Documents received during the tender, are in the form of drawings, specifications, bill of quantity (BQ), and the general terms of the contract. Tender activity will bring a variety of risks during the project implementation, and this research is done to identify and assessment of risks, mitigating risk and determining the ownership of the dominant risk.The research was conducted on a private building construction project at Badung Regency in Bali, by using a qualitative method and data collection was done through interview, brainstorming with experts and questionnaires. Among the 39 risk identified, 15 risks were obtained from the previous research, and the remaining 24 risks in this research.The results of this risk assessment were that 18 risks (46.2%) categorized into unacceptable, that include: the addition items of work, the drawing does not match with plan, and the changes in the material specifications. Risk assessment fell into the undesirable category that 21 risks (53.8%), including the mismatch information from planners, the arithmetic error, and materials used were not available on the market. Mitigation was done to dominant risk, among others by reassessing, submitting the contract change order, and asking questions. The biggest risk of ownership was the contractor, namely 39 risks with 18 unacceptable and 21 undesirable risks, this mean, problems associated with tender documents should receive the attention to contractors, planner consultants, owners and Quantity Surveyor (QS) consultants. Contractors as the recipient of the biggest risk were expected to increase the competence of those involved in the tender process.
In the implementation of the road maintenance project always risks arise. These risks have an impact on stakeholders related to the execution of the project, the community of road users and the surrounding environment. These risks need to be studied, managed, and assessed as a risk-mitigation effort for stakeholders. As the case study is the district road maintenance project, in Badung regency of Bali. Descriptive method used in the study. Identification of variable risk used STEPLE (Social, Technology, Economy, Politics, Legal, and Environment) method. The factors STEPLE is identified through literature review and brainstorming, then used as a questionnaire instrument. Respondents are experts involved in road maintenance projects in Badung regency. Risk assessment uses a risk assessment matrix. The results of the study found 36 risks. These risks are identified as dominant from the Technical variable that is 13 risks. Risk assessment found is 6 risks classified as unacceptable, and 30 risk classified as undesirable.
Pada pelaksanaan proyek konstruksi di Kabupaten Badung tahun anggaran 2019-2020 terdapat 31 paket pekerjaan dari total 118 paket pekerjaan proyek konstruksi yang mengalami keterlambatan dari jadwal yang ditetapkan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk menganalisis faktor penyebab keterlambatan dan merumuskan upaya penanggulangan keterlambatan pelaksanaan proyek konstruksi di Kabupaten Badung. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan cara menyebarkan kuesioner yang melibatkan 40 responden yang terkait dalam pelaksanaan proyek konstruksi di Kabupaten Badung tahun 20192020. Analisis Relatif Important Indeks (RII) digunakan untuk menentukan peringkat faktor penting yang menyebabkan keterlambatan pelaksanaan proyek konstruksi. Metode Focus Group Discussion (FGD) digunakan untuk merumuskan upaya penanggulangan keterlambatan pelaksanaannya. Hasil Analisis RII menunjukkan faktor yang paling berpengaruh yaitu Faktor Tenaga Kerja (Labors) dengan nilai RII sebesar 0.842. Upaya penanggulangan keterlambatan dirumuskan melalui metode Focus Group Discussion (FGD) yang mencakup upaya peningkatkan keterampilan pekerja dengan cara pemberian edukasi dan pelatihan secara rutin, memperhatikan kebersihan dan kelayakan tempat tinggal pekerja karena tempat tinggal pekerja yang tidak sehat dapat menyebabkan tingginya angka pekerja yang sakit, pemantauan kedisiplinan tenaga kerja, mengadakan pertemuan atau safety talk untuk membahas kendala kendala yang terjadi di lapangan serta memberikan arahan terkait scope pekerjaan, pengaturan area persebaran para pekerja agar masih dapat termonitor dengan baik. In the implementation of construction projects in Badung Regency in the year 2019-2020, 31 work packages out of a total of 118 work packages, encountered delays from the set schedule. This research aims to discover the important factors causing project’s delays and to formulate efforts to manage delays on construction projects in Badung Regency. Descriptive method was used in this study. Data collection method was conducted through a questionnaire survey that was distributed to 40 respondents, who were involved in the implementation of construction projects in Badung Regency, in the year 2019-2020. Respondents' responses were tabulated and analysed by using the Relative Important Index (RII) analysis to discover the factors that mostly effected on construction project delays. Then the related mitigation to overcome the delays were formulated based on the result of a Focus Group Discussion (FGD). The results showed Labor Factor had the most influencing factor, with an RII value of 0.842. Through the Focus Group Discussion, the mitigation formulated for the delays in construction project implementation caused by the labour factor, were: providing training regularly to improve workers’ skills and abilities, take notice to the cleanliness and appropriateness of workers' living quarters because an unhealthy worker's place can cause a high number of sick workers, monitoring labours’ discipline, holding meetings or safety talks routinely to discuss the deterrents that happen in the field and provide directions to workers so they understand the scope of work, and adjusting workers’ work distribution area, so they can be monitored optimally.
