The effective treatment of infected wounds continues to be a serious challenge, mainly due to the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) refers to the topical or systemic administration of a non-toxic, photosensitizing agent (PS), followed by irradiation with visible light of a suitable wavelength. The possibility of applying the PDT locally is what makes it so favorable to the treatment of infected wounds. The goal of this study was to evaluate the action of the PDT in the inactivation in vitro of microorganisms coming from infected wounds, using methylene blue (MB) and photodithazine (PDZ) as the PS and comparing the efficacy of these two compounds for PDT on bacteria. For the application of PDT, isolated microorganisms identified from material collected from wounds were suspended in a saline solution containing 10(6) viable cells/ml. Each isolated microorganism was submitted to PDT with MB and with PDZ in accordance with the following treatment groups: N/T--no treatment; T1--PDT with PDZ; T2--PDT with MB; T3--irradiation without PS; T4--treatment with PDZ without light; and T5--treatment with MB without light. As a light source, an LED-based device was used (Biopdi/Irrad-Lead 660), composed of 54 LEDs, each with 70 mW of power in the 660 nm region of the electromagnetic spectrum. Each tray of 96 wells was irradiated with an intensity of 25 mW/cm(2) and a dose of light of 50 J/cm(3) for 33 min. All the tests were made in duplicate. It was then concluded that the PDT with PDZ was capable of inhibiting the growth of gram-positive bacteria samples, however it did not have the same effect on gram-negative bacteria, which showed growth greater than 100,000 CFU; the PDT with MB showed an effectiveness on gram-positive as well as gram-negative bacteria, for it was able to inhibit bacterial growth in both cases.
Objetivo: Verificar juntamente aos Estabelecimentos Assistenciais de Saúde do Vale do Paraíba Paulista a utilização do cateter PICC, de que forma, desde quando o fazem e os profissionais envolvidos no processo. Métodos: Observacional, descritivo com abordagem quantitativa. Elaborou-se um questionário para coleta de dados e realizou-se pré-teste com três voluntários. A amostra constituiu-se de 10 instituições de saúde. Resultados: O Cateter PICC é utilizado por 70% da amostra que apresentou: uso de protocolos para todo o processo, investimento em treinamento para a equipe, controle de complicações, utilização do profissional enfermeiro para a inserção e remoção do dispositivo e ampla utilização em suas UTIs. A minoria utiliza a punção guiada por imagem para inserção do dispositivo. Conclusão: O PICC é amplamente utilizado desde o ano de 2005. A competência do enfermeiro habilitado é reconhecida, sendo este profissional o responsável pela atuação frente a este dispositivo. Descritores: Cateteres de Demora, Cateterismo Periférico, Enfermagem.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.