Patient Family Advisory Councils (PFACs) are groups of patients, families, and clinical health system leaders collaborating to improve the quality, safety, and experience of care. Best practices encourage PFAC membership to reflect the diversity of the communities served. A cross-sectional survey was conducted from September 2019 to January 2020 collecting demographic characteristics of the members of a pediatric health system's 17 PFACs. Of the 93 respondents (71.5%), notable inequities were racial (4.8% adult PFAC members vs. 17.4% patients were Black) and financial (adult PFAC median annual income was >$100,000 compared to the community median $77,589). The governing family advisory board used this information to codesign interventions to achieve the ideal state of inclusive excellence by identifying barriers for participation for the Black community, recruiting and retaining diverse board members, and continuous monitoring to maintain a diverse board representation.

Patient Family Advisors (PFAs) are integral partners in quality improvement processes at Children's Mercy Kansas City. Mimicking Joint Commission patient tracers, the Family Experience Tracer program was created to gather perspectives from end users of care and provide valuable insights regarding the patient experience. The Patient and Family Engagement team collaborates with departmental and organizational leadership to define the scope of the tracer project and determine meaningful topics to elicit feedback from patients and families. Tracers are conducted across the continuum of care and are led by a Patient Family Advisor to establish an immediate peer relationship. Patients and families provide detailed information in Family Experience Tracers, and CM acknowledges the importance of combining this information with other feedback sources to strengthen patient-and family-centered improvements.

Background Patient- and family-centered care (PFCC) approaches to care are important in enhancing the patient-centeredness of the health care experience, yet little is known about the effectiveness of formal approaches for teaching patient-centeredness in residency. Intervention We developed and implemented a PFCC curriculum and assessed its impact on residents' self-perceptions of patient-centered behavior and practices. Methods We used a quasi-experimental, nonrandomized approach with a pretest-posttest design. An experimental group of 24 interns filled out the Patient Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS) before residency, and a control group of 18 graduating residents who had not been exposed to a PFCC curriculum also completed the PPOS. After 2 years of residency and exposure to a PFCC curriculum, interns in the experimental group repeated the PPOS. We compared mean total and subscale PPOS scores. Results There was no difference in baseline total or subscale PPOS scores between the experimental and control group. The mean total PPOS score for the experimental group after exposure to the curriculum was 4.55 (P  =  .45), reflecting no change in patient-centeredness. The 17 female interns in the intervention group were more patient centered (4.8 ± 0.36) than the 6 male interns (4.2 ± 0.38) (P  =  .005), scoring significantly higher (4.6 ± 0.39 versus 4.0 ± 0.38) in the sharing domain (P  =  .001). Conclusion Interns' exposure to a PFCC curriculum did not result in a change in their perceived patient-centeredness. Most pediatrics residents at our children's hospital perceive themselves as patient and family centered at the start of residency and remain so throughout.

No abstract

No abstract