Objective: Teaching profession is characterised by an above-average rate of psychosomatic and mental health impairment due to work-related stress. The aim of the study was to identify predictors of mental health in female teachers. Material and Methods: A sample of 630 female teachers (average age 47±7 years) participated in a screening diagnostic inventory. Mental health was surveyed with the General Health Questionnaire GHQ-12. The following parameters were measured: specific work conditions (teacher-specific occupational history), scales of the Effort-Reward-Imbalance (ERI) Questionnaire as well as cardiovascular risk factors, physical complaints (BFB) and personal factors such as inability to recover (FABA), sense of coherence (SOC) and health behaviour. Results: First, mentally fit (MH + ) and mentally impaired teachers (MH -) were differentiated based on the GHQ-12 sum score (MH + : < 5; MH -: ≥ 5); 18% of the teachers showed evidence of mental impairment. There were no differences concerning work-related and cardiovascular risk factors as well as health behaviour between MH + and MH -. Binary logistic regressions identified 4 predictors that showed a significant effect on mental health. The effort-reward-ratio proved to be the most relevant predictor, while physical complaints as well as inability to recover and sense of coherence were identified as advanced predictors (explanation of variance: 23%). Conclusion: Contrary to the expectations, classic work-related factors can hardly contribute to the explanation of mental health. Additionally, cardiovascular risk factors and health behaviour have no relevant influence. However, effort-rewardratio, physical complaints and personal factors are of considerable influence on mental health in teachers. These relevant predictors should become a part of preventive arrangements for the conservation of teachers' health in the future.

BackgroundAccording to international study results, physical therapists are afflicted with work-related musculoskeletal, psychosocial and dermal disorders as well as infections. The few existing studies in German-speaking regions focus mainly on dermal and psychosocial exposures and resulting complaints. An overview of all relevant work-related exposures and complaints of physical therapists is currently lacking.We sought to identify work-related exposures based on the subjective experiences and beliefs of physiotherapeutic representatives, in order to identify relevant work-related complaints and diseases. Likewise we aimed to compare the international evidence with the actual situation of physical therapists in Germany.MethodsTwo complementary qualitative approaches were used: 1) a focus group discussion with representatives of professional physiotherapy associations as well as health and safety stakeholders and 2) qualitative semi-structured telephone interviews incorporating currently employed physical therapists. The group discussion was conducted applying a moderation technique, and interviews were analyzed using the content analysis approach by Mayring.ResultsThe focus group discussion with five participants and the 40 semi-structured interviews with physical therapists identified comparable results. The main exposures of physiotherapeutic work were considered to be musculoskeletal (e.g., awkward body postures during treatment, patient transfers, passive mobilization), psychosocial (e.g., statutory audit of prescriptions and the associated conflicts with doctors and health insurance providers) and partly dermal and infectious (e.g., wet work and risk of infection) factors. Diseases of the spine, wrist or finger joints, burnout syndrome and infections were mentioned as possible consequences.ConclusionsThe subjective data generated by both groups (focus group discussion and interviews) were comparable and consistent with the current state of research. The results provide new insight regarding work-related exposures and diseases of physical therapists working in Germany. These findings aided the design of a German-wide representative survey of practicing physical therapists.

Background Comprehensive data are needed to evaluate the burden of low birthweight. Analysis of routine data on health-care utilization during early childhood were used to test the hypothesis that infants with low birthweight have (i) increased inpatient health-care utilization, (ii) higher hospital costs and (iii) different morbidity pattern in early childhood when compared with normal birthweight infants. Methods Children born between 2007 and 2013 that were insured at birth with the statutory health insurance AOK PLUS were included ( N = 118,166, equaling 49% of the Saxon newborns) and classified into very low (< 1500 g, VLBW), low (1500-2499 g, LBW) birthweight and reference group ( > 2500 g). Outcomes were: inpatient health-care utilization quantified by number and length of hospital stays; costs of hospitalizations including medication; reasons of hospitalizations for each year of life (YOL). Results 72, 38 and 22% of VLBW-, LBW- and reference group were hospitalized after perinatal period within the first YOL with a more than 5-fold increased risk in VLBW to be hospitalized for hemangioma, convulsions, hydrocephalus, hernia and respiratory problems. Median (IQR) cumulative cost of inpatient care during the first four YOLs was 2953 (1213-7885), 1331 (0–3451) and 0 (0–2062) Euro for respective groups. Inpatient early childhood health-care utilization (after first YOL) was higher in VLBW compared to healthy, normal birth weight infants (RR 3.92 [95%-CI 3.63, 4.23]), residents of rural areas (RR 1.37 [95%-CI 1.35, 1.40]) and in boys (RR 1.31 [95%-CI 1.29, 1.33]). Conclusion This large population-based birth-cohort study indicates a high clinical and economic burden of low birthweight which is not restricted to the first year of life. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12887-019-1424-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.