ImportanceOpioids are routinely prescribed for postoperative home pain management for most patients in the United States, with limited evidence of the amount needed to be dispensed. Opioid-based treatment often adversely affects recovery. Prescribed opioids increase the risk of chronic opioid use, abuse, and diversion and contribute to the current opioid epidemic.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether after hospital discharge, postsurgical acute pain can be effectively managed with a markedly reduced number of opioid doses.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this case-control cohort study, an ultrarestrictive opioid prescription protocol (UROPP) was designed and implemented from June 26, 2017, through June 30, 2018, at a single tertiary-care comprehensive cancer center. All patients undergoing gynecologic oncology surgery were included. Patients undergoing ambulatory or minimally invasive surgery (laparoscopic or robotic approach) were not prescribed opioids at discharge unless they required more than 5 doses of oral or intravenous opioids while in the hospital. Patients who underwent a laparotomy were provided a 3-day opioid pain medication supply at discharge.Main Outcomes and MeasuresTotal number of opioid pain medications prescribed in the 60-day perioperative period, requests for opioid prescription refills, and postoperative pain scores and complications were evaluated. Factors associated with increased postoperative pain, preoperative and postoperative pain scores, inpatient status, prior opioid use, and all opioid prescriptions within the 60-day perioperative window were monitored among the case patients and compared with those from consecutive control patients treated at the center in the 12 months before the UROPP was implemented.ResultsPatient demographics and procedure characteristics were not statistically different between the 2 cohorts of women (605 cases: mean [SD] age, 56.3 [14.5] years; 626 controls: mean [SD] age, 55.5 [13.9] years). The mean (SD) number of opioid tablets given at discharge after a laparotomy was 43.6 (17.0) before implementation of the UROPP and 12.1 (8.9) after implementation (P < .001). For patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic surgery, the mean (SD) number of opioid tablets given at discharge was 38.4 (17.4) before implementation of the UROPP and 1.3 (3.7) after implementation (P < .001). After ambulatory surgery, the mean (SD) number of opioid tablets given at discharge was 13.9 (16.6) before implementation of the UROPP and 0.2 (2.1) after implementation (P < .001). The mean (SD) perioperative oral morphine equivalent dose was reduced to 64.3 (207.2) mg from 339.4 (674.4) mg the year prior for all opioid-naive patients (P < .001). The significant reduction in the number of dispensed opioids was not associated with an increase the number of refill requests (104 patients [16.6%] in the pre-UROPP group vs 100 patients [16.5%] in the post-UROPP group; P = .99), the mean (SD) postoperative visit pain scores (1.1 [2.2] for the post-UROPP group vs 1.4 [2.3] for pre-UROPP group; P =...

ImportanceChanges in postsurgical opioid prescribing practices may help reduce chronic opioid use in surgical patients.ObjectiveTo investigate whether postsurgical acute pain across different surgical subspecialties can be managed effectively after hospital discharge with an opioid supply of 3 or fewer days and whether this reduction in prescribed opioids is associated with reduced new, persistent opioid use.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this prospective cohort study with a case-control design, a restrictive opioid prescription protocol (ROPP) specifying an opioid supply of 3 or fewer days after discharge from surgery along with standardized patient education was implemented across all surgical services at a tertiary-care comprehensive cancer center. Participants were all patients who underwent surgery from August 1, 2018, to July 31, 2019.Main Outcomes and MeasuresMain outcomes were the rate of compliance with the ROPP in each surgical service, the mean number of prescription days and refill requests, type of opioid prescribed, and rate of conversion to chronic opioid use determined via a state-run opioid prescription program. Postsurgical complications were also measured.ResultsA total of 4068 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.0 [13.8] years; 2528 women [62.1%]) were included, with 2017 in the pre-ROPP group (August 1, 2018, to January 31, 2019) and 2051 in the post-ROPP group (February 1, 2019, to July 31, 2019). The rate of compliance with the protocol was 95%. After implementation of the ROPP, mean opioid prescription days decreased from a mean (SD) of 3.9 (4.5) days in the pre-ROPP group to 1.9 (3.6) days in the post-ROPP group (P &amp;lt; .001). The ROPP implementation led to a 45% decrease in prescribed opioids after surgery (mean [SD], 157.22 [338.06] mean morphine milligram equivalents [MME] before ROPP vs 83.54 [395.70] MME after ROPP; P &amp;lt; .001). Patients in the post-ROPP cohort requested fewer refills (367 of 2051 [17.9%] vs 422 of 2017 [20.9%] in the pre-ROPP cohort; P = .02). There was no statistically significant difference in surgical complications. The conversion rate to chronic opioid use decreased following ROPP implementation among both opioid-naive patients with cancer (11.3% [143 of 1267] to 4.5% [118 of 2645]; P &amp;lt; .001) and those without cancer (6.1% [19 of 310] to 2.7% [16 of 600]; P = .02).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, prescribing an opioid supply of 3 or fewer days to surgical patients after hospital discharge was feasible for most patients, led to a significant decrease in the number of opioids prescribed after surgery, and was associated with a significantly decreased conversion to long-term opioid use without concomitant increases in refill requests or significant compromises in surgical recovery.

No abstract

103 Background: Opioids are routinely given for postoperative pain management with limited evidence on the amount needed to be dispensed. Prescribed opioids increase the risk of chronic use, abuse, and diversion, which contribute to the opioid epidemic. We sought to demonstrate that postsurgical acute pain can be effectively managed across different surgical specialties with a markedly reduced number of opioids. Methods: A prospective case-control study of restrictive opioid prescription protocol (ROPP) was implemented in all surgical services from February 2019 through July 2019 at a tertiary comprehensive cancer center for all patients undergoing a surgery for which opioids would be routinely prescribed at discharge (n = 2,015). Data from surgeries performed by the same services from August 2018 through January 2019 were used for comparison (n = 2,051). At discharge, patients did not routinely receive opioids unless they had a maximally invasive procedure or if they required multiple doses of opioids during hospitalization (maximum 3-day supply). Compliance with the protocol was tracked by pharmacists daily. Patient demographics and surgical details were collected. State-run opioid prescription database was used to determine the number of opioids prescribed to all surgical patients within a 120-day surgical window. Validated patient satisfaction surveys were used at postoperative visits to assess patient experience. Results: After implementation of the ROPP, 45% less opioids were prescribed after surgery for all participating patients (323,674 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) vs 179,458 MME, p < 0.001). The majority of services complied with the ROPP in more than 95% of cases. There was no difference in postsurgical pain intensity between cohorts. Patients in the ROPP cohort had less refill requests compared to the control group (20.9% vs 17.9%, p value = 0.016). Surveys were completed by 338 patients in the control group (16.5%) and 360 in the ROPP group (17.9%). There was no significant difference in patient reported satisfaction with postoperative pain control or on the impact of pain on daily activities between the cohorts. Conclusions: Implementation of a ROPP by multiple surgical services at a tertiary cancer center was feasible and resulted in substantial decrease in the number of opioids prescribed while not compromising patient experience. Patients did not require more prescription refills despite being provided no opioids or a limited supply. This study provides evidence to support reducing the number of opioids routinely prescribed after surgery.[Table: see text]

e14564 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are monoclonal antibodies that promote immune recognition of tumor cells to facilitate their elimination. Opioids are a major facet of pain management in cancer patients. Since chronic opioid use results in immunosuppression, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival outcomes of cancer patients on concurrent ICI and opioid therapy. Methods: This single-institute retrospective study from an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center evaluated all patients in the primary or recurrent setting who underwent ICI therapy (anti-PD-1/PD-L1/CTLA-4) from 1 January 2020 to 18 June 2021. Demographic, clinicopathologic, and co-morbidity data were obtained from electronic medical records and the New York State Cancer Registry data. The New York State Prescription Monitoring Program was used to collect data about opioid prescriptions filled by patients from 30 days prior to and 30 days after the end of ICI therapy. Patient characteristics were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U or chi-square tests. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox model regression, adjusting for relevant clinical factors. Results: A total of 869 patients were evaluable based on inclusion criteria and data availability. Most patients (77.15% chronic users and 64.62% occasional users) had stage III/IV disease. The most represented services included: gynecology (11.54%), soft tissue/melanoma (14.13%), thoracic (38.75%), urology (11.9%). Comorbidities did not vary between the two groups. Pre-treatment median opioid consumption was higher in the chronic users compared to occasional users (240 oral morphine equivalents (OME) vs 120, p = 0.03). Total opioid prescriptions filled was significantly higher for chronic users compared to occasional users (4275.0 vs 520.1 OME, p < 0.001). Chronic users were more likely to be on an additional anti-neoplastic agent (64% vs 44.07% for occasional users). Occasional users had significantly longer progression free (44.7 vs 16.0 months, p < 0.001) and overall (42.7 vs 16.2 months, p < 0.001) survival. When controlling for age, stage, and concurrent therapy, chronic opioid use retained a significantly negative association with PFS and OS. Conclusions: Patients on ICI therapy in the primary and recurrent setting who chronically use opioids exhibit significantly decreased PFS and OS compared to the occasional user cohort. This study provides evidence that chronic opioid use during ICI therapy results in inferior clinical outcomes.