When pharmacists incorporate clinical practice into their routine, barriers and facilitators influence the implementation of patient care services. Three focus groups were conducted with 11 pharmacists who were working for the Farmácia Popular do Brasil program on the establishment, implementation, and consolidation of clinical pharmacy services. The perception of the pharmacists in Brazil about the program was that it facilitated access to health care and medication. The distance between neighboring cities made it difficult for patients to return for services. Lack of staff training created a lack of communication skills and knowledge. The pharmacists wanted to have increased technical support, skill development opportunities, and monitoring of researchers who assessed progress of the service. Pharmacists overcame many of their insecurities and felt more proactive and committed to quality service. Positive experiences in service implementations have shown that it is possible to develop a model of clinical services in community pharmacies.
RESUMO Introdução: A internet é uma ferramenta imprescindível na atualidade, pois possibilita acesso fácil e rápido às informações e a manutenção de laços afetivos por meio das redes sociais. Entretanto, quando se percebe um uso descontrolado e desadaptativo, ocorre a chamada adicção por internet (AI KEYWORDS-Medical Students.-Internet.-Social Networks.-Dependency.-Anxiety.-Depression. ABSTRACT Introduction:The internet is now an essential tool, through which people enjoy easy and rapid access to information and can maintain personal relationships through social networks. However, when its
RESUMO Objetivo: O objetivo desta pesquisa é verificar a prevalência de sintomas de sofrimento psíquico em estudantes do curso de Medicina durante a pandemia da COVID-19. Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo transversal e exploratório que avaliou 656 estudantes do curso de Medicina do Brasil. Os dados foram coletados, em maio e junho de 2020, por meio de dois instrumentos autoaplicáveis. O primeiro foi um questionário elaborado pelos próprios autores para avaliar o perfil social, demográfico e cultural da população. Para o rastreamento de indícios de sofrimento psíquico, utilizou-se o Self-Report Questionnaire, um questionário com 20 itens divididos em quatro domínios. Durante a análise de dados, as associações entre variáveis categóricas foram testadas por meio do teste qui-quadrado de Pearson. O nível de significância adotado foi de 5%. Resultados: A prevalência de indivíduos com indícios de sofrimento psíquico foi de 62,8%. São fatores de risco para o adoecimento mental durante a pandemia da COVID-19: ser do sexo feminino, estar nos dois primeiros anos do curso, relatar má adaptação ao ensino a distância, apresentar dificuldade de concentração, preocupar-se com o atraso da graduação, ter um diagnóstico prévio de transtorno mental, morar com alguém que precisa trabalhar fora de casa, ser incapaz de manter hábitos saudáveis e ter medo de ser infectado pelo vírus. Conclusão: Este estudo demonstrou que os indícios de sofrimento psíquico estão elevados entre estudantes de Medicina durante a pandemia da COVID-19. Além disso, também foi possível concluir que há fatores protetores para o adoecimento mental.
BackgroundClinical Pharmacy Services (CPS) are a reality in many health systems around the world. However, there are few studies that discuss the facilitators and the strategies to implement CPS in healthcare systems. In this way, the objective of this study was to identify the facilitators and strategies involved in the CPS implementation process in some public health units in a metropolis in the Northeast Brazil.MethodsA qualitative study was carried out with health-system pharmacists and managers who experienced the implementation of CPS. Therefore, focus groups were conducted with pharmacists, and the interviews with the managers. The discussions were carried out through semi-structured scripts and were recorded in audio and videos, after the signature of the consent form. The recordings were transcribed and analyzed independently through content analysis, followed by consensus meetings between researchers.ResultsTwo focus groups were conducted, with an average of seven pharmacists per group, and five interviews with local health managers. Participants reported 39 facilitators who were related to the categories: local healthcare network, healthcare team, pharmacists and implementation process of the CPS. And 21 strategies attributed to the following categories: local healthcare network, pharmacists and implementation process of the CPS.ConclusionsThis study identified facilitators and strategies of the implementation of CPS. Most of the positive experiences were related to the clinical skills and proactive attitudes of pharmacists. These findings may support pharmacists and health managers to implement CPS in health systems.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3403-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Qualitative study held in an emergency hospital in Aracaju-SE, which aimed to know the perception of nurses about what is a motivated nursing team, to identify possible motivational policies used by them and if they are consistent with the policies proposed by Frederick Herzberg in his theory. Of the 20 nurses participants, the most understood the motivation as a set of techniques possible to shape the behavior of the individual at work, linking it to extrinsic factors and 60% did not consider his team motivated. The types of motivational policies that usually apply realized that these correspond to intrinsic factors aimed at self recovery and self realization of individuals in the tasks running.
