Discriminatory treatments of judges have dominated the reports to the Judicial Commission. Injustice, in fact, is one of the lowest value attitudes of judges according to Judicial Commission assessment results. Indeed, showing justice is not easy for judges but to date in its development appears restorative justice that provides justice for all parties. Its future existence and response are interesting to be criticized. Based on this, the purpose of this study is to examine the paradigm of restorative justice in making legal decisions of judges on legal cases and the construction of the judges’ decisions which are paradigmatic in Restorative Justice. This research uses normative legal research with four types of approaches, which are case approach, legislative approach, conceptual approach, historical approach, and comparative approach. The results of the study show the restorative justice paradigm prioritizing restoration or amelioration will seek to provide justice, certainty and usefulness of the law, as well as realize progressive and responsive laws, and this makes it appropriate to be used as a judge’s paradigm in deciding a case. In constructing restorative justice-based judges’ decisions, judges do only make decisions based on the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), but substantially, through the restorative justice paradigm the judges will consider justice for all parties (victims, perpetrators of crime, and the public). Judges do not make decisions based on retributive or retaliation goals but hold on to the values, concepts, principles, and basics of restorative justice prioritizing restoration or amelioration of the parties, meeting the needs of the parties, and prioritizing expediency.   Discriminatory treatments of judges have dominated the reports to the Judicial Commission. Injustice, in fact, is one of the lowest value attitudes of judges according to Judicial Commission assessment results. Indeed, showing justice is not easy for judges but to date in its development appears restorative justice that provides justice for all parties. Its future existence and response are interesting to be criticized. Based on this, the purpose of this study is to examine the paradigm of restorative justice in making legal decisions of judges on legal cases and the construction of the judges’ decisions which are paradigmatic in Restorative Justice. This research uses normative legal research with four types of approaches, which are case approach, legislative approach, conceptual approach, historical approach, and comparative approach. The results of the study show the restorative justice paradigm prioritizing restoration or amelioration will seek to provide justice, certainty and usefulness of the law, as well as realize progressive and responsive laws, and this makes it appropriate to be used as a judge’s paradigm in deciding a case. In constructing restorative justice-based judges’ decisions, judges do only make decisions based on the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), but substantially, through the restorative justice paradigm the judges will consider justice for all parties (victims, perpetrators of crime, and the public). Judges do not make decisions based on retributive or retaliation goals but hold on to the values, concepts, principles, and basics of restorative justice prioritizing restoration or amelioration of the parties, meeting the needs of the parties, and prioritizing expediency.  

Terjadinya pandemi COVID-19 secara tidak langsung berimbas pada perekonomian nasional dan menyebabkan turunnya pendapatan masyarakat. Hal ini menjadi tantangan tersendiri bagi dunia bisnis termasuk juga pada industri jasa keuangan perbankan. Tujuan penelitian ini diantaranya untuk mengindentifikasi dampak pandemi COVID-19 terhadap sektor perbankan, untuk mengidentifikasi apakah pandemi COVID-19 dapat digolongkan sebagai suatu keadaan kahar (force majeure) yang dapat menghapuskan kewajiban kredit dan mengidentifikasi langkah-langkah penyelamatan kredit yang dilakukan oleh pihak Perbankan dalam mengatasi Non Performing Loan (NPL) akibat adanya pandemi COVID-19. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan penelitian lapangan (yuridis empiris) dengan lokasi penelitian pada bank umum milik pemerintah daerah, bank umum milik swasta dan bank perkreditan rakyat di Bali. Penelitian ini memperoleh hasil bahwa Pandemi COVID-19 berdampak bagi operasional bank, menurunnya aktivitas penyimpanan dana di bank, menurunnya pertumbuhan kredit, serta meningkatnya Non Performing Loan (NPL). Pandemi COVID-19 digolongkan sebagai force majeure relative yang tidak menghapuskan kewajiban kredit dan hanya menangguhkan kewajiban. Upaya yang dilakukan oleh pihak bank adalah restrukturisasi kredit, melakukan pemantauan dan monitoring, serta melakukan penambahan fasilitas kredit. Terdapat perbedaan implementasi antara bentuk restrukturisasi yang diatur dalam POJK dengan pelaksanaannya di lapangan.

Penyandang disabilitas sering sekali kurang mendapat perhatian, seperti mendapat perlakuan yang berbeda atau diskriminasi. Kurangnya akses juga menjadi penghambat kehidupan seharihari para penyandang disabilitas. Harapan bagi para penyandang disabilitas untuk memperoleh pekerjaan bisa dikatakan kecil dibanding mereka yang tidak memiliki cacat fisik. Yayasan atau organisasi nirlaba dapat dikatakan memiliki peran kuat dalam menghadapi berbagai masalah yang tengah terjadi. Ketimpangan antara perkembangan pesat pariwisata Bali dengan pemenuhan hak-hak dasar dari kaum disabilitas telah mulai dijembatani melalui keberadaan yayasan atau organisasi nirlaba. Jenis penelitian ini adalah jenis penelitian hukum empiris, yaitu metode pendekatan yang digunakan untuk memecahkan suatu objek penelitian dengan cara meneliti data sekunder terhadap data primer yang ada dilapangan. Hasil studi menunjukkan perlakuan tenaga kerja penyandang disabilitas dalam Yayasan di Bali telah sesuai dengan peraturan yang berlaku dimana pihak Yayasan sudah melindungi dan mengakomodasi hak-hak pekerja penyandang disabilitas tanpa adanya diskriminasi dan perbedaan, seluruh peraturan perundang-undangan telah diimplementasikan dengan baik oleh pihak yayasan guna memenuhi  kebutuhan para pekerja penyandang disabilitas terutama pada dunia kerja. People with disabilities often receive less attention, different treatment, or discrimination. Limited access also becomes a barrier to their daily lives. They get smaller chances to get a job compared to those non-disabled. Foundations or non-profit organizations have a strong role in dealing with current issues. The organization has bridged the disparity between the rapid development of Bali tourism and the fulfillment of the basic rights of people with disabilities. The purpose of writing this journal is to determine the rights of workers with disabilities based on the prevailing laws and regulations in Indonesia and to find out the forms of treatment for workers with disabilities who work at foundations in Bali. This type of research is a type of empirical legal research, namely the approach method used to solve an object of research by examining secondary data against primary data in the field. The study results show the treatment received by workers with disabilities in a non-profit organization in Bali has been appropriate with the applicable regulations with the protection and accommodation of workers with disabilities without discrimination and differences. All laws and regulations have been implemented well by the foundation to meet the needs of workers with disabilities particularly in the world of work.

The Corona Virus (Covid-19) pandemic is a challenge for humans to transform life activities, so that people have to adapt to changes in human activities, along with the addition of positive cases of the Covid-19 corona virus, the government enforces the Work from Home (WFH) policy. Likewise, the judicial apparatus must carry out its obligations to carry out trials, with the existence of online court media being an alternative in conducting virtual trials/teleconferences, this is a new breakthrough in conducting trials. So that people get justice and the right to get a legal process   Keywords: the judge, online media, Corona Virus (covid-19)