Objective The purpose of this study was to examine the severity and quality of ocular pain complaints in patients with dry eye symptoms. Methods Subjects with clinically-relevant dry eye symptoms (dryness, discomfort, tearing) of unknown origin seen in the Miami Veterans Affairs eye clinic were administered questionnaires for dry eye symptoms and ocular pain and underwent a standardized ocular examination. Qualities and severity ratings of ocular pain in subjects with idiopathic dry eye were compared to similar measures from published data in other chronic pain populations. Results The study sample consisted of 154 subjects, of which 91% were male and ranged in age from 27 to 89 (mean age = 61). Fifty-three percent of participants reported an average ocular pain of at least moderate intensity (numerical rating scale (NRS) ≥ 4), with specific characteristics (i.e., “burning” spontaneous pain) reported at frequencies comparable to prevalent chronic neuropathic pain syndromes as reported in the literature. Significant correlations were found between ocular pain metrics and dry eye symptom severity scores (r=0.57 to 0.66). Dry eye signs, however, did not generally correlate with ocular pain severity. Conclusions A significant proportion of subjects with idiopathic dry eye symptoms reported moderate or greater ocular pain intensity, with the majority endorsing descriptors commonly used by patients with non-ocular neuropathic pain conditions. Identifying sub-groups of dry eye patients based on the presence and characteristics of ocular pain complaints may improve dry eye sub classification and better individualize treatment strategies.
Recent data demonstrate that dry eye (DE) susceptibility and other chronic pain syndromes (CPS) such as chronic widespread pain, irritable bowel syndrome and pelvic pain, may share common heritable factors. Previously, we showed that DE patients describing more severe symptoms tended to report features of neuropathic ocular pain (NOP). We hypothesize that patients with a greater number of CPS would have a different DE phenotype compared to those with fewer CPS. We recruited a cohort of 154 DE patients from the Miami Veterans Affairs Hospital and defined high and low CPS groups by cluster analysis. In addition to worse non-ocular pain complaints and higher PTSD and depression scores (P<0.01), we found that the high CPS group reported more severe neuropathic-type DE symptoms compared to the low CPS group, including worse ocular pain assessed via 3 different pain scales (P<0.05), with similar objective corneal DE signs. This is the first study to demonstrate DE patients who manifest a greater number of comorbid CPS report more severe DE symptoms and features of NOP. These findings provide further evidence that NOP may represent a central pain disorder, and that shared mechanistic factors may underlie vulnerability to some forms of DE and other comorbid CPS.
IMPORTANCE Somatosensory dysfunction likely underlies dry eye (DE) symptoms in many individuals yet remains an understudied component of the disease. Its presence has important diagnostic and therapeutic implications. OBJECTIVE To assess the integrity of nociceptive system processes in persons with DE and ocular pain using quantitative sensory testing (QST) techniques applied at a site remote from the eye. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A cross-sectional study conducted at Miami Veterans Affairs Hospital included 118 individuals with a wide variety of DE symptoms and signs. The study was conducted from October 31, 2013, to January 28, 2016. INTERVENTIONS Individuals completed questionnaires regarding ocular symptoms (5-Item Dry Eye Questionnaire [DEQ5], Ocular Surface Disease Index [OSDI], and Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory modified for the eye [NPSI-E]), psychological status, and medication use and underwent an ocular surface examination. The QST metrics included measures of vibratory and thermal thresholds and cold and hot pain temporal summation (surrogate measures of central sensitization) on the forearm. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Correlations among DE and ocular pain symptom severity with QST metrics measured on the forearm. The OSDI score ranges from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating the most severe DE symptoms. The DEQ5 score ranges from 0 to 22, with the highest score indicating the most severe symptoms, and the NPSI-E score ranges from 0 to 100, with the highest score indicating the most severe symptoms. Psychological state was measured with the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire, the PTSD Checklist-Military Version for PTSD, and the Symptom Checklist-90 for anxiety. RESULTS Of the 118 patients who participated in the study, 105 (88.9%) were men (mean [SD] age, 60 [10] years), and a mean of 41% had PTSD, 10% depression, and 0.93% anxiety. Using stepwise linear regression analyses, significant associations were identified between overall DE symptom severity and posttraumatic stress disorder scores and tear breakup time (DEQ5 model: R = 0.54; OSDI model: R = 0.61, P < .001). All other variables (ie, demographics, comorbidities, medications, tear film factors, and QST metrics) dropped out of these models. When specifically considering neuropathic-like qualities of DE pain, however, anxiety and hot pain temporal summation at the forearm explained 17% of the variability in ocular burning (R = 0.41; P < .001), and PTSD score, tear breakup time, and hot pain temporal summation at the forearm explained 25% of the variability in sensitivity to wind (R = 0.50; P < .001) and 30% of the variability in total NPSI-E scores (R = 0.55; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Our findings demonstrate that neuropathic-like DE pain symptom severity correlates with quantitative measures of pain sensitivity at a site remote from the eye. This result provides additional evidence that DE symptoms are not only manifestations of a local disorder but also involve somatosensory dysfunction beyond the trigeminal system.
