BACKGROUND: Apricoxib, a novel once-daily selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, was investigated in combination with erlotinib for recurrent stage IIIB/IV nonsmall cell lung cancer to determine the maximum tolerated dose, doselimiting toxicity, and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) based on changes in urinary prostaglandin E 2 metabolite (PGE-M). METHODS: Patients received escalating doses of apricoxib (100, 200, and 400 mg/day) in combination with erlotinib 150 mg/day until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Urinary PGE-M was used to assess biologic activity and inform the optimal biologic dose. RESULTS: Twenty patients were treated (3 at 100 mg; 3 at 200 mg; 14 at 400 mg apricoxib) with a median of 4 cycles (range, 2-14 cycles); 8 patients (40%) received prior EGFRdirected therapies. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. Study drug-related adverse events (AEs) included diarrhea, rash, dry skin, anemia, fatigue, and increased serum creatinine; 4 patients had grade !3 drug-related AEs (diarrhea, perforated duodenal ulcer, hypophosphatemia, and deep vein thrombosis). The RP2D was 400 mg/day based on safety, biologic activity based on decreases in urinary PGE-M, and pharmacokinetics. One patient had a partial response, and 11 had stable disease. Stable disease was observed in patients who had received prior EGFR inhibitor therapy but was greater in patients not previously treated with an EGFR inhibitor. Seventeen patients had elevated urinary PGE-M at baseline, and 14 (70%) had a decrease from baseline, which was associated with disease control. CONCLUSIONS: Apricoxib plus erlotinib was well tolerated and yielded a 60% disease control rate. A phase II trial is currently investigating 400 mg/day apricoxib plus 150 mg/day erlotinib in patients selected based on change in urinary PGE-M. Cancer 2011;117:809-18.
TPS11626 Background: Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a rare cancer that affects children and young adults. Patients with recurrent/refractory ES have a poor prognosis (5-year survival 10-15%) with no improvement despite advances in cytotoxic and targeted therapies. Genomic rearrangements resulting in fusion proteins and over-expression of ets family transcription factors occur in 95% of ES. In particular, the EWS-FLI1 oncogenic fusion creates a constitutively active transcription factor that drives the malignant ES phenotype. Strategies to target the EWS-FLI1 fusion protein have been limited by lack of specificity. A promising approach is to target the interaction of the ets transcription factor with its critical protein partner, RNA helicase A (RHA). TK216 is a novel small-molecule that directly binds to EWS-FLI1 and inhibits its function by blocking binding to RHA. TK216 demonstrates potent anti-proliferative effects on ES cell lines and xenografts. Methods: We initiated a Phase 1, first-in-human, open-label, multi-center, dose-escalation/dose-expansion trial of TK216 in patients with recurrent/refractory ES who are ≥12 years of age (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02657005). TK216 is dosed based on body surface area and administered as a continuous intravenous infusion for 7 days followed by 14 days rest every 21 days. Treatment may continue in the absence of disease progression. One intrapatient dose escalation is allowed. Enrollment of 6 to 8 cohorts using a 3+3 dose-escalation design is anticipated. During dose expansion, a total of 18 patients with ES will be accrued at the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). The primary objective of the study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose and RP2D of TK216. Secondary objectives are to assess the safety profile, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of TK216. Molecular assays will be performed to characterize EWS-FLI or EWS-ets abnormalities in archival tumor tissue. The overall response rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival will be determined in the expansion cohort. Nine patients have been enrolled since June 2016. Accrual to cohorts 1, 2, and 3 completed and cohort 4 opened in January 2017. Clinical trial information: NCT02657005.
7527 Background: Cirmtuzumab (C) is a humanized mAb that binds ROR1 and blocks Wnt5a from binding and activating ROR1 on CLL and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL); C does not bind normal adult tissues. A phase 1 trial of C showed excellent safety and inhibition of Wnt5a-ROR1 signaling. Ibrutinib (Ibr) does not inhibit the ROR1 pathway, and C+Ibr exert synergistic effects in CLL and MCL. The current clinical trial combines C+Ibr for patients (pts) with CLL and MCL. A planned analysis of the phase 1 CLL portion is presented. Methods: Eligible pts had CLL needing treatment according to iwCLL guidelines. C was given at 2, 4, 8, or 16 mg/kg q 2 wk for 8 wk, then q 28 d to 52 wk. Ibr 420 mg PO daily was started on d 28. Results: 3 pts were treated at each C dose level with age 57-86; 75% were previously treated (median 2); 3 pts had del(11q), 3 had trisomy 12, and 6 pts had unmutated IGVH genes. There were no discontinuations for toxicity and no dose limiting toxicities. Treatment with C alone and combined with Ibr was well-tolerated. One SAE occurred with C monotherapy (hospitalization for tonsillitis). Adverse events on C+Ibr were consistent with the known Ibr safety profile, with one grade 3 hyperkalemia and 1 atrial fibrillation event. All other AEs were grade 1 or 2. The overall response rate after 16-48 weeks of treatment was 67% with 1 confirmed complete response (CR) with no morphologic evidence of CLL in the marrow, 1 clinical CR, 6 partial responses (PR) and 4 stable disease. No patient had progressive disease. The typical redistributive lymphocytosis seen with Ibr was blunted, with only a 50% mean rise in ALC, rapidly returning to baseline. PRs were observed in all C dose levels. Conclusions: The combination of C+Ibr is well-tolerated and effective. CRs were observed in 2 cases, a result that would be highly unusual with Ibr monotherapy in CLL. Based on these findings, Cirm 600 mg was selected as the RP2D for the randomized phase 2 portion of this protocol, which will prospectively compare the complete response rates between C+Ibr and Ibr alone. Clinical trial information: NCT03420183.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.