Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are a family of enzymes involved in the regulation of gene expression, DNA repair, and stress response. These processes often are altered in tumors, and HDAC inhibitors have had pronounced antitumor activity with promising results in clinical trials. Here, we report the crystal structure of human HDAC8 in complex with a hydroxamic acid inhibitor. Such a structure of a eukaryotic zinc-dependent HDAC has not be described previously. Similar to bacterial HDAC-like protein, HDAC8 folds in a single ␣͞␤ domain. The inhibitor and the zinc-binding sites are similar in both proteins. However, significant differences are observed in the length and structure of the loops surrounding the active site, including the presence of two potassium ions in HDAC8 structure, one of which interacts with key catalytic residues. CD data suggest a direct role of potassium in the fold stabilization of HDAC8. Knockdown of HDAC8 by RNA interference inhibits growth of human lung, colon, and cervical cancer cell lines, highlighting the importance of this HDAC subtype for tumor cell proliferation. Our findings open the way for the design and development of selective inhibitors of HDAC8 as possible antitumor agents.T he epigenetic control of gene expression is operated through a series of posttranslational modifications of chromatin that influence the electrostatics of DNA-protein interactions and generate docking sites for a large number of chromatininteracting proteins (1, 2). The acetylation status of lysine residues found in the accessible N termini of core histones is one of the posttranslational chromatin modifications that impinge on gene expression. Acetylation and deacetylation of histones are controlled by the enzymatic activity of histone acetyltransferases and histone deacetylases (HDACs) (3, 4). Alterations of gene expression are a hallmark of cancer, and mounting evidence suggests that at least a part of these alterations is mediated by epigenetic mechanisms (5, 6). Importantly, the aberrant recruitment of HDACs has been mechanistically linked to malignancy in leukemias and lymphomas (7,8), and small-molecule HDAC inhibitors show antitumor activity in preclinical models and in clinical trials and have the promise to become effective, new antineoplastic therapeutics (9).At least 18 HDAC subtypes exist, and they are subdivided into three classes (10): class I (HDACs 1-3 and 8), homologous to the yeast Rpd3 deacetylase; class II (HDACs 4-7, 9, and 10), related to the yeast Hda1 deacetylase; and class III proteins (Sirtuins 1-7), which are yeast Sir2 homologs. HDAC11 has homology to both class I and II enzymes but cannot unambiguously be assigned to either class. Class I and II HDACs, as well as HDAC11, are all zinc-dependent hydrolases. The therapeutically relevant HDAC inhibitors are thought to be nonselective or poorly selective inhibitors of all or most of class I and II enzymes but do not inhibit class III HDACs (9). It is not clear whether the antitumor properties of HDAC inhibitors are due to their l...

H‐NS is a major component of the bacterial nucleoid, involved in condensing and packaging DNA and modulating gene expression. The mechanism by which this is achieved remains unclear. Genetic data show that the biological properties of H‐NS are influenced by its oligomerization properties. We have applied a variety of biophysical techniques to study the structural basis of oligomerization of the H‐NS protein from Salmonella typhimurium. The N‐terminal 89 amino acids are responsible for oligomerization. The first 64 residues form a trimer dominated by an α‐helix, likely to be in coiled–coil conformation. Extending this polypeptide to 89 amino acids generated higher order, heterodisperse oligomers. Similarly, in the full‐length protein no single, defined oligomeric state is adopted. The C‐terminal 48 residues do not participate in oligomerization and form a monomeric, DNA‐binding domain. These N‐ and C‐terminal domains are joined via a flexible linker which enables them to function independently within the context of the full‐length protein. This novel mode of oligomerization may account for the unusual binding properties of H‐NS.

The Fyn SH3 domain has a well-defined structure in solution. The relative binding affinities of the three ligand peptides and their orientation within the Fyn SH3 complex were consistent with recently proposed models for the binding of 'consensus' polyproline sequences. Although the affinities of consensus and non-consensus peptides are different, the degree of difference is not very large, suggesting that SH3 domains bind to polyproline peptides in a promiscuous manner.

The interaction of the Fyn SH3 domain with the p85 subunit of PI3-kinase is investigated using structural detail and thermodynamic data. The solution structure complex of the SH3 domain with a proline-rich peptide mimic of the binding site on the p85 subunit is described. This indicates that the peptide binds as a poly(L-proline) type II helix. Circular dichroism spectroscopic studies reveal that in the unbound state the peptide exhibits no structure. Thermodynamic data for the binding of this peptide to the SH3 domain suggest that the weak binding (approximately 31 microM) of this interaction is, in part, due to the entropically unfavorable effect of helix formation (delta S0 = -78 J.mol-1.K-1). Binding of the SH3 domain to the intact p85 subunit (minus its own SH3 domain) is tighter, and the entropic and enthalpic contributions are very different from those given by the peptide interaction (delta S0 = +252 J.mol-1.K-1; delta H0 = +44 kJ.mol-1). From these dramatically different thermodynamic measurements we are able to conclude that the interaction of the proline-rich peptide does not effectively mimic the interaction of the intact p85 subunit with the SH3 domain and suggest that other interactions could be important.