Executive Summary BackgroundThis Commission addresses several priority areas for psychiatry over the next decade, and into the 21st century. These represent challenges and opportunities for the profession to sustain and develop itself to secure the best possible future for the millions of people worldwide who will face life with mental illness. Part 1: The patient and treatmentWho will psychiatrists help? The patient population of the future will reflect general demographic shifts towards older, more urban, and migrant populations. While technical advances such as the development of biomarkers will potentially alter diagnosis and treatment, and digital tech-nology will facilitate assessment of remote populations, the human elements of practice such as cultural sensitivity and the ability to form a strong therapeutic alliance with the patient will remain central. Part 2: Psychiatry and health-care systemsDelivering mental health services to those who need them will require reform of the traditional structure of services. Few existing models have evidence of clinical effectiveness and acceptability to service users. Services of the future should consider stepped care, increased use of multidisciplinary teamwork, more of a public health approach, and the integration of mental and physical health care. These services will need to fit into the cultural and economic framework of a diverse range of settings in high-income, low-income, and middle-income countries. Part 3: Psychiatry and societyIncreased emphasis on social interventions and engagement with societal expectations might be an important a ea fo ps hiat s de elop e t. This ould e o pass ad o a fo the ights of individuals living with mental illnesses, political involvement concerning the social risk factors for mental illness, and, on a smaller scale, work with families and local social networks and communities. Psychiatrists should therefore possess communication skills and knowledge of the social sciences as well as the basic biological sciences. Part 4: The future of mental health lawMental health law worldwide tends to be based on concerns about risk rather than the protection of the rights of individuals experiencing mental illness. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which states that compulsion based in whole or in part on mental disability is discriminatory, is a landmark document that should inform the future formulation and reform of mental health laws. An evidence-based approach needs to be taken: mental health legislation should mandate mental health training for all health professionals; ensure access to good-quality care; and cover wider societal issues, particularly access to housing, resources, and employment. All governments should include a mental health impact assessment when drafting relevant legislation. Part 5: Digital psychiatry-enhancing the future of mental healthDigital technology might offer psychiatry the potential for radical change in terms of service delivery and the development of new treatm...

Background Disorders affecting mental health are highly prevalent, can be disabling, and are associated with substantial premature mortality. Yet national health system responses are frequently under-resourced, inefficient, and ineffective, leading to an imbalance between disease burden and health expenditures. We estimated the disease burden in the Americas caused by disorders affecting mental health. This measure was adjusted to include mental, neurological, and behavioural disorders that are frequently not included in estimates of mental health burden. We propose a framework for assessing the imbalance between disease burden and health expenditures. MethodsIn this cross-sectional, ecological study, we extracted disaggregated disease burden data from the Global Health Data Exchange to produce country-level estimates for the proportion of total disease burden attributable to mental disorders, neurological disorders, substance use disorders, and self-harm (MNSS) in the Americas. We collated data from the WHO Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems and the WHO Mental Health Atlas on country-level mental health spending as a proportion of total government health expenditures, and of psychiatric hospital spending as a proportion of mental health expenditures. We used a metric capturing the imbalance between disease burden and mental health expenditures, and modelled the association between this imbalance and real (ie, adjusted for purchasing power parity) gross domestic product (GDP). FindingsData were collected from July 1, 2016, to March 1, 2017. MNSS comprised 19% of total disability-adjusted lifeyears in the Americas in 2015. Median spending on mental health was 2•4% (IQR 1•3-4•1) of government health spending, and median allocation to psychiatric hospitals was 80% (52-92). This spending represented an imbalance in the ratio between disease burden and efficiently allocated spending, ranging from 3:1 in Canada and the USA to 435:1 in Haiti, with a median of 32:1 (12-170). Mental health expenditure as a proportion of government health spending was positively associated with real GDP (β=0•68 [95% CI 0•24-1•13], p=0•0036), while the proportion allocated to psychiatric hospitals (β=-0•5 [-0•79 to -0•22], p=0•0012) and the imbalance in efficiently allocated spending (β=-1•38 [-1•97 to -0•78], p=0•0001) were both inversely associated with real GDP. All estimated coefficients were significantly different from zero at the 0•005 level.Interpretation A striking imbalance exists between government spending on mental health and the related disease burden in the Americas, which disproportionately affects low-income countries and is likely to result in undertreatment, increased avoidable disability and mortality, decreased national economic output, and increased household-level health spending.

