No abstract

Recent progress in elucidating the complex and heterogeneous interactions between malignancy and coagulation or fibrinolysis reactions in humans has clarified the pathogenesis of disseminated intravascular coagulation that occurs with malignancy and has revealed evidence for two distinct pathways of growth regulation based on production by tumor cells of initiators of thrombin formation versus plasminogen activators. We have proposed a preliminary classification of tumors (see Table 2) based on these interactions. Type I tumors are those in which the tumor cells are associated with an intact coagulation pathway that leads to thrombin formation at the tumor periphery but in which the tumor cells lack u-PA. Examples of tumors in this category include SCCL, malignant melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma. Type II tumors are those in which the tumor cells express u-PA but lack an associated coagulation pathway leading to thrombin formation. Examples of type II tumors include prostate cancer, colon cancer, breast cancer, and N-SCLC. Type III tumors are those that express neither of these pathways, or exhibit some other pattern of interaction. Obviously, this formulation must be regarded as hypothetical. However, this concept fits with the limited data available to date from clinical trials. More importantly, this hypothesis can be tested further by means of intervention aimed at interrupting pathways relevant to specific tumor types. Characterization of additional tumor types by the methods described should permit amplification of this classification of tumors and other patterns of interaction may be defined. Exploration of the coagulation-cancer interaction holds considerable promise for gaining new understanding of both the coagulation mechanism and tumor biology. Most intriguing is the prospect that imaginative approaches to cancer treatment may be devised that are not only relatively nontoxic and low cost, but also effective.

Safety and efficacy of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for hospitalized patients with cirrhosis: a single-center retrospective cohort study. J Thromb Haemost 2015; 13: 1245-53. Summary. Background: Hospitalized patients with cirrhosis are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). The benefits and risks of pharmacological thromboprohylaxis in these patients have not been well studied. Objectives: To examine the safety and efficacy of pharmacological VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized cirrhotic patients. Patients/Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients with cirrhosis hospitalized at an academic tertiary care referral center over a 5-year period. Results: Six hundred hospital admissions accounting for 402 patients were included. VTE prophylaxis was administered during 296 (49%) admissions. Patients receiving VTE prophylaxis were older (59 years vs. 55 years, P < 0.001), had longer lengths of stay (9.6 days vs. 6.8 days, P = 0.002), and lower Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores (13.2 vs. 16.1, P < 0.001). In-hospital bleeding events (8.1% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.258), gastrointestinal bleeding events (3.0% vs. 3.2% P = 0.52), new VTE events (2.37% vs. 1.65%, P = 0.537), and mortality (8.4% vs. 7.3%, P = 0.599) were similar in the two groups. VTE prophylaxis did not reduce the risk of VTE (odds ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.23-3.71), and patients receiving unfractionated heparin, but not low molecular weight heparin, were at increased risk for in-hospital bleeding events (odds ratio 2.38, 95% confidence interval 1. 15-4.94 vs. 0.87, 0.37-2.05, respectively). Conclusion: The rate of VTE in this cohort of hospitalized cirrhotic patients was low and was unaffected by pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. Unfractionated heparin was associated with an increased risk for in-hospital bleeding, suggesting that if thromboprophylaxis is indicated, low molecular weight heparin may be favored.

Background: Nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterases (NPPs) metabolize extracellular purinergic signals. Results: NPP4 and NPP1 exhibit nearly identical active site geometry but distinct substrate specificity. Conclusion: A tripartite lysine claw in NPP1 stabilizes ATP in the catalytic pocket. NPP4 lacks this motif and is unable to hydrolyze ATP effectively. Significance: Understanding NPP4 and NPP1 catalysis enables insight into the pathogenesis of stroke and ectopic bone mineralization.