B. bacilliformis presents a constitutive resistance to quinolones, which may be related to the presence of Ala at position 91 of GyrA and 85 of ParC. These results advise against the current clinical guidelines recommending the use of ciprofloxacin to treat bartonellosis in some countries of the Andean area.

BackgroundThe purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of different root canal disinfection techniques in the elimination of a multi-species biofilm from inside the root canal.Material and MethodsFifty mandibular first premolars were used in the present study, standardized to 11mm of root length, and instrumented with a reciprocation system Reciproc, (VDW GmbH, Munich, Germany) to a #50. Longitudinally sectioned halves of the roots were obtained and washed with NaOCl 4%, EDTA 17% and 5% sodium thiosulfate, and sterilized by autoclaving for 15 minutes at 121°C. A multi-species biofilm broth was developed with three strains of bacteria under laboratory conditions: Enterococcus faecalis ATTC 29212, Eikenella corrodens ATTC 23834, Streptococcus anginosus ATTC 33397. Roots were autoclaved and transferred to the broth for 4 days and then were subjected to either disinfection with sodium hypochlorite 4% and XP-endo Finisher (FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) or chlorhexidine 2% with and without activation with XP-endo Finisher (FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland).ResultsThe evaluations of the biofilm elimination showed results that indicate that the 4% sodium hypochlorite group with positive pressure irrigation presented significant differences with the group that had irrigation with sodium hypochlorite activated with XP-endo Finisher and the chlorhexidine groups to 2% (P<0.05).ConclusionsChlorhexidine 2% activated with the XP-endo Finisher does not exert elimination or improved cleaning effect on the multi-species biofilm. Activation of sodium hypochlorite 4% improved the elimination of the multi-species biofilm. Key words:Biofilm, multispecies, chlorhexidine, sodium hypochlorite.

The aim was to assess the effect of XP‐endo Finisher (XPF) on multispecies biofilm removal, in comparison with passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and conventional syringe irrigation (CSI), by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Fifty mandibular first premolars were instrumented, longitudinally sectioned. The split halves were incubated for 4 days with a broth obtained from three bacteria strains: Enterococcus faecalis, Eikenella corrodens and Streptococcus anginosus. Subsequently, the re‐approximated split halves were irrigated with 4% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) or water using CSI, and the final irrigation protocols were CSI with 4% NaOCl (CSI+4%NaOCl), PUI+4%NaOCl, XPF+4%NaOCl and CSI+water. The analysis of biofilm removal was performed using SEM images. There were no differences between PUI and XPF (P > 0.05), and both groups promoted higher biofilm removal than CSI+4%NaOCl and CSI+water groups (P < 0.05). It can be concluded the multispecies biofilm removal was significantly improved using XPF and PUI when compared to CSI.

No abstract

El objetivo del presente trabajo fue determinar si los puestos de venta de carne de pollo son una fuente de contaminación con Escherichia coli shigatoxigénica (STEC) en mercados de abastos. Se tomaron hisopados de la superficie de manos, tablas de picar y mesas de expendio de 50 puestos de expendio de carne de pollo en el distrito de San Juan de Miraflores, Lima, Perú (n=150 muestras). Se realizó aislamiento microbiológico estándar e identificación molecular de los genes stx1, stx2 y eaeA mediante PCR. El 42% (63/150) y 25.3% (38/150) de las muestras fueron positivas a E. coli y STEC, respectivamente. El 84% (42/50) y 66% (33/50) de los puestos de venta poseían al menos una de las superficies contaminadas con E. coli y STEC, respectivamente. El 68.3% (43/63) de las cepas de E. coli aisladas fueron patógenas por presentar al menos un gen evaluado. De estas, 38 cepas fueron STEC y presentaron los genes stx1 (19.0%, 12/63), stx2 (14.3%, 9/63) y las asociaciones: stx1 y stx2 (12.7%, 8/63), stx1, stx2 y eaeA (6.3%, 4/63), stx2 y eaeA (4.8%, 3/63), y stx1 y eaeA (3.2%, 2/63). Se observaron prácticas de higiene deficientes en el puesto de venta y durante el expendio. Se confirma que los puestos de venta de carne de pollo del mercado limeño son fuente potencial de contaminación de STEC.