Objective. To compare the frequency of joint and tendon disease on ultrasound (US) and clinical examination, and to investigate agreement between US and clinical evaluation in ankles with clinically active juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).Methods. US and clinical evaluation were performed independently in the joint and tendon compartments of 105 ankles. Gray-scale (GS) US and power Doppler (PD) US joint abnormalities were scored on a 4-point semiquantitative scale. A joint with a GS score ≥2 and/or a PD score ≥1 was defined as active on US. Agreement was tested using kappa statistics.Results. A total of 163 joints in 89 ankles had active synovitis on US. The tibiotalar (TT) joint was the most commonly affected joint on US and on clinical evaluation. The intertarsal (IT) joint and the subtalar (ST) joint were the second in frequency on US and on clinical evaluation, respectively. Tenosynovitis was found more commonly on US than on clinical evaluation (70.5% and 32.4%, respectively), and was more frequent in the medial and lateral than in the anterior tendon compartment. Isolated tenosynovitis was detected on US in 12 of 105 ankles. Agreement between US and clinical evaluation for detection of active synovitis and tenosynovitis was less than acceptable (κ <0.4). No correlation was found between any feature of active disease recorded on clinical evaluation (joint swelling, tenderness/pain on motion, and restricted motion) and active synovitis on US in the TT joint, ST joint, and IT joint. Conclusion.Coupling clinical evaluation with US aids in correctly localizing pathology. US training of practitioners is recommended to manage ankle disease in JIA.

Background: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel intraperitoneal drug delivery method of low-dose chemotherapy as a pressurized aerosol in patients affected by peritoneal cancer of primary or secondary origin. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with the aim of assessing the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of PIPAC. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using Medline and Web of Science databases from 1 January 2011, to inception, to 31 December 2021. Data were independently extracted by two authors. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality and risk of bias of studies. Meta-analysis was performed for pathological response, radiological response, PCI variation along treatment, and for patients undergoing three or more PIPAC. Pooled analyses were performed using the Freeman–Tukey double arcsine transformation, and 95% CIs were calculated using Clopper–Pearson exact CIs in all instances. Results: A total of 414 papers on PIPAC were identified, and 53 studies considering 4719 PIPAC procedure in 1990 patients were included for analysis. The non-access rate or inability to perform PIPAC pooled rate was 4% of the procedures performed. The overall proportion of patients who completed 3 or more cycles of PIPAC was 39%. Severe toxicities considering CTCAE 3–4 were 4% (0% to 38.5%). In total, 50 studies evaluated deaths within the first 30 postoperative days. In the included 1936 patients were registered 26 deaths (1.3%). The pooled analysis of all the studies reporting a pathological response was 68% (95% CI 0.61–0.73), with an acceptable heterogeneity (I2 28.41%, p = 0.09). In total, 10 papers reported data regarding the radiological response, with high heterogeneity and a weighted means of 15% (0% to 77.8%). PCI variation along PIPAC cycles were reported in 14 studies. PCI diminished, increased, or remained stable in eight, one and five studies, respectively, with high heterogeneity at pooled analysis. Regarding survival, there was high heterogeneity. The 12-month estimated survival from first PIPAC for colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, gynecological cancer and hepatobiliary/pancreatic cancer were, respectively, 53%, 25%, 59% and 37%. Conclusions: PIPAC may be a useful treatment option for selected patients with PM, with acceptable grade 3 and 4 toxicity and promising survival benefit. Meta-analysis showed high heterogeneity of data among up-to-date available studies. In a subset analysis per primary tumor origin, pathological tumor regression was documented in 68% of the studies with acceptable heterogeneity. Pathological regression seems, therefore, a reliable outcome for PIPAC activity and a potential surrogate endpoint of treatment response. We recommend uniform selection criteria for patients entering a PIPAC program and highlight the urgent need to standardize items for PIPAC reports and datasets.

No abstract

Objective To evaluate in real-life the effectiveness and safety of canakinumab in Italian patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA). Methods A retrospective multicentre study of children with sJIA was performed. Clinical features, laboratory parameters and adverse events were collected at baseline, after 6 and 12 months from starting canakinumab. The effectiveness primary outcome was clinical inactive disease (CID) off glucocorticoids (GCs) treatment at 6 months. Results A total of 80 children were analyzed from 15 Italian centers. Of the 12 patients who started canakinumab in CID while receiving anakinra, all maintained CID. Of the 68 with active disease at baseline, 57.4% achieved CID off GCs at 6 months and 63.8% at 12 months. In univariate analysis, the variables significantly related with non-response were number of active joints (NAJ) ≥5, history of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) and disease duration. Multivariate analysis confirmed the association with non-response of NAJ ≥5 (OR 6.37 (95%CI 1.69–24.02), p= 0.006) and history of MAS (OR 3.53 (95%CI 1.06–11.70), p= 0.039). No serious adverse events were recorded in this series. There were two cases of MAS during canakinumab, leading to a rate of 2.9 episodes per 100 patient year. Conclusion We confirm, in real-life, the efficacy of canakinumab in sJIA in a multicentric cohort. History of MAS and higher NAJ were associated with lower probability of achieving clinical inactive disease.