Background. There is a scarcity of data on the consequences of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) infections in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) from emerging countries. Methods. Here, we present a cohort study of 13 transplant centers in India including 250 KTR (226 living and 24 deceased donors) with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19 positivity from March 23, 2020, until September 15, 2020. We detailed demographics, immunosuppression regimen, clinical profile, treatment, and outcomes. Results. Median age of transplant recipients was 43 years, and recipients presented at a median of 3.5 years after transplant. Most common comorbidities (94%) included arterial hypertension (84%) and diabetes (32%); presenting symptoms at the time of COVID-19 included fever (88%), cough (72%), and sputum production (52%). Clinical severity ranged from asymptomatic (6%), mild (60%), and moderate (20%) to severe (14%). Strategies to modify immunosuppressants included discontinuation of antimetabolites without changes in calcineurin inhibitors and steroids (60%). Risk factors for mortality included older age; dyspnea; severe disease; obesity; allograft dysfunction before COVID-19 infection; acute kidney injury; higher levels of inflammatory markers including C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 level, and procalcitonin; chest X-ray abnormality, and intensive care unit/ventilator requirements. Overall patient mortality was 11.6% (29 of 250), 14.5% (29 of 200) in hospitalized patients, 47% (25 of 53) in intensive care unit patients, and 96.7% (29 of 30) in patients requiring ventilation. KTRs with mild COVID-19 symptoms (n = 50) were managed as outpatients to optimize the utilization of scarce resources during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions. Mortality rates in COVID-19-positive KTR appear to be higher than those in nonimmunosuppressed patients, and high mortality was noted among those requiring intensive care and those on ventilator.

Background. There is lack of data on feasibility and safety of kidney transplants from living donors who recovered from COVID-19. Methods. Here, we present a retrospective cohort study of 31 kidney transplant recipients (KTR) from living donors who recovered from polymerase chain reaction confirmed COVID-19 across 19 transplant centers in India from July 3, 2020, to December 5, 2020. We detailed demographics, clinical manifestations, immunosuppression regimen, treatment, and outcomes. Donors with a previous diagnosis of COVID-19 were accepted after documenting 2 negative polymerase chain reaction tests with complete symptom resolution for at least 28 days and significant social distancing for 14 days before surgery. Results. COVID-19 clinical severity in donors ranged from completely asymptomatic (71%, n = 22) to mild infection (29%, n = 9). None progressed to moderate or severe stages of the disease in the entire clinical course of home treatment. Patient and graft survival was 100%, respectively, with acute cellular rejection being reported in 6.4% (n = 2) recipient. All recipients and donors were asymptomatic with normal creatinine at median follow-up of 44 days after surgery without any complications relating to surgery and COVID-19. Conclusions. Our data support safety of proceeding with living donation for asymptomatic individuals with comprehensive donor, recipients screening before surgery, using a combination of clinical, radiologic, and laboratory criteria. It could provide new insights into the management of KTR from living donors who have recovered from COVID-19 in India. To the best of our knowledge, this remains the largest cohort of KTR from living donors who recovered from COVID-19.

Background. There is limited current knowledge on feasibility and safety of kidney transplantation in coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) survivors. Methods. We present a retrospective cohort study of 75 kidney transplants in patients who recovered from polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed COVID-19 performed across 22 transplant centers in India from July 3, 2020, to January 31, 2021. We detail demographics, clinical manifestations, immunosuppression regimen, laboratory findings, treatment, and outcomes. Patients with a previous diagnosis of COVID-19 were accepted after documenting 2 negative severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 PCR tests, normal chest imaging with complete resolution of symptom for at least 28 d and significant social distancing for 14 d before surgery. Results. Clinical severity in patients ranged from asymptomatic (n = 17, 22.7%), mild (n = 36.48%), moderate (n = 15.20%), and severe (n = 7.9.3%) disease. Median duration between PCR positive to transplant was 60 d (overall) and increased significantly from asymptomatic, mild, moderate, and severe disease (49, 57, 83, 94 d, P 0.019), respectively. All recipients and donors were asymptomatic with normal creatinine after surgery at a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 81 (56-117) d without any complications relating to surgery or COVID-19. Patient and graft survival was 100%, and acute rejection was reported in 6.6%. Conclusions. Prospective kidney transplant recipients post-COVID-19 can be considered for transplantation after comprehensive donor and recipient screening before surgery using a combination of clinical, radiologic, and laboratory criteria, careful pretransplant evaluation, and individualized risk-benefit analysis. Further large-scale prospective studies with longer follow-up will better clarify our initial findings. To date, this remains the first and the largest study of kidney transplantation in COVID-19 survivors.

