Recent US consensus guidelines appear to have led to an increased use of PT in our NICUs and studies from Norway indicate that we use PT considerably more frequently and for longer durations than do our Norwegian colleagues.
There is a paucity of literature reporting the outcome of intracranial sarcomas (IS) in children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYA). A multimodal therapeutic approach is commonly used, with no well-established treatment consensus. We conducted a retrospective review of CAYA with IS, treated at our institution, to determine their clinical findings, treatments, and outcomes. Immunohistochemistry (PDGFRA and EGFR) and DNA sequencing were performed on 5 tumor samples. A literature review of IS was also conducted. We reviewed 13 patients (median age, 7 years) with a primary diagnosis of IS between 1990 and 2015. Diagnoses included unclassified sarcoma (n = 9), chondrosarcoma (n = 2), and rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 2). Five patients underwent upfront gross total resection (GTR) of the tumor. The 5-drug regimen (vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and ifosfamide) was the most common treatment used. Nine patients died due to progression or recurrence (n = 8) or secondary malignancy (n = 1). The median follow-up period of the 4 surviving patients was 1.69 years (range 1.44–5.17 years). The 5-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 21 and 44 %, respectively. BRAF, TP53, KRAS, KIT, ERBB2, MET, RET, ATM, and EGFR mutations were detected in 4 of the 5 tissue samples. All 5 samples were immunopositive for PDGFRA, and only 2 were positive for EGFR. IS remain a therapeutic challenge due to high progression and recurrence rates. Collaborative multi-institutional studies are warranted to delineate a treatment consensus and investigate tumor biology to improve the disease outcome.
<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Gastroschisis is the most common congenital abdominal wall defect with a rising prevalence. Infants with gastroschisis are at risk for multiple complications, leading to a potential increased risk for hospital readmission after discharge. We aimed to find the frequency and factors associated with an increased risk of readmission. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective analysis of infants born with gastroschisis between 2013 and 2019 who received initial surgical intervention and follow-up care in the Children’s Wisconsin health system was performed. The primary outcome was the frequency of hospital readmission within 1 year of discharge. We also compared maternal and infant clinical and demographic variables between those readmitted for reasons related to gastroschisis, and those readmitted for other reasons or not readmitted. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Forty of 90 (44%) infants born with gastroschisis were readmitted within 1-year of the initial discharge date, with 33 (37%) of the 90 infants being readmitted due to reasons directly related to gastroschisis. The presence of a feeding tube (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), a central line at discharge (<i>p</i> = 0.007), complex gastroschisis (<i>p</i> = 0.045), conjugated hyperbilirubinemia (<i>p</i> = 0.035), and the number of operations during the initial hospitalization (<i>p</i> = 0.044) were associated with readmission. Maternal race/ethnicity was the only maternal variable associated with readmission, with Black race being less likely to be readmitted (<i>p</i> = 0.003). Those who were readmitted were also more likely to be seen in outpatient clinics and utilize emergency healthcare resources. There was no statistically significant difference in readmission based on socioeconomic factors (all <i>p</i> > 0.084). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Infants with gastroschisis have a high hospital readmission rate, which is associated with a variety of risk factors including complex gastroschisis, multiple operations, and the presence of a feeding tube or central line at discharge. Improved awareness of these risk factors may help stratify patients in need of increased parental counseling and additional follow-up.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.