This report identifies the changing trends in clinical practice in the treatment of geriatric femoral neck fractures in the U.S. Treating physicians should be aware of these trends, which include a decreasing national incidence of geriatric femoral neck fractures as well as an increase in the use of THA.

Spinal surgery for prostate metastases improves neurological function and decreases analgesic requirements. Our findings support surgical intervention for carefully selected patients, and knowledge of preoperative hormone sensitivity and performance status may help with risk stratification.

In 2007, members of our group reported a 21 month median survival for patients undergoing surgery for metastatic breast cancer in the spinal column. Cervical spine metastases were associated with decreased survival, Estrogen receptor positivity was associated with improved survival, and age and visceral metastases did not significantly impact survival. In the current study, we reassess these variables in the context of modern adjuvant therapies, and investigate the impact of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS). We report an observational cohort of 43 patients undergoing surgical resection for metastatic breast cancer of the spine treated at a single academic institution from June 2002 to August 2011. Patient medical records were reviewed in accordance with policies outlined by the University Institutional Review Board. Median overall survival following surgery for metastatic breast cancer in the spine was 26.8 months. 1 year overall survival was 66%. 5 year-overall survival was 4%. Age (p=0.12), preoperative functional status (p=0.17), location of metastasis (p=0.34), the presence of visceral metastases (p=0.68), and spinal instability (p=0.81) were not significant variables on survival analysis. Postoperative adjuvant therapy with a single modality (radiation or chemotherapy) was associated with a significantly lower median survival compared to dual therapy with chemotherapy and radiation (p=0.042). Patients that received radiation and chemotherapy after surgery were younger but demonstrated prolonged median survival versus single modality therapy. This data supports the concept that visceral metastases do not impact survival, however cervical spine lesions were not associated with decreased survival.

Introduction: Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is often associated with low back pain and radiating leg pain. The purpose of this study is to develop a reproducible and standardized preclinical model of painful lumbar IVD degeneration by evaluation of structural and behavioral changes in response to IVD injury with increasing needle sizes. This model can be used to develop new therapies for IVD degeneration.Methods: Forty-five female Sprague Dawley rats underwent anterior lumbar disc needle puncture at levels L4-5 and L5-6 under fluoroscopic guidance. Animals were randomly assigned to four different experimental groups: needle sizes of 18 Gauge (G), 21G, 23G, and sham control. To monitor the progression of IVD degeneration and pain, the following methods were employed: μMRI, qRT-PCR, histology, and biobehavioral analysis.Results: T1-and T2-weighted μMRI analysis showed a correlation between the degree of IVD degeneration and needle diameter, with the most severe degeneration in the 18G group. mRNA expression of markers for IVD degeneration markers were dysregulated in the 18G and 21G groups, while pro-nociceptive markers were increased in the 18G group only. Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) and Alcian Blue/ Picrosirius Red staining confirmed the most pronounced IVD degeneration in the 18G group. Randall-Selitto and von Frey tests showed increased hindpaw sensitivity in the 18G group. Conclusion:Our findings demonstrate that anterior disc injury with an 18G needle creates severe IVD degeneration and mechanical hypersensitivity, while the 21G needle results in moderate degeneration with no increased pain sensitivity. Therefore, needle sizes should be selected depending on the desired phenotype for the pre-clinical model.

Introduction Surgical treatment and cement augmentation procedures are effective palliative techniques for the treatment of symptomatic spinal metastases. However, clinical results specific to a breast cancer cohort are generally lacking. We aim to systematically review the literature for clinical outcomes following operative interventions and prognostic factors for the treatment of breast metastases to the spine. Specifically, we describe the survival and clinical outcomes of surgery and cement augmentation procedures for breast metastases to the spine and to determine prognostic variables that may help recognize which patients will perform better or worse following surgery. Methods We performed a literature review using PubMed to identify articles that reported outcomes and/or prognostic factors of the breast cancer patient population with spinal metastases treated with any surgical technique since 1990. Results A total of 19 surgical studies, 4 cement augmentation studies, and 6 nonsurgical prognostic variable studies met the preset inclusion criteria. All but three studies (two surgical and one cement augmentation) were retrospective in nature, and all studies were of level of evidence IV. Median postoperative survival for metastatic breast cancer was 21.7 months (8.2–36 months), mean rate of pain improvement was 92.9% (76–100%), mean rate of neurological improvement was 63.8% (53–100%), mean rate neurological decline was 4.1% (0–8%), and mean rate LTC was 92.6% (89–100%). Kyphoplasty studies reported a high rate of pain control in selected patients. Negative prognostic variables included: hormonal (estrogen and progesterone) and HER2 receptor refractory tumor status, high degree of axillary lymph node involvement, and short disease-free interval (DFI). All other clinical or prognostic parameters were of low or insufficient strength. Conclusion With respect to clinical outcomes, studies consistently found that surgery resulted in neurological improvement for a majority of patients, with a minimal risk of worsening, and kyphoplasty studies reported a high rate of pain control. Increased postoperative survival 2002 onwards was likely due to FDA approval of new chemotherapies. However, specific factors associated with shorter survival following surgery involve hormone and HER2 receptor status and disease-free interval.