BackgroundDuring the process of implementation of clinical pharmacy services, internal and external factors may favor or hinder the incorporation of care into the hospital routine. This study aimed to understand the perceptions of a group of hospital pharmacists and other professionals of the implementation of clinical pharmacy at a high complexity public hospital in Brazil.MethodsA focus group with 16 pharmacists and interviews with tree key stakeholders including managers in the pharmaceutical, medical, and nursing profession were conducted to understand their perceptions of the implementation clinical pharmacy services in a high complexity public hospital in Brazil. The service proposal was presented to the selected participants before conducting the focus group. Professionals with an overview of the hospital and influence on the relevant departments for the implementation of clinical pharmacy at the institution were selected. Data collected were transcribed and analyzed using the Bardin Content Analysis technique. Data analyzed were systematized into categories and registration units. The methodology involves the organization and analysis of reported content to make inferences.ResultsThe data obtained were divided into four categories: “Perception of the current situation”, “Implementation expectations”, “Barriers to implementation”, “Implementation facilitators”. Participants discussed the stagnation of clinical activities of the pharmaceutical profession in Brazil, a reality that results from a lack of clinical training in the country. Pharmacists expressed their expectations for changes in professional performance. According to the managers, such services would positively affect clinical outcomes for patients. Gaps in academic education, lack of knowledge, and poor communication skills were barriers reported in this study. Pharmacists’ clinical experience has been reported to facilitate the provision of services.ConclusionsThis study highlights factors that may influence the implementation of clinical pharmacy services in the institution analyzed, such as resistance, fear, and frustration as barriers, as well the experience in clinical pharmacy of some pharmacists in the institution was one of the facilitators most cited by participants. This knowledge may aid future planning for the implementation of clinical pharmacy in hospitals.
BackgroundCLinical pharmacy services (CPS) are professional services provided by pharmacists, who use their skills and knowledge to take an active role in patient health. These services have expanded in health systems around the world. However, it is important to have a comprehensive understanding of factors that may hinder the implementation of CPS in health systems.ObjectiveTo identify pharmacists’ and managers’ perceptions of barriers regarding the implementation of CPS in some public health units in a metropolis in Northeast Brazil.MethodsThis is a qualitative study based on focus groups and semi-structured, face-to-face, in-depth interviews. Participants were health-system pharmacists and managers, selected based on their direct participation in the implementation process. Focus groups were carried out with the pharmacists, and interviews were carried out with managers. The audio and videos were transcribed verbatim in full, and were independently analyzed using content analysis. This study was approved by the Brazilian Committee of Ethics in Research and all participants signed informed consent forms.FindingsThere were two focus groups and five interviews. The discussions generated 240 minutes of recordings. The health-system pharmacists and managers expressed barriers were allocated into five categories to facilitate a comprehensive understanding of the implementation of CPS; these barriers were related to: the local healthcare networks, the healthcare team, the pharmacists, the implementation process, and the patients.ConclusionsThis study revealed the perceptions of barriers associated with the participants involved in the implementation of CPS in some public health units in a metropolis in Northeast Brazil. The barriers reflect the challenges to be overcome in the CPS implementation process in the health systems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.