Background Operation notes often have omissions and are difficult to locate in patients notes despite clear guidance from the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) 'Good Surgical Practice' 2014 outlining what should be included in operation notes. Procedure-specific proformas are rarely used by Plastic surgeons despite being utilised by other specialities. With an alarming rise of incidence of skin malignancies there has been an increase in the number of skin lesions referred to Plastic surgeons for excision. The need for reliable, reproducible, accurate and easily accessible operating notes for skin lesion excision is pivotal for continuity of care and treatment planning. This study aimed at comparing the quality of skin lesion operation notes prior-to and after implementation of a procedure-specific proforma in relation to RCS recommendations. Methods Fourteen parameters from the recommendations by the RCS ‘Good Surgical Practice’ 2014 guidelines were used to audit skin lesion operation notes. The study consisted of a retrospective audit of 80 operation notes and a prospective audit of 80 operation notes following the development and implementation of a skin lesion procedure-specific proforma. We assessed and compared the operation notes overall compliance with the RCS guidelines. Statistical analysis highlighting the difference between both groups was performed using the independent sample t -test. Results After implementation of the skin lesion procedure-specific proforma, the average compliance with the RCS recommendations increased significantly from 87.5% retrospectively to 98.8% prospectively ( p -value 0.0414). In 6 of the 14 parameters assessed significant improvements with regards compliance to the guidelines was demonstrated. Conclusion The development and implementation of a skin lesion procedure-specific proforma has demonstrated a significant improvement in the quality of operation notes within a Plastic surgery department which has the potential to minimise omissions and improve continuity of surgical patient care.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Objective: To evaluate the various temporary transvenous pacemaker (TPM) access sites, its indications, procedural complications, and outcomes of patients. Methods: This prospective study conducted in a tertiary care hospital of Peshawar, included 100 patients, who underwent TPM for any reasons, via the trans jugular, subclavian, or trans-femoral route. The duration of the study was from October 1st, 2021 to March 31st, 2022. The demographic, procedure -related complications, causes of complete heart block and in hospital outcomes were recorded. Results: Of the 100 patients who underwent temporary transvenous pacing, 56%were males and 44% were females, with an age range of 46-80 years. In majority of the patients, (N =54) internal jugular vein was used as the venous access site followed by the subclavian vein. (N=24). Coronary artery disease was prevalent in 42% of the patients. 50% had complete AV block, 19% had symptomatic second-degree block, and 10% had sinus nodal diseases. Seventy three percent of the patients needed TPM implantation on an emergency basis, which is statistically significant (p=0.009). Almost 40% of the patient ultimately underwent a permanent pacemaker. Out of 100 patients, 16 patients expired. The major procedure related complications were bleeding 16% overall at the puncture site and 14.8% in the internal jugular group. Other complications were local infection 13% at the insertion site followed by hemopericardium 3%, in the internal jugular group. Conclusion: Atrioventricular block is the commonest indication for temporary pacing in our study. The average time the TPM remained in place was significantly higher in the trans jugular approach group along with a higher complication rate in this group. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.4.7467 How to cite this: Adil M, Khan SB, Khan MS, Hassan Z. Rate of various access sites for temporary transvenous pacing and different outcomes at Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci. 2023;39(4):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.4.7467 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.