Angiocentric glioma, a rare brain neoplasm with features of ependymal differentiation, has only recently been recognized as a distinct clinicopathological entity. To date, all reported cases have involved tumors in the cerebral hemispheres, and the majority have presented with seizures. The authors report the case of a 5-year-old girl who presented with several cranial neuropathies and mild gait disturbance. An exophytic neoplasm arising from the posterior midbrain and causing obstructive hydrocephalus was identified, and surgical resection revealed a neoplasm with features of angiocentric glioma.
Introduction: Persistent (patent) foramen ovale (PFO) is a recognized risk for decompression sickness (DCS) in divers, which may be mitigated by conservative diving or by PFO closure. Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of these two risk mitigation interventions. Methods: This was a prospective study on divers who tested positive for PFO or an atrial septal defect (ASD) and either decided to continue diving without closure ('conservative group'), or to close their PFO/ASD and continue diving ('closure group'). Divers' characteristics, medical history, history of diving and history of DCS were reported at enrollment and annually after that. The outcome measures were the incidence rate of DCS, frequency and intensity of diving activities, and adverse events of closure. Results: Divers in both groups dived less and had a lower incidence rate of confirmed DCS than before the intervention. In the closure group (n = 42) the incidence rate of confirmed DCS decreased significantly. Divers with a large PFO experienced the greatest reduction in total DCS. In the conservative group (n = 23), the post-intervention decrease in confirmed DCS incidence rate was not significant. Of note, not all divers returned to diving after closure. Seven subjects reported mild adverse events associated with closure; one subject reported a serious adverse event. Conclusions: PFO closure should be considered on an individual basis. In particular, individuals who are healthy, have a significant DCS burden, a large PFO or seek to pursue advanced diving may benefit from closure.
Objective: This study quantifies the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) secondary to wearing neck seals in scuba diving drysuits. Previous work demonstrates significant pressures exerted by these seals; we hypothesize that they would reduce craniofacial venous drainage and increase IOP through elevation of episcleral venous pressure. Methods: IOP was measured in 33 divers before and while wearing a drysuit using rebound tonometry. The drysuit neck seal pressures were measured using a manometer. A paired two-sample t-test was used to compare IOP before and after drysuit donning. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between neck sealing pressures and IOP by side. Results: The mean IOP in the right eye was similar pre- and post-drysuit donning, with baseline mean 15.9 mmHg (3.7 mmhg) versus 15.4 mmHg (4.3 mmHg), p=0.4074. Similarly, the mean IOP in the left eye was also similar, with mean pre-donning IOP 15.6 (3.8 mmHg) versus 15.4 mmHg (4.7 mmHg) post-donning, p=0.7467. The mean right and left neck seal pressures were 23.66 (10.60) mmHg and 23.67 (7.87) mmHg, respectively. Only correlation between right neck sealing pressure for silicone neck seals and right IOP, pre- and post-donning was significant (pre: 0.97, p-value 0.0284, post: 0.98, p-value 0.0187). Conclusion: No significant difference overall was detected in IOP with drysuit donning.
W e read the recent article penned by Komorowski et al. 1 with great interest, and we congratulate the authors on a well-composed and thought-provoking article addressing space exploration and the challenges of medical care, especially anesthesia, in this austere environment.Although undersea and hyperbaric medicine is often associated with treating conditions secondary to increases in ambient pressure, such as those arising from scuba diving, it also aids in understanding and treating the pathophysiology 4. Wu X, Jiang Z, Ying J, Han Y, Chen Z: Optimal blood pressure decreases acute kidney injury after gastrointestinal surgery in elderly hypertensive patients: A randomized study: Optimal blood pressure reduces acute kidney injury.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.