Perspectives on the classification of eukaryotic diversity have changed rapidly in recent years, as the four eukaryotic groups within the five-kingdom classification-plants, animals, fungi, and protists-have been transformed through numerous permutations into the current system of six ''supergroups.'' The intent of the supergroup classification system is to unite microbial and macroscopic eukaryotes based on phylogenetic inference. This supergroup approach is increasing in popularity in the literature and is appearing in introductory biology textbooks. We evaluate the stability and support for the current six-supergroup classification of eukaryotes based on molecular genealogies. We assess three aspects of each supergroup: (1) the stability of its taxonomy, (2) the support for monophyly (single evolutionary origin) in molecular analyses targeting a supergroup, and (3) the support for monophyly when a supergroup is included as an out-group in phylogenetic studies targeting other taxa. Our analysis demonstrates that supergroup taxonomies are unstable and that support for groups varies tremendously, indicating that the current classification scheme of eukaryotes is likely premature. We highlight several trends contributing to the instability and discuss the requirements for establishing robust clades within the eukaryotic tree of life.Citation: Parfrey LW, Barbero E, Lasser E, Dunthorn M, Evaluating support for the current classification of eukaryotic diversity. PLoS Genet 2(12): e220.
Sequence comparisons of small subunit ribosomal RNA coding regions from 12 chlorophylls a + c-containing algae were used to infer phylogenetic relationships within the Chromophytao Three chromophyte lines of descent, delineated by the Bacillariophyceae, the Phaeophyceael Xanthophyceae, and the Chrysophyceae/Eustigmatophyceae/Synurophyceae are members of a complex evolutionary assemblage, which also includes representatives of the Oomycota ("lower" fungi). Maximum parsimony and distance matrix methods demonstrate a common evolutionary history for these lineages but their relative branching order could not be determined. Other algal species with chlorophylls a + c, including dinoflagellates and prymnesiophytes, are not members of this complex assemblage. Dinoflagellates are specifically related to apicomplexans and ciliates, and the prymnesiophyte, Emiliania huxleyi, represents an independent photosynthetic lineage that separated from other eukaryotes during the nearly simultaneous divergence of plants, animals, fungi, and a number of other protist lineages. The small subunit rRNA phylogenies of chromophytes/oomycetes were compared to those derived from comparisons of ultrastructural characters. Only tubular, tripartite mastigonemes (flagellar hairs) characterized all studied taxa of chromophytes/oomycetes as a monophyletic assemblage.
Within microeukaryotes, genetic and functional variation sometimes accumulate more quickly than morphological differences. To understand the evolutionary history and ecology of such lineages, it is key to examine diversity at multiple levels of organization. In the dinoflagellate family Symbiodiniaceae, which can form endosymbioses with cnidarians (e.g., corals, octocorals, sea anemones, jellies), other marine invertebrates (e.g., sponges, molluscs, flatworms), and protists (e.g., foraminifera), molecular data have been used extensively over the past three decades to describe phenotypes and to make evolutionary and ecological inferences. Despite advances in Symbiodiniaceae genomics, a lack of consensus among researchers with respect to interpreting genetic data has slowed progress in the field and acted as a barrier to reconciling observations. Here, we identify key challenges regarding the assessment and interpretation of Symbiodiniaceae genetic diversity across three levels: species, populations, and communities. We summarize areas of agreement and highlight techniques and approaches that are broadly accepted. In areas where debate remains, we identify unresolved issues and discuss technologies and approaches that can help to fill knowledge gaps related to genetic and phenotypic diversity. We also discuss ways to stimulate progress, in particular by fostering a more inclusive and collaborative research community. We hope that this perspective will inspire and accelerate coral reef science by serving as a resource to those designing experiments, publishing research, and applying for funding related to Symbiodiniaceae and their symbiotic partnerships.
On page 499 of the above article, an error was introduced into the section entitled "Reprogramming the IM permeome." The sentence in the published version that reads "These data show a major transition in organellogenesis that occurred when the hosts replaced all previous IM solute transporters of the endosymbionts with eukaryote-derived nuclearencoded solute carriers" should refer to the replacement of "most previous IM solute transporters". The editors apologize for the error.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.