Study Design: Review article. Objective: A review of the literature on current strategies utilized in intervertebral regeneration and repair efforts. Methods: A review of the literature and analysis of the data to provide an updated review on current concepts of intervertebral disc repair and regeneration efforts. Results: Multiple regenerative strategies for intervertebral disc regeneration are being employed to reduce pain and improve quality of life. Current promising strategies include molecular therapy, gene therapy, cell-based therapy, and augmentation with biomaterials. Multiple clinical trials studying biologic, cell-based, and scaffold-based injectable therapies are currently being investigated. Conclusion: Low back pain due to intervertebral disc disease represents a significant health and societal burden. Current promising strategies include molecular therapy, gene therapy, cell-based therapy, and augmentation with biomaterials. To date, there are no Food and Drug Administration–approved intradiscal therapies for discogenic back pain, and there are no large randomized trials that have shown clinically significant improvement with any investigational regenerative treatment. Multiple clinical trials studying biologic, cell-based, or scaffold-based injectable therapies are being currently investigated.

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy and the second leading cause of death in Western women. Breast cancer most commonly metastasizes to the bone and has a particular affinity with the spine, accounting for 2/3 of osseous metastases discovered. With significant improvements in cancer therapies, the number of patients at risk for symptomatic spinal metastases is likely to increase. Patients may suffer from intractable pain and neurological dysfunction, negatively influencing their quality of life. Timely diagnosis of patients is crucial and has been aided by several breakthrough advances in imaging techniques which aid in detection, staging, and follow-up of bone metastases. Breast metastases are usually responsive to hormonal therapy and pharmacologic interventions, but skeletal metastases often require surgical intervention. The treatments are palliative but goals include the preserving or restoring neurologic function, ensuring spinal stability, and relieving pain. Advances in surgical techniques and instrumentation have allowed more effective decompression and stabilization of the spine, and with the support of recent evidence the trend has shifted towards using more advanced surgical options in appropriately selected patients. In this review, the clinical presentation, diagnosis, patient selection, and surgical management of breast cancer metastatic to the spine are discussed. Key words: Breast cancer; Spine; Metastasis; Surgery; Outcomes; Decompression Core tip: Breast cancer most commonly metastasizes to the bone and has a particular affinity for the spine. The treatment for symptomatic spinal metastases remains palliative and is not intended to prolong survival. Surgical advances in the last few decades have allowed improved spinal cord decompression and tumor resection. With the support of recent literature, the trend has shifted towards using more advanced surgical options in appropriately selected patients. Goals of treatment include restoration of and preservation of neurological function, maintaining spinal stability, and pain relief in an effort to achieve a better quality of life.Ju DG, Yurter A, Gokaslan ZL, Sciubba DM. Diagnosis and surgical management of breast cancer metastatic to the spine. World

Study Design: Post hoc comparison using single-site data from 4 multicenter randomized controlled trials. Objectives: Discogenic back pain is associated with significant morbidity and medical cost. Several terminated, unreported randomized controlled trials have studied the effect of intradiscal biologic injections. Here we report single-center outcomes from these trials to determine if there is clinical improvement associated with these intradiscal injections. Methods: Post hoc comparison was performed using single-site data from 4 similar multi-center randomized controlled trials. All trials evaluated an injectable therapy (growth factor, fibrin sealant, or stem cells) for symptomatic lumbar disc disease with near-identical inclusion and exclusion criteria. Demographics and patient reported outcomes were analyzed across treatment arms postinjection. Results: A total of 38 patients were treated with biologic agents and 12 were treated with control saline injections. There was a significant decrease in visual analogue score (VAS) pain for both the investigational and saline groups up to 12 months postinjection ( P < .01). There was no significant difference in VAS scores between the saline and investigational groups at 12 months. Similarly, there was significant improvement in patient-reported disability scores in both the investigational and saline groups at all time points. There were no significant differences in disability score improvement between the saline and investigational treatment groups at 12 months postinjection. Conclusions: A single-center analysis of 4 randomized controlled studies demonstrated no difference in outcomes between therapeutic intradiscal agents (growth factor, fibrin sealant, or stem cells) and control saline groups. In all groups, patient reported pain and disability scores decreased significantly. Future studies are needed to evaluate the therapeutic benefit of any intradiscal injections.