No abstract

In December 1996, the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland produced a series of recommendations outlining the safe conduct of interhospital transfers for patients with acute head injuries. We assessed the current ability of UK hospitals to implement these recommendations and opinions on the formation of transfer teams, using a postal questionnaire. This was sent to all Royal College of Anaesthetists tutors, 268 of whom replied (94% response rate). Of the hospitals surveyed, 208 received adult head-injury patients but did not have on-site neurosurgical facilities. In 171 (86.8%) of these hospitals, senior house officers could be expected to accompany the patient during subsequent transfer. The majority of hospitals (192, 92.3%) were able to monitor ECG, pulse oximetry and blood pressure during the journey, but only 97 (46.6%) had facilities to monitor end tidal carbon dioxide levels. As a result of the anaesthetist's involvement in the transfer, emergency operating could be delayed in 169 (81.3%) hospitals. One hundred and fifty-eight (76%) respondents thought that the formation of transfer teams to transport critically ill patients would have some merit. Hospitals are responding to the published guidelines, but improvements are still needed in levels of equipment and insurance provision, along with the identification of a designated consultant at each hospital with responsibility for transfers.

Adverse events and complications, even if minor, can result in considerable negative effects on patients, including loss of life. They can also have an impact on the healthcare workers involved. Offering an apology to a patient who has suffered a complication is necessary, and is not an admission of fault. In England and Wales, there are also statutory obligations of candour in cases of more severe notifiable events. Local and national systems exist for incident reporting, with a strong emphasis on learning from events and sharing of best practice. Complaints may arise from poor management of a patient's complications, and in situations where there is a clear breach of a professional duty that has resulted in patient harm, negligence may be deemed to have occurred. National Health Service Resolution focuses on learning from events to help reduce the growth in litigation and emphasises that discussions should be timely, include appropriate explanation and information, and provide ongoing support and, if necessary, continuity of care.

Maintenance of a patent airway to allow ventilation with high concentration oxygen is an essential procedure during the resuscitation of all trauma patients. A range of equipment is available to help achieve and maintain a clear airway, with endotracheal intubation remaining the gold standard. However, in trauma patients attempts at intubation are often impeded by the presence of associated injuries and the application of devices to immobilize the cervical spine. In the situation of ‘can’t ventilate, can’t intubate’ a surgical airway can be life-saving while expert help is sought. Recently, new devices, in particular the laryngeal mask airway and Combitube®, have gained recognition as having a role in difficult airway management when other methods have failed, thereby reducing the need for surgical intervention. This paper presents an overview of the currently accepted methodology of managing the difficult airway in the trauma patient.