BackgroundGene duplication is a genetic mutation that creates functionally redundant gene copies that are initially relieved from selective pressures and may adapt themselves to new functions with time. The levels of gene duplication may vary from small-scale duplication (SSD) to whole genome duplication (WGD). Studies with yeast revealed ample differences between these duplicates: Yeast WGD pairs were functionally more similar, less divergent in subcellular localization and contained a lesser proportion of essential genes. In this study, we explored the differences in evolutionary genomic properties of human SSD and WGD genes, with the identifiable human duplicates coming from the two rounds of whole genome duplication occurred early in vertebrate evolution.ResultsWe observed that these two groups of duplicates were also dissimilar in terms of their evolutionary and genomic properties. But interestingly, this is not like the same observed in yeast. The human WGDs were found to be functionally less similar, diverge more in subcellular level and contain a higher proportion of essential genes than the SSDs, all of which are opposite from yeast. Additionally, we explored that human WGDs were more divergent in their gene expression profile, have higher multifunctionality and are more often associated with disease, and are evolutionarily more conserved than human SSDs.ConclusionsOur study suggests that human WGD duplicates are more divergent and entails the adaptation of WGDs to novel and important functions that consequently lead to their evolutionary conservation in the course of evolution.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-016-2392-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

No abstract

Host–pathogen interaction is one of the most powerful determinants involved in coevolutionary processes covering a broad range of biological phenomena at molecular, cellular, organismal and/or population level. The present study explored host–pathogen interaction from the perspective of human–bacteria protein–protein interaction based on large-scale interspecific and intraspecific interactome data for human and three pathogenic bacterial species, Bacillus anthracis, Francisella tularensis and Yersinia pestis. The network features revealed a preferential enrichment of intraspecific hubs and bottlenecks for both human and bacterial pathogens in the interspecific human–bacteria interaction. Analyses unveiled that these bacterial pathogens interact mostly with human party-hubs that may enable them to affect desired functional modules, leading to pathogenesis. Structural features of pathogen-interacting human proteins indicated an abundance of protein domains, providing opportunities for interspecific domain-domain interactions. Moreover, these interactions do not always occur with high-affinity, as we observed that bacteria-interacting human proteins are rich in protein-disorder content, which correlates positively with the number of interacting pathogen proteins, facilitating low-affinity interspecific interactions. Furthermore, functional analyses of pathogen-interacting human proteins revealed an enrichment in regulation of processes like metabolism, immune system, cellular localization and transport apart from divulging functional competence to bind enzyme/protein, nucleic acids and cell adhesion molecules, necessary for host-microbial cross-talk.

Expression level provides important clues about gene function. Previously, various efforts have been undertaken to profile human genes according to their expression level. Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) do not adopt any rigid conformation under physiological conditions, however, are considered as an important functional class in all domains of life. Based on a human tissue-averaged gene expression level, previous studies showed that IDPs are expressed at a lower level than ordered globular proteins. Here, we examined the gene expression pattern of human ordered and disordered proteins in 32 normal tissues. We noticed that in most of the tissues, ordered and disordered proteins are expressed at a similar level. Moreover, in a number of tissues IDPs were found to be expressed at a higher level than ordered proteins. Rigorous statistical analyses suggested that the lower tissue-averaged gene expression level of IDPs (reported earlier) may be the consequence of their biased gene expression in some specific tissues and higher protein length. When we considered the gene repertory of each tissue we noticed that a number of human tissues (brain, testes, etc.) selectively express a higher fraction of disordered proteins, which help them to maintain higher protein connectivity by forming disordered binding motifs and to sustain their functional specificities. Our results demonstrated that the disordered proteins are indispensable in these tissues for their functional advantages.

Codon usage bias (CUB) and mRNA structural stability are important intrinsic features of mRNA that correlate positively with mRNA expression level. However, it remains unclear whether the mRNA expression level can be regulated by adjusting these two parameters, influencing the mRNAs' structure. Here we explored the influence of CUB and mRNA structural stability on mRNA expression levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, using both wild type and computationally mutated mRNAs. Although in wild type, both CUB and mRNA stability positively regulate the mRNA expression level, any deviation from natural situation breaks such equilibrium. The naturally occurring codon composition is responsible for optimizing the mRNA expression, and under such composition, the mRNA structure having highest stability is selected by nature.