRPV1 antagonist, SB705498 (20 mg/kg, i.p.) was unable to prevent CBG actions. Furthermore, we show that CBG:CBD oil (10 mg/kg, i.p.) was more effective than pure CBG (10 mg/kg) at reducing mechanical hypersensitivity in neuropathic mice. Lastly, we show that pure CBG and CBG:CBD oil were ineffective at reducing nociception in other models of pain, including the formalin and tail flick assays. Conclusions Our findings support the role of CBG in alleviating mechanical hypersensitivity evoked by cisplatin‐induced peripheral neuropathy, but highlight that these effects may be limited to specific types of pain. Significance There are few effective treatments for neuropathic pain and neuropathic pain is projected to increase with the aging population. We demonstrate that CBG (cannabigerol) and CBG:CBD oil attenuate neuropathy‐induced mechanical hypersensitivity mice. Second, we identify receptor targets that mediate CBG‐induced reduction in mechanical hypersensitivity in neuropathic mice. Third, we demonstrate that an acute injection of CBG is anti‐nociceptive specifically for neuropathic pain rather than other forms of pain, including persistent pain and thermal pain.

No abstract

No abstract