Summary We recently used sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in Indiana limestone coreflood experiments to lower anionic-surfactant adsorption. This study presents analysis of the limestone geochemistry and the surfactant adsorption under static and dynamic conditions. Analysis of the effluent ionic composition using ion chromatography and inductively coupled plasma showed the presence of sulfate (SO42−) aluminum (Al), and iron (Fe), as well as calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg). To determine the likely source of each geochemical species and to characterize how the dissolution kinetics changes the slug chemistry, PHREEQC was used to inverse-model Indiana limestone rock using the bulk X-ray-diffraction (XRD) mineralogical composition and the influent and effluent water chemistry. Results showed that all Indiana limestone cores contained anhydrite, which was not detected by XRD. The effluent concentration of Al increased with pH to approximately 15 mg/L, whereas Fe concentration remained fairly independent of pH at 0.04 ± 0.02 mg/L. These trends suggest the likely source of Al and Fe to be either clay dissolution or the release of natural clay colloids with NaOH. Simulations suggested that in Fe-bearing carbonates, alkali consumption is fast but limited with NaOH, which is observed as pH-front delay, whereas alkali consumption is slow but severe with sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) resulting in minimal pH-front delay but lower effluent pH compared with influent pH for prolonged injection times. Using the PHREEQC calculations, the ionic composition of the chemical slug in subsequent alkali/surfactant/polymer (ASP) experiments was adjusted. In addition, the coupled adsorption/transport of anionic surfactants in carbonate rocks was also investigated using surface-complexation-model adsorption under static and dynamic conditions. Model predictions agree with the single-phase-adsorption coreflood results and suggest that the adsorption on the metal oxides or clay could be comparable with that on calcite. This arises from the higher surface area and the point of zero charge of pH (pHpzc) of metal oxides.
Summary Geochemical modeling was used to design and conduct a series of alkaline/surfactant/polymer (ASP) coreflood experiments to measure the surfactant retention in limestone cores using sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as the alkali. Surfactant/polymer (SP) coreflood experiments were conducted under the same conditions for comparison. NaOH has been used for ASP floods of sandstones, but these are the first experiments to test it for ASP floods of limestones. Two studies performed under different reservoir conditions showed that NaOH significantly reduced the surfactant retention in Indiana Limestone. An ASP solution with 0.3 wt% NaOH has a pH of approximately 12.6 at 25°C. The high pH increases the negative surface charge of the carbonate, which favors lower adsorption of anionic surfactants. Another advantage of NaOH is that low concentrations of only approximately 0.3 wt% can be used because of its low molecular weight and its low consumption in limestones. Most reservoir carbonates contain gypsum or anhydrite, and therefore sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) will be consumed by the precipitation of calcium carbonate (CaCO3). As shown in the two studies, NaOH can be used in limestone reservoirs containing gypsum or anhydrite.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.