The project implementation process from planning to implementation sometimes encounters problems ranging from cost, quality and time. In the implementation process, there are obstacles, namely the soil conditions in the image do not match the actual conditions and the architectural work undergoes a design change, because the previously planned floor plan does not match the desired function. These problems lead to the need for additional costs and additional time for project completion. This study aims to identify, assess risk acceptance to determine dominant risk, mitigate risk and determine risk ownership that will be obtained as a result of these problems. The study used a qualitative descriptive method. Data were collected by means of brainstorming, interviews, observations and questionnaires. Questionnaires were distributed to 28 respondents. The results show that there are 40 valid risk identifications. There are 10 unacceptable risks and 21 undesirable risks which include dominant risk and 9 acceptable risks that do not require mitigation measures. Mitigation is carried out with 3 types of actions, namely by reducing, transferring and holding risks. The dominant risk is unacceptable, namely the occurrence of design changes more than once. Mitigation is done by ensuring the design is approved by all parties involved or who have an interest in the design to be carried out such as the owner or management of the hospital so that the design is in accordance with the desired function so that there is no design change more than once. The allocation of ownership of the largest risk is the responsibility of the contractor, namely the risk of financial problems to the contractor. The dominant risk impact on the additional cost and time added to this work has a major impact on the technical and project aspects. The total amount of additional costs is Rp. 10,825.600.000,- and the total additional time is 117 days on the project.
Construction projects in Denpasar City have directly experienced the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, which has brought about major changes in the construction sector which have been deeply felt by project stakeholders. The impacts include aspects of human resources, materials and equipment, work methods, and finances. The problems described have the potential to affect the performance of construction projects. The purpose of this research is to analyze the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the performance of construction projects in Denpasar City and formulate strategies to improve the performance of construction projects that are dominantly affected by the Covid-19 pandemic. Technical analysis of the data was determined using multivariate analysis with data obtained through surveys with online questionnaires and analyzed using SmartPLS software; Focus Group Discussions (FGD) and fishbone diagrams were conducted. The results of this study concluded that the Covid-19 pandemic had an impact on the performance of construction projects in Denpasar City, especially on the human resource aspect in terms of 2.5% time, 0.9% in terms of costs; material and equipment aspects in terms of time 3.0%, in terms of cost 1.2%, in terms of quality 0.1%; aspects of work methods in terms of time 3.4%, in terms of cost 0.7%, in terms of quality 0.7%; and the financial aspect in terms of costs 4.9%, in terms of time 1.5%. The Covid-19 pandemic variable that has the most impact on the performance of construction projects is the material and equipment aspect of 3.321 from the P-value calculation. Strategies to improve the performance of construction projects include providing equivalent alternative materials, studying contracts with suppliers in more detail, re-scheduling, monitoring related to material expeditions, pre-ordering first to suppliers, changing work methods, and seeking to find other heavy equipment service providers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.