CDK1 is a nonredundant cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) with an essential role in mitosis, but its multiple functions still are poorly understood at a molecular level. Here we identify a selective small-molecule inhibitor of CDK1 that reversibly arrests human cells at the G 2͞M border of the cell cycle and allows for effective cell synchronization in early mitosis. Inhibition of CDK1 during cell division revealed that its activity is necessary and sufficient for maintaining the mitotic state of the cells, preventing replication origin licensing and premature cytokinesis. Although CDK1 inhibition for up to 24 h is well tolerated, longer exposure to the inhibitor induces apoptosis in tumor cells, suggesting that selective CDK1 inhibitors may have utility in cancer therapy.apoptosis ͉ cancer therapy ͉ cell cycle ͉ cytokinesis ͉ replication origin T he cell cycle is a precisely controlled set of biochemical and morphological events driven by the sequential activation of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) (1). Three CDKs and their activating cyclins (A, B, D, and E) play key roles in mammalian cell cycle regulation (2). It has been established that CDK4͞ cyclin D and CDK2͞cyclin E͞A promote the passage through G 1 and S phases, whereas CDK1͞cyclin B regulates the transition through late G 2 and mitosis (3). However, recent genetic and RNA interference studies in mammalian cells have revealed that CDK2 and CDK4 are not essential for cell cycle progression, thus leaving CDK1 as the only nonredundant cell cycle driver (4-6). Genetic studies in yeast and mammalian cells have established the critical role of CDK1 in mitosis, but the long list of its putative substrate proteins still is growing, and its precise functions in the context of the dividing cell are poorly understood (7,8). This deficiency is due, in part, to the lack of specific molecular tools for reversible modulation of CDK1 activity in vivo. Several potent small-molecule inhibitors have been reported, but their activity and cell cycle profiles are not consistent with specific CDK1 inhibition (9, 10). Here, we identify a selective and reversible inhibitor of the catalytic activity of human CDK1͞cyclin B1 and CDK1͞cyclin A complexes that allows synchronization of proliferating cells in the late G 2 phase and probing of CDK1 function in the cellular context.
Results and DiscussionWe screened a diverse library of organic compounds for their ability to inhibit the catalytic activity of human CDK1͞cyclin B1. The hits then were tested for selectivity against CDK2͞cyclin E and CDK4͞cyclin D. A class of thiazolinone analogs emerged as a source of ATP-competitive CDK1 inhibitors that were then further optimized for potency, selectivity, and ability to modulate CDK1 in proliferating cells. One quinolinyl thiazolinone derivative, RO-3306, showed good potency, in vitro selectivity, and a cell cycle profile (G 2 ͞M arrest) consistent with CDK1 inhibition (Fig. 1A). RO-3306 inhibited CDK1͞cyclin B1 activity with K i of 35 nM, nearly 10-fold selectivity relative to CDK2͞ cyclin ...
Predicting outcomes in men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer is challenging. This study demonstrates that a new molecular test, the Genomic Prostate Score, which can be performed on a patient's original prostate needle biopsy, can predict the aggressiveness of the cancer and help men make decisions regarding the need for immediate treatment of their cancer.
BackgroundThe Oncotype DX® Prostate Cancer Assay is a multi-gene RT-PCR expression assay that was developed for use with fixed paraffin-embedded (FPE) diagnostic prostate needle biopsies containing as little as 1 mm of prostate tumor in the greatest dimension. The assay measures expression of 12 cancer-related genes representing four biological pathways and 5 reference genes which are algorithmically combined to calculate the Genomic Prostate Score (GPS). This biopsy-based assay has been analytically and subsequently clinically validated as a predictor of aggressive prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to validate the analytical performance of the Oncotype DX Prostate Cancer Assay using predefined acceptance criteria.ResultsThe lowest quartile of RNA yields from prostate needle biopsies (six 5 μm sections) was between 19 and 34 ng. Analytical validation of the process requiring as little as 5 ng of RNA met all pre-defined acceptance criteria. Amplification efficiencies, analytical sensitivity, and accuracy of gene assays were measured by serially diluting an RNA sample and analyzing features of the linear regression between RNA expression measured by the crossing point (Cp) versus the log2 of the RNA input per PCR assay well. Gene assays were shown to accurately measure expression over a wide range of inputs (from as low as 0.005 ng to 320 ng). Analytical accuracy was excellent with average biases at qPCR inputs representative of patient samples <9.7% across all assays while amplification efficiencies were within ±6% of the median. Assessments of reproducibility and precision were performed by testing 10 prostate cancer RNA samples over multiple instruments, reagent lots, operators, days (precision), and RNA input levels (reproducibility) using appropriately parameterized linear mixed models. The standard deviations for analytical precision and reproducibility were 1.86 and 2.11 GPS units (100-unit scale) respectively.ConclusionsThe Oncotype DX Prostate Cancer Assay, a clinical RT-PCR assay specifically designed for use with prostate needle biopsies, has been analytically validated using very limited RNA inputs. The assay requirements and analytical performance will provide physicians with test results from a robust and reliable assay which will enable improved treatment decisions for men diagnosed with early-stage prostate cancer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.