RESUMEN Objetivo Recabar y ofrecer información a quienes toman decisiones en los programas de salud en general, y de salud mental en particular, sobre las características epidemiológicas del suicidio de jóvenes y adolescentes ecuatorianos. Método Se realizó un estudio ecológico transversal con datos de los registros de mortalidad por suicidio de los jóvenes y adolescentes de Ecuador de 2001 a 2014. El análisis se desagregó por región natural, sexo, edad, grupo étnico y por el método usado para cometer el suicidio. Se estimaron tasas de mortalidad por suicidio (por 100 000 habitantes) y los riesgos relativos (RR) de suicidio por sexo y regiones. Resultados Entre 2001 y 2014 se registraron 4 855 suicidios en adolescentes y jóvenes. El riesgo más alto se estimó en los varones de 15 a 24 años y en los adolescentes residentes en la Amazonía, seguidos por los de la Sierra. La etnia con más casos de suicidio fueron los mestizos, aunque 40% de los jóvenes que se suicidan en la Amazonía son indígenas. El método más frecuente fue el ahorcamiento seguido por el envenenamiento con pesticidas. Conclusiones El suicidio de adolescentes y jóvenes es un problema de salud pública importante en Ecuador. Como en él influyen diversos factores psicológicos, sociales y culturales, se observan grandes variaciones según la región, los grupos de edad y las etnias. La restricción del acceso a pesticidas y a otros productos químicos, los programas de prevención universales y en centros educativos en las áreas con las tasas más altas, y las intervenciones específicas dirigidas a grupos vulnerables podrían ayudar a reducir los suicidios de jóvenes en Ecuador.

No abstract

The countries and territories comprising the English-speaking Caribbean (ESC) have made some strides in the development of mental health policy, services and systems with the expenditure in mental health as a percentage of health budgets ranging from 1% to 7%. The ESC countries have well developed primary healthcare systems. However, mental health legislations in many countries are in need of reform. Some countries have developed an innovative community based, secondary care treatment model: treatment in the medical wards of general hospitals. These countries have made progress in integrating mental health into primary healthcare and have made psychotropic medication widely available at the primary care level. Notwithstanding the progress in some countries, greater effort is required in phasing out mental hospitals and integrating mental health into primary care in other ESC countries.

Introduction Mental, neurological and substance use conditions lead to tremendous suffering, yet globally access to effective care is limited. In line with the 13th General Programme of Work (GPW 13), in 2019 the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the WHO Special Initiative for Mental Health: Universal Health Coverage for Mental Health to advance mental health policies, advocacy, and human rights and to scale up access to quality and affordable care for people living with mental health conditions. Six countries were selected as ‘early-adopter’ countries for the WHO Special Initiative for Mental Health in the initial phase. Our objective was to rapidly and comprehensively assess the strength of mental health systems in each country with the goal of informing national priority-setting at the outset of the Initiative. Methods We used a modified version of the Program for Improving Mental Health Care (PRIME) situational analysis tool. We used a participatory process to document national demographic and population health characteristics; environmental, sociopolitical, and health-related threats; the status of mental health policies and plans; the prevalence of mental disorders and treatment coverage; and the availability of resources for mental health. Results Each country had distinct needs, though several common themes emerged. Most were dealing with crises with serious implications for population mental health. None had sufficient mental health services to meet their needs. All aimed to decentralize and deinstitutionalize mental health services, to integrate mental health care into primary health care, and to devote more financial and human resources to mental health systems. All cited insufficient and inequitably distributed specialist human resources for mental health as a major impediment. Conclusions This rapid assessment facilitated priority-setting for mental health system strengthening by national stakeholders. Next steps include convening design workshops in each country and initiating monitoring and evaluation procedures.

No abstract

No abstract