One way to improve speech understanding in noise for HI with a unilateral hearing loss is by contralateral routing of signals (CROS). Such a CROS-system captures sounds with an additional microphone at the worst hearing ear and transmits these to the better one. The better ear is then provided with a mix of signals originating from both ears. The goal of this study is to quantify the effect of a CROS-system on speech reception thresholds (SRTs) with unilaterally implanted CI-users in diffuse and directional noise as a function of speaker location. Listening tests are performed and an accurate directional intelligibly model is proposed used for further analysis. In diffuse noise it is concluded that the use of a CROS system results in a maximum gain in SRT of 7.9 dB when speech comes from the CROS side compared to a maximum loss in SRT of 2.1 dB when speech comes from the implanted side. In the case of directional noise, the effect of the CROS is symmetric and the maximum loss or gain in SRT was around 9 dB. The study therefore shows a clear potential of using the CROS system in diffuse noise.

Objectives: To define fitting ranges for nine bone conduction devices (BCDs) over different frequencies based on the device's maximum power output (MPO) and to validate the assessment of MPO of BCDs in the ear canal.Background: Maximum power output (MPO) is an important characteristic when fit-

Orienting responses to audiovisual events have shorter reaction times and better accuracy and precision when images and sounds in the environment are aligned in space and time. How the brain constructs an integrated audiovisual percept is a computational puzzle because the auditory and visual senses are represented in different reference frames: the retina encodes visual locations with respect to the eyes; whereas the sound localisation cues are referenced to the head. In the well-known ventriloquist effect, the auditory spatial percept of the ventriloquist's voice is attracted toward the synchronous visual image of the dummy, but does this visual bias on sound localisation operate in a common reference frame by correctly taking into account eye and head position? Here we studied this question by independently varying initial eye and head orientations, and the amount of audiovisual spatial mismatch. Human subjects pointed head and/or gaze to auditory targets in elevation, and were instructed to ignore co-occurring visual distracters. Results demonstrate that different initial head and eye orientations are accurately and appropriately incorporated into an audiovisual response. Effectively, sounds and images are perceptually fused according to their physical locations in space independent of an observer's point of view. Implications for neurophysiological findings and modelling efforts that aim to reconcile sensory and motor signals for goal-directed behaviour are discussed.

When a sound is presented in the free field at a location that remains fixed to the head during whole-body rotation in darkness, it is heard displaced in the direction opposing the rotation. This phenomenon is known as the audiogyral illusion. Consequently, the subjective auditory median plane (AMP) (the plane where the binaural difference cues for sound localization are perceived to be zero) shifts in the direction of body rotation. Recent experiments, however, have suggested opposite AMP results when using a fixation light that also moves with the head. Although in this condition the eyes remain stationary in the head, an ocular pursuit signal cancels the vestibulo-ocular reflex, which could induce an additional AMP shift. We tested whether the AMP is influenced by vestibular signals, eye position or eye velocity. We rotated subjects sinusoidally at different velocities, either in darkness or with a head-fixed fixation light, while they judged the laterality (left vs. right with respect to the midsagittal plane of the head) of broadband sounds presented over headphones. Subjects also performed the same task without vestibular stimulation while tracking a sinusoidally moving visual target, which mimicked the average eye-movement patterns of the vestibular experiments in darkness. Results show that whole-body rotation in darkness induces a shift of the AMP in the direction of body rotation. In contrast, we obtained no significant AMP change when a fixation light was used. The pursuit experiments showed a shift of the AMP in the direction of eccentric eye position but not at peak pursuit velocity. We therefore conclude that the vestibular-induced shift in average eye position underlies both the audiogyral illusion and the AMP shift.