Pediatric high-grade gliomas (pHGGs), encompassing hemispheric and diffuse midline gliomas (DMGs), remain a devastating disease. The last decade has revealed oncogenic drivers including single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in histones. However, the contribution of structural variants (SVs) to gliomagenesis has not been systematically explored due to limitations in early SV analysis approaches. Using SV algorithms, we recently created, we analyzed SVs in whole-genome sequences of 179 pHGGs including a novel cohort of treatment naïve samples-the largest WGS cohort assembled in adult or pediatric glioma. The most recurrent SVs targeted MYC isoforms and receptor tyrosine kinases, including a novel SV amplifying a MYC enhancer in the lncRNA CCDC26 in 12% of DMGs and revealing a more central role for MYC in these cancers than previously known. Applying de novo SV signature discovery, we identified five signatures including three (SVsig1-3) involving primarily simple SVs, and two (SVsig4-5) involving complex, clustered SVs. These SV signatures associated with genetic variants that differed from what was observed for SV signatures in other cancers, suggesting different links to underlying biology. Tumors with simple SV signatures were TP53 wild-type but were enriched with alterations in TP53 pathway members PPM1D and MDM4. Complex signatures were associated with direct aberrations in TP53, CDKN2A, and RB1 early in tumor evolution, and with extrachromosomal amplicons that likely occurred later. All pHGGs exhibited at least one simple SV signature but complex SV signatures were primarily restricted to subsets of H3.3 K27M DMGs and hemispheric pHGGs. Importantly, DMGs with the complex SV signatures SVsig4-5 were associated with shorter overall survival independent of histone type and TP53 status. These data inform the role and impact of SVs in gliomagenesis and mechanisms that shape them.

The role of PPM1D mutations in de novo gliomagenesis has not been systematically explored. Here we analyze whole genome sequences of 170 pediatric high-grade gliomas and find that truncating mutations in PPM1D that increase the stability of its phosphatase are clonal driver events in 11% of Diffuse Midline Gliomas (DMGs) and are enriched in primary pontine tumors. Through the development of DMG mouse models, we show that PPM1D mutations potentiate gliomagenesis and that PPM1D phosphatase activity is required for in vivo oncogenesis. Finally, we apply integrative phosphoproteomic and functional genomics assays and find that oncogenic effects of PPM1D truncation converge on regulators of cell cycle, DNA damage response, and p53 pathways, revealing therapeutic vulnerabilities including MDM2 inhibition.

Forkhead box R2 (FOXR2) is a forkhead transcription factor located on the X chromosome whose expression is normally restricted to the testis. In this study, we performed a pan-cancer analysis of FOXR2 activation across more than 10,000 adult and pediatric cancer samples and found FOXR2 to be aberrantly upregulated in 70% of all cancer types and 8% of all individual tumors. The majority of tumors (78%) aberrantly expressed FOXR2 through a previously undescribed epigenetic mechanism that involves hypomethylation of a novel promoter, which was functionally validated as necessary for FOXR2 expression and proliferation in FOXR2-expressing cancer cells. FOXR2 promoted tumor growth across multiple cancer lineages and co-opted ETS family transcription circuits across cancers. Taken together, this study identifies FOXR2 as a potent and ubiquitous oncogene that is epigenetically activated across the majority of human cancers. The identification of hijacking of ETS transcription circuits by FOXR2 extends the mechanisms known to active ETS transcription factors and highlights how transcription factor families cooperate to enhance tumorigenesis. Significance: This work identifies a novel promoter that drives aberrant FOXR2 expression and delineates FOXR2 as a pan-cancer oncogene that specifically activates ETS transcriptional circuits across human cancers. See related commentary by Liu and Northcott, p. 2977