Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow alterations in meningitis using phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PCMRI). Materials and Methods: Fifty patients with clinically confirmed or strongly suspected infectious meningitis and 20 controls were evaluated with MRI. Quantitative CSF analysis was performed at the level of cerebral aqueduct using cardiac-gated PCMRI. Velocity encoding (Venc) was kept at 20 cm/s. Patients were subdivided into Group I (patients with hydrocephalus [n = 21]) and Group II (patients without hydrocephalus [n = 29]). Results: The mean peak velocity and stroke volume in controls were 2.49 ± 0.86 cm/s and 13.23 ± 6.84 µl and in patients were 2.85 ± 2.90 cm/s and 16.30 ± 20.02 µl, respectively. A wide variation of flow parameters was noted in meningitis irrespective of the degree of ventricular dilatation. A significant difference in peak velocity and stroke volume was noted in Group II as compared to controls. Viral meningitis showed milder alteration of CSF flow dynamics as compared to bacterial and tuberculous etiologies. At a cutoff value of 3.57 cm/s in peak CSF velocity, the specificity was 100% and sensitivity was 22.7% to differentiate between viral and non-viral meningitis. Conclusion: Alteration of CSF flow dynamics on PCMRI can improve segregation of patients into viral and non- viral etiologies, especially in those in whom contrast is contraindicated or not recommended. This may aid in institution of appropriate clinical treatment.

No abstract

Introduction: Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) is the standard of care for renal tumors, especially in the early stages. RENAL Nephrometry scores provide a comprehensive presurgical predictive module for the choice of NSS or Radical Nephrectomy. The validity and reliability of Nephrometry scores is being tested continuously with advancement in the surgical techniques. The Simplified PADUA Nephrometry score (SPARE NS) is a newer proposed score which aims to better the reproducibility of the previously established nephrometry scores. Materials and Methods: The retrospective observational study studied the comparative inter-observer reliability of RENAL (RENAL NS) and SPARE nephrometry scoring systems amongst two radiologists while assessing solid renal tumors in contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans of 42 patients. Interobserver reliability for all components of both scores, final scores and risk grading was done by Kendall’s Concordance Coefficient (Tau). Results: Both RENAL NS and SPARE NS showed strong to excellent agreement (RENAL NS = 78.57% and SPARE NS = 88.09%) among observers with comparable correlation co-efficient (RENAL NS = 0.944 and SPARE NS = 0.935). Lesion radius and exophytic/endophytic properties were the most reproducible components of RENAL NS with 97.61% and 92.85% agreement, respectively. Location across polar lines was the least reproducible component with 85.71% agreement among observers. Exophytic rate (97.61%) and Rim location were the most reproducible components of SPARE NS. The final lesion risk stratification by both observers for both was concordant in 92.85% of cases. Conclusion: The SPARE system of scoring matches up to the RENAL NS in total score and risk stratification reproducibility. However, the individual components of the SPARE score are more reproducible than those of RENAL NS, bringing about better compliance among radiology consultants. Comparable reproducibility with the RENAL NS, lesser number of variables, and ease of doing make SPARE NS a plausible option for the customary preoperative assessment of renal tumors.

Introduction: Soft tissue vascular anomalies present a diagnostic challenge. In these anomalies, imaging is crucial for therapeutic planning and improvement of prognosis. Ultrasound (US) and Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CEMRI) are both widely utilised and are valuable imaging modalities, both having distinct advantages and limitations in evaluation of such lesions. Aim: To evaluate soft tissue vascular anomalies using US and CEMRI and assess their agreement in characterisation of these lesions. Materials and Methods: The prospective study included 75 patients with vascular anomalies evaluated by means of US and CEMRI: 71 underwent both US and MRI, three underwent US alone, and one patient underwent MRI alone. Patients of all ages were included. Lesions were characterised based on imaging findings and vascular perfusion characteristics. Histopathological evaluation was done in all patients. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used for differentiating data. The agreement of US and CEMRI with histopathological diagnosis were assessed using kappa statistics. Results: Among the soft tissue vascular anomalies, 17 were haemangiomas, 55 were vascular malformations and 3 were other vascular tumours. Majority of the lesions were venous malformations (n=26; 34.66%). A cut-off value of 17.5 cm/sec of peak venous velocity using Colour Doppler showed 100% sensitivity in differentiating Arterio-Venous Malformations (AVM) from haemangiomas using ROC curves. Agreement expressed as kappa was 0.884 (95% CI 0.794-0.973) for US and 0.923 (95% CI 0.850-0.996) for CEMRI demonstrating near perfect agreement with histopathology in both. Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that both US and CEMRI are accurate in detection and characterisation of soft tissue vascular anomalies showing comparable level of agreement. US may be the preferred imaging modality as it is widely available, relatively inexpensive and non invasive. Contrast enhanced MRI may be reserved as a complementary technique in cases wherein lesion categorisation or extent is ambiguous during diagnosis.