No abstract

ABOi renal transplantation is a cost-effective modality to increase the donor pool. Contrary to the belief that this modality is extremely expensive and requires elaborate infrastructure, we had a good short-term outcome with a relatively simple and low-cost preconditioning protocol.

Background The impact of COVID-19 in a developing nation is sparsely reported and more importantly the discrepancies in public and private sectors are underexplored. Methods We retrospectively investigated the data on the impact of COVID-19 on renal transplantation, between 2019-2020 in a nationwide analysis from 8 public and 10 private sector hospitals of India. Results On comparing the yearly data, the number of living-related transplants and deceased donor transplants declined by 48% (2610 vs 1370) and 49% (194 vs 99) respectively. The out-patient numbers and in-center admissions decreased by 40.4 % (6,16,741 vs 3,67,962) and 30.8 % (73,190 vs 49,918) respectively. There was no increase in the number of renal or graft biopsies in the COVID-19 era. The number of waitlisted patients on hemodialysis was higher in public (3,04,898 vs 3,38,343) when compared to private (1,63,096 vs 1,50,292) in the last 2 years. Similarly, the number of waitlisted patients on peritoneal dialysis (4655 vs 3526) was higher in public sector compared to private sector (932 vs 745). The decline in living transplants during the pandemic was higher in public setups (58%) compared to the private (49%). On the contrary, the decline in deceased donation was higher in private (57.9%) relative to public (50.6%). Conclusion COVID-19 has adversely affected the transplantation activities across the Indian transplantation centers, with a disproportionately higher impact on waitlisted patients in public sector programs. A sound prioritization of healthcare resources is mandated to safeguard the most deprived and high-risk waitlisted patients during the pandemic.

Patient: Male, 33Final Diagnosis: ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation with high antibody titerSymptoms: Symptoms of end stage real diseaseMedication: —Clinical Procedure:—Specialty: TransplantologyObjective:Management of emergency careBackground:Even though renal transplantation across blood groups is not uncommonly practiced nowadays, there is still hesitation regarding ABO-incompatible transplantation with very high baseline antibody titer. In this case report, the outcome of an ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipient with a high baseline isoagglutinin titer is reported.Case Report:The patient was a non-diabetic, 33-year-old man with end-stage renal disease secondary to chronic glomerulonephritis. The only kidney donor available was his mother, who was blood-group incompatible. The patient’s blood group was O positive, whereas his mother was B positive. We evaluated him for an ABO-incompatible renal transplant. The baseline anti-B isoagglutinin titer was >1: 8196. With a desensitization protocol of low-dose Rituximab, plasmapheresis, and IVIG, this titer was brought down to 1: 32 before transplantation. He successfully underwent renal transplantation across the ABO barrier, and maintains good graft function after 1 year of follow-up.Conclusions:In the present era, a high baseline isoagglutinin titer is no longer a contraindication for successful kidney transplantation in ABO-incompatible recipient-donor pairs.

Iron deficiency anemia is not uncommon in predialysis patients. Oral iron often cannot maintain adequate iron stores. Hence we evaluated the safety and efficacy of total dose infusion (TDI) of iron in these patients. Anemic predialysis patients were screened and those with Hb < 7.0 g/dL and serum ferritin < 200 ng/mL were selected. Patients with active bleeding and acute liver disease were excluded. All patients were on oral iron 100 mg/day. None of the patients were on erythropoeitin. 11 patients (6 males and 5 females), aged 45.9 +/- 15 yrs, were suitable. Hb was 5.9 +/- 1.0 g/dL and serum ferritin was 89.5 + 50 ng/mL. The preparation used was iron dextran. A test dose of 25 mg in 100 mL normal saline was administered over 1 hr to all patients. One patient had fever and chills during the test dose and was not given TDI. 10 patients received TDI. None of these patients had any problem during the infusion. The dose of iron administered was 900 + 316.2 mg. One patient who received 1600 mg had arthralgia-myalgia and another patient had thrombophlebitis following TDI. One month after TDI, Hb was 8.0 + 1.0 g/dL and serum ferritin was 362 ng/mL. We feel that TDI is a safe and effective method of correcting iron deficiency in predialysis patients.