Residual networks (Resnets) have become a prominent architecture in deep learning. However, a comprehensive understanding of Resnets is still a topic of ongoing research. A recent view argues that Resnets perform iterative refinement of features. We attempt to further expose properties of this aspect. To this end, we study Resnets both analytically and empirically. We formalize the notion of iterative refinement in Resnets by showing that residual connections naturally encourage features of residual blocks to move along the negative gradient of loss as we go from one block to the next. In addition, our empirical analysis suggests that Resnets are able to perform both representation learning and iterative refinement. In general, a Resnet block tends to concentrate representation learning behavior in the first few layers while higher layers perform iterative refinement of features. Finally we observe that sharing residual layers naively leads to representation explosion and counterintuitively, overfitting, and we show that simple existing strategies can help alleviating this problem.

We show that the dynamics and convergence properties of SGD are set by the ratio of learning rate to batch size. We observe that this ratio is a key determinant of the generalization error, which we suggest is mediated by controlling the width of the final minima found by SGD. We verify our analysis experimentally on a range of deep neural networks and datasets.

It has been noted in existing literature that over-parameterization in ReLU networks generally improves performance. While there could be several factors involved behind this, we prove some desirable theoretical properties at initialization which may be enjoyed by ReLU networks. Specifically, it is known that He initialization in deep ReLU networks asymptotically preserves variance of activations in the forward pass and variance of gradients in the backward pass for infinitely wide networks, thus preserving the flow of information in both directions. Our paper goes beyond these results and shows novel properties that hold under He initialization: i) the norm of hidden activation of each layer is equal to the norm of the input, and, ii) the norm of weight gradient of each layer is equal to the product of norm of the input vector and the error at output layer. These results are derived using the PAC analysis framework, and hold true for finitely sized datasets such that the width of the ReLU network only needs to be larger than a certain finite lower bound. As we show, this lower bound depends on the depth of the network and the number of samples, and by the virtue of being a lower bound, over-parameterized ReLU networks are endowed with these desirable properties. For the aforementioned hidden activation norm property under He initialization, we further extend our theory and show that this property holds for a finite width network even when the number of data samples is infinite. Thus we overcome several limitations of existing papers, and show new properties of deep ReLU networks at initialization.

The early phase of training of deep neural networks is critical for their final performance. In this work, we study how the hyperparameters of stochastic gradient descent (SGD) used in the early phase of training affect the rest of the optimization trajectory. We argue for the existence of the "break-even" point on this trajectory, beyond which the curvature of the loss surface and noise in the gradient are implicitly regularized by SGD. In particular, we demonstrate on multiple classification tasks that using a large learning rate in the initial phase of training reduces the variance of the gradient, and improves the conditioning of the covariance of gradients. These effects are beneficial from the optimization perspective and become visible after the break-even point. Complementing prior work, we also show that using a low learning rate results in bad conditioning of the loss surface even for a neural network with batch normalization layers. In short, our work shows that key properties of the loss surface are strongly influenced by SGD in the early phase of training. We argue that studying the impact of the identified effects on generalization is a promising future direction. * Equal contribution. 1 We define it as K = 1 N N i=1 (gi − g) T (gi − g), where gi = g(x i , yi; θ) is the gradient of the training loss L with respect to θ on xi, N is the number of training examples, and g is the full-batch gradient.

No abstract

Traditionally, when generative models of data are developed via deep architectures, greedy layer-wise pre-training is employed. In a well-trained model, the lower layer of the architecture models the data distribution conditional upon the hidden variables, while the higher layers model the hidden distribution prior. But due to the greedy scheme of the layerwise training technique, the parameters of lower layers are fixed when training higher layers. This makes it extremely challenging for the model to learn the hidden distribution prior, which in turn leads to a suboptimal model for the data distribution. We therefore investigate joint training of deep autoencoders, where the architecture is viewed as one stack of two or more single-layer autoencoders. A single global reconstruction objective is jointly optimized, such that the objective for the single autoencoders at each layer acts as a local, layer-level regularizer. We empirically evaluate the performance of this joint training scheme and observe that it not only learns a better data model, but also learns better higher layer representations, which highlights its potential for unsupervised feature learning. In addition, we find that the usage of regularizations in the joint training scheme is crucial in achieving good performance. In the supervised setting, joint training also shows superior performance when training deeper models. The joint training framework can thus provide a platform for investigating more efficient usage of different types of regularizers, especially in light of the growing volumes of available unlabeled data.

No abstract

No abstract