Although the rodent comet assay is gaining acceptance as a standard technique for evaluating DNA damage in vivo, there is no internationally accepted guideline for its conduct and several aspects of its experimental design have not been optimized. For example, no standard positive control is used, there is no agreement on how tissue toxicity should be measured and sources of experimental variability have not been considered in relation to experimental design. This study showed that methylnitrosourea is a good alternative positive control inducing DNA damage in all tissues examined (stomach, liver, blood and bone marrow) over a dose range of 25-100 mg/kg at both 3 and 24 h after treatment. At the highest dose, significant toxicity was seen in all tissues using the neutral diffusion assay and also by histopathological/haematological analysis, except in the liver where no change was seen even 7 days after dosing. Analyses using control data pooled from several studies showed that, as expected, the greatest variability was seen between tissue preparations from different animals and that different numbers of animals were required to detect the same fold increases in different tissues. Power analyses showed that, preparing three gels for each tissue and scoring 50 nuclei per gel, a group of six animals allows 2-fold increases over control in the liver, bone marrow and stomach and a 3-fold increase in blood to be detected with 80% probability. It is recommended that similar investigations of experimental variability should be performed to determine optimal experimental design in any laboratory using the rodent comet assay.
Although the rodent bone marrow micronucleus test has been in routine use for over 20 years, little work has been published to support its experimental design and all this has used the mouse rather than the rat. When it was decided to change the strain of rat routinely used in this laboratory to the Han Wistar, a preliminary study was performed to investigate the possible factors influencing experimental variability and to use statistical tools to examine possible study designs. Subsequently, a historical database comprising of vehicle controls accumulated from 65 studies was used to establish test acceptance criteria and a strategy for analysing equivocal results. The following conclusions were made: (i) no statistically significant differences were observed in experimental variability within or between control animals; although not statistically significant, the majority of experimental variability seen was found to be between separate counts on the same slide, with minimal differences found between duplicate slides from the same rat or between individual rats; (ii) power analyses showed that, if an equivocal result is obtained after scoring 2000 immature erythrocytes (IE), it is appropriate to re-code the slides and score an additional 4000 IE, i.e. analysing a total of 6000 IE; no meaningful increase in statistical power is gained by scoring >6000 IE; this is consistent with the variability observed between separate counts on the same slide; (iii) there was no significant difference between the control micronucleated immature erythrocyte (MIE) values at 24 and 48 h after dosing or between males and females; therefore, if an unusually low control value at either time point results in apparent small increases in MIE in a treated group, it is valid to pool control values from both time points for clarification and (iv) similar statistical power can be achieved by scoring 2000 IE from seven rats or 4000 IE from five rats, respectively. However, this is based only on control animals and does not consider possible differences in responses between animals to treatment with a potential genotoxin. In order to minimize the possible influence of responders and non-responders, the preferred study design in this laboratory is to score 2000 IE from groups of seven rats. Study data obtained over time confirmed observations made in the control study. Also from an ethical viewpoint, clarifying equivocal responses by combining control data from the 24- and 48-h time points and/or increasing the number of IE scored per animal has minimized the numbers of repeat studies necessary to determine the genotoxic status of a novel compound. However, before any laboratory can use these procedures, experimental data must be generated to demonstrate their validity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.