The p53 protein appeared to be involved in both spermatogonial cell proliferation and radiation response. During normal spermatogenesis in the mouse, spermatogonia do not express p53, as analyzed by immunohistochemistry. However, after a dose of 4 Gy of X-rays, a distinct p53 staining was present in spermatogonia, suggesting that, in contrast to other reports, p53 does have a role in spermatogonia. To determine the possible role of p53 in spermatogonia, histological analysis was performed in testes of both p53 knock out C57BL/6 and FvB mice. The results indicate that p53 is an important factor in normal spermatogonial cell production as well as in the regulation of apoptosis after DNA damage. First, p53 knock out mouse testes contained about 50% higher numbers of A 1 spermatogonia, indicating that the production of differentiating type spermatogonia by the undifferentiated spermatogonia is enhanced in these mice. Second, 10 days after a dose of 5 Gy of X-rays, in the p53 knock out testes, increased numbers of giant sized spermatogonial stem cells were found, indicating disturbance of the apoptotic process in these cells. Third, in the p53 knock out testis, the differentiating A 2 -B spermatogonia are more radioresistant compared to their wild-type controls, indicating that p53 is partly indispensable in the removal of lethally irradiated differentiating type spermatogonia. In accordance with our immunohistochemical data, Western analysis showed that levels of p53 are increased in total adult testis lysates after irradiation. These data show that p53 is important in the regulation of cell production during normal spermatogenesis either by regulation of cell proliferation or, more likely, by regulating the apoptotic process in spermatogonia. Furthermore, after irradiation, p53 is important in the removal of lethally damaged spermatogonia.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the potential of pre-treatment cell kinetic parameters to predict outcome in head and neck cancer patients treated by conventional radiotherapy.Materials and methods: Data from 11 different centers were pooled. Inclusion criteria were such that the patients received radiotherapy alone, and that the radiotherapy was given in an overall time of at least 6 weeks with a dose of at least 60 Gy. All patients received a tracer dose of either iododeoxyuridine (IdUrd) or bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) intravenously prior to treatment and a tumor biopsy was taken several hours later. The cell kinetic parameters labeling index (LI), DNA synthesis time (Ts) and potential doubling time (Tpot) were subsequently calculated from¯ow cytometry data, obtained on the biopsies using antibodies against I/BrdUrd incorporated into DNA. Each center carried out their own¯ow cytometry analysis.Results: From the 11 centers, a total of 476 patients conforming to the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Median values for overall time and total dose were 49 days and 69 Gy, respectively. Fifty one percent of patients had local recurrences and 53% patients had died, the majority from their disease. Median follow-up was 20 months; being 30 months for surviving patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that T-stage, maximum tumor diameter, differentiation grade, N-stage, tumor localization and overall time correlated with locoregional control, in decreasing order of signi®cance. For the cell kinetic parameters, univariate analysis showed that only LI was signi®cantly associated with local control (P 0:02), with higher values correlating with a worse outcome. Ts showed some evidence that patients with longer values did worse, but this was not signi®cant (P 0:06). Tpot showed no trend (P 0:8). When assessing survival in a univariate analysis, neither LI nor Tpot associated with outcome (P 0:4, 0.4, respectively). Surprisingly, Ts did correlate with survival, with longer values being worse (P 0:02). In the multivariate analysis of local control, LI lost its signi®cance (P 0:16). Conclusions: The only pretreatment kinetic parameter for which some evidence was found for an association with local control (the best end-point for testing the present hypothesis) was LI, not Tpot, and this evidence disappeared in a multivariate analysis. It therefore appears that pretreatment cell kinetic measurements carried out using¯ow cytometry, only provide a relatively weak predictor of outcome after radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. q
p27kip1 is a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that regulates the G1/S transition of the cell cycle. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that during mouse testicular development p27kip1 is induced when the fetal germ cells, gonocytes, become quiescent on day 16 postcoitum, suggesting that p27kip1 is an important factor for the G1/G0 arrest in gonocytes. In the adult mouse and human testis, in general, spermatogonia are proliferating actively, except for undifferentiated spermatogonia that also go through a long G1/G0 arrest. However, none of the different types of germ cells immunohistochemically stained for p27kip1. During development, Sertoli cells are proliferating actively and only occasionally were lightly p27kip1 stained Sertoli cells observed. In contrast, in the adult testis the terminally differentiated Sertoli cells heavily stain for p27kip1. Twenty to 30% of both fetal and adult type Leydig cells lightly stained for p27kip1, possibly indicating the proportion of terminally differentiated cells in the Leydig cell population. In p27kip1 knockout mice, aberrations in the spermatogenic process were observed. First, an increase in the numbers ofA spermatogonia was found, and second, abnormal (pre)leptotene spermatocytes were observed, some of which seemingly tried to enter a mitotic division instead of entering the meiotic prophase. These observations indicate that p27kip1 has a role in the regulation of spermatogonial proliferation, or apoptosis, and the onset of the meiotic prophase in preleptotene spermatocytes. However, as p27kip1 is only expressed in Sertoli cells, the role of p27kip1 in both spermatogonia and preleptotene spermatocytes must be indirect. Hence, part of the supportive and/or regulatory role of Sertoli cells in the spermatogenic process depends on the expression of p27kip1 in these cells. Finally, we show that the expression of p27kip1 transiently increases by a factor of 3 after x-irradiation in whole testicular lysates. Hence, p27kip1 seems to be involved in the cellular response after DNA damage.
The aim of this work was to improve radiotherapy results by immune stimulation. We tested the effects of a combination of radio‐ and immunotherapy, i.e., local low dose recombinant interleukin‐2 (rIL‐2) treatment, in two murine tumor models. Syngeneic tumors (SL2 lymphoma or M8013 mammary carcinoma) were induced subcutaneously on one or both flanks of mice. Irradiation was given either as a single dose (20 Gy) or fractionated (25 Gy) in 2 weeks. One or two cycles of rIL‐2 were given concurrent with or subsequent to radiotherapy. One cycle of rIL‐2 consisted of peritumoral injections administered on 5 consecutive days. Treatment effects were measured in terms of local tumor response and disease‐free survival (DFS). The combined treatment modality was significantly better than treatment with either irradiation alone or rIL‐2 alone. When tumors were inoculated on both flanks of the mice, combined radioimmunotherapy of one of the tumors also resulted in regression of the contralateral untreated tumor, indicating that a systemic anti‐tumor immune reaction was induced. Additional rIL‐2 injections did not enhance radiation toxicity. In conclusion supplementing irradiation with locally administered low doses of rIL‐2 results in better local anti‐tumor responses and DFS rates than either treatment alone without enhanced treatment toxicity. Furthermore, the local treatment induces a systemic anti‐tumor reaction, influencing the growth patterns of a second, untreated tumor. Radiat. Oncol. Invest. 5:54–61, 1997. © 